PiccirilloJFOutcomes research and otolaryngology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1994;111:764–9.
2.
RoperWLWinkenwerderWHackbarthGMKrakauerH.Effectiveness in health care. An initiative to evaluate and improve medical practice. N Engl J Med1988;319: 1197–202.
3.
EpsteinAMThe outcomes movement—will it get us where we want to go?N Engl J Med1990;323:266–9.
4.
RelmanASAssessment and accountability. The third revolution in medical care. N Engl J Med1988;319: 1220–2.
5.
BergnerM.Quality of life, health status, and clinical research. Med Care1988;27:S148–56.
6.
CellaDFBonomiAEMeasuring quality of life: 1995 update. Oncology1995;9:47–60.
7.
CharlsonMEPompeiPAlesHL. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis1987;40:373–83.
8.
ChassinMRKosecoffJParkRE. Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health care services?JAMA1987;258:2533–7.
9.
D'AgostinoRBKwanH.Measuring effectiveness: What to expect without a randomized control group. Med Care1995;33:AS95–105.
10.
DonabedianA.The quality of care: How can it be assessed?JAMA1988;260:1743–8.
11.
EddyDMClinical decision making: From theory to practice. Cost-effectiveness analysis. A conversation with my father. JAMA1992a;267: 1669–75.
12.
EisenbergJMEconomics. JAMA1995;273:1670–1.
13.
EllwoodPMShattuck lecture—outcomes management. A technology of patient experience. N Engl J Med1988;318: 1549–56.
14.
EpsteinAMThe outcomes movement—Will it get us where we want to go?N Engl J Med1990;323:266–9.
15.
FeinsteinARClinical biostatistics. XLI. Hard science, soft data, and the challenges of choosing clinical variables in research. Clin Pharmacol Ther1977;22: 485–98.
16.
GillTMFeinsteinARA critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. JAMA1994;272:619–26.
17.
GreenfieldS.The state of outcomes research: Are we on target? [editorial]. N Engl J Med1989;320:1142–3.
18.
GuyattGHBombardierCTugwellPXMeasuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials. Canadian Medical Association Journal1986;134:889–95.
19.
IezzoniLISeverity of illness measures. Comments and caveats. Med Care1990;28: 757–61.
20.
KassirerJPThe quality of care and the quality of measuring it. N Engl J Med1993;329:1263–5.
21.
KatzJNLarsonMGPhillipsCBFosselAHLiangMHComparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care1992;30:917–25.
22.
LeapeLLParkRESolomonDHChassinMRKosecoffJBrookRHDoes inappropriate use explain small-area variations in the use of health care services?JAMA1990;263:669–72.
23.
LohrKNOutcome measurement: Concepts and questions. Inquiry1988;25:37–50.
24.
PatrickDLDeyoRAGeneric and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care1989;27:S217–32.
25.
PhelpsCEThe methodologic foundations of studies of the appropriateness of medical care. N Engl J Med1993;329:1241–5.
26.
PiccirilloJFOutcomes research and otolaryngology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1994;111:764–9.
27.
PiccirilloJFFeinsteinARBlack-box mathematics and medical practice. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1993;119:147–55.
28.
PliskinNTaylorAKGeneral principles: Cost benefit and decision analysis. In: BunkerJBarnesBMostellerF, editors. Costs, risks and benefits of surgery. New York: Oxford University Press;1977. p. 5–27.
29.
RelmanASAssessment and accountability. The third revolution in medical care. N Engl J Med1988;319: 1220–2.
30.
RoperWLWinkenwerderWHackbarthGMKrakauerH.Effectiveness in health care. An initiative to evaluate and improve medical practice. N Engl J Med1988;319: 1197–202.
31.
RubinHRGandekBRogersWHKosinsjiMMcHorneyCAWareJEJr.Patients' ratings of outpatient visits in different practice settings. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA1993;270: 835–40.
32.
SackettDLRosenbergWMCGrayJAMHaynesRBRichardsonWSEvidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ1996;312:71–2.
33.
TarlovARWareJEJr,GreenfieldSNelsonECPerrinEZubkoffM.The Medical Outcomes Study: An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA1989;262:925–30.
34.
WennbergJGittelsohnA.Variations in medical care among small areas. Sci Am1982;246:120–34.
35.
WennbergJEOutcomes research, cost containment, and the fear of health care rationing. N Engl J Med1990;323:1202–4.
36.
Assessing medical technologies. Washington (DC): National Academy Press;1985.
37.
Committee on Methods for Setting Priorities for Guidelines Development, Institute of Medicine. In: FieldMJ, editor. Setting priorities for clinical practice guidelines. Washington (DC): National Academy Press;1995.
38.
AaronsonNKQuality of life assessment in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials1989;10:195S–208S.
39.
AaronsonNKQuality of life research in clinical trials. A need for common rules and language. Oncology1990;4: 59–66.
40.
AndersonJPKaplanRMBerryCCBushJWRumbautRGInterday reliability of function assessment for a health status measure: The Quality of Well-Being Scale. Med Care1989;27:1076–84.
41.
ApgarV.A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Anesth Analg1953;32:260–7.
42.
BaldwinLMInuiTSStenkampS.The effect of coordinated, multidisciplinary ambulatory care on service use, charges, quality of care and patient satisfaction in the elderly. J Community Health1993;18:95–108.
43.
BergnerM.Measurement of health status. Med Care1985;23:696–704.
44.
BergnerMBobbittRACarterWBGilsonBSThe Sickness Impact Profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care1981;19:787–805.
45.
BerwickDMContinuous improvement as an ideal in health care. N Engl J Med1989;320:53–6.
46.
BerwickDMGodfreyABRoessnerJ.Curing health care. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass;1990.
47.
BjelleA.Functional status assessment. Curr Opin Rheumatol1991;3:280–5.
48.
BorchardtWWPatient perception of quality in the clinic setting and relevant strategies for improvement. College Review1994;6:72–97.
49.
BrazierJEHarperRJonesNMB. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: New outcome measure for primary care. BMJ1992;305:160–4.
50.
BrookRHLohrKNMonitoring quality of care in the Medicare program. Two proposed systems. JAMA1987;258: 3138–41.
51.
BrookRHMcGlynnEAMaintaining quality of care. In: GinzbergE, editor. Health services research. Key to health policy. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press;1991. p. 284–314.
52.
BrookRHWareJEDavies-AveryA. Overview of adult health status measures fielded in Rand's Health Insurance Study. Med Care1979;17:1–131.
53.
BrookRHWareJERogersWH. Does free care improve adults' health? Results from a randomized trial. N Engl J Med1983;309:1426–34.
54.
BusschbachJJVHorikxPEvan den BoschJMMDe la RiviereABde CharroFTMeasuring the quality of life before and after bilateral lung transplantation in patients with cystic fibrosis. Chest1994;105:911–7.
55.
CaineNHarrisonSCSharpiesLDWallworkJ.Prospective study of quality of life before and after coronary bypass grafting. BMJ1991;302:511–6.
56.
CareyRGLloydRCMeasuring quality improvement in health care. A guide to statistical process control applications. New York: Quality Resources;1995.
57.
CellaDFCherinEAQuality of life during and after cancer treatment. Compr Ther1988;14:69–75.
58.
CellaDFTulskyDSMeasuring quality of life today: Method-ologic aspects. Oncology1990;4:29–38.
59.
CellaDFTulskyDSGrayG. The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol1993;11:570–9.
60.
ChassinMRKosecoffJParkRE. Indications for selected medical and surgical procedures: a literature review and ratings of appropriateness: coronary angiography, publication R3204/1-CWF-HF-HCFA-PMT-RWJ. Santa Monica (CA): The Rand Corp;1986.
61.
ChassinMRKosecoffJSolomonDHBrookRHHow coronary angiography is used. Clinical determinants of appropriateness. JAMA1987;258: 2543–7.
62.
ClearyPDMcNeilBJPatient satisfaction as an indicator of quality of care. Inquiry1988;25:25–36.
63.
DaviesARWareJEInvolving consumers in quality of care assessment. Health Aff (Millwood)1988;7:33–48.
64.
DaughertyCRatainMJGrochowskiE. Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials. J Clin Oncol1995;13:1062–72.
65.
de HaesJCJMvan KnippenbergFCEQuality of life of cancer patients: Review of the literature. In: AaronsonNKBeckmannJ, editors. The quality of life of cancer patients. New York: Raven Press;1987. p. 167–82.
66.
DeyoRACarterWBStrategies for improving and expanding the application of health status measures in clinical settings. A researcher-developer viewpoint [discussion], Med Care1992;30:176–86.
67.
DeyoRAPatrickDLThe significance of treatment effects: The clinical perspective. Med Care1995;33:AS286–91.
68.
DonovanJLFrankelSJEylesJDAssessing the need for health status measures. J Epidemiol Community Health1993:47:158–62.
69.
EisenbergJMClinical economics. A guide to the economic analysis of clinical practice. JAMA1989;262: 2879–86.
70.
ElinsonJ.In discussion: DonabedianASpitzerWTarlovA.Advances in health assessment conference discussion panel J Chronic Dis1987;40(Suppl 1):183S–91S.
71.
ElmoreJGFeinsteinARA bibliography of publications on observer variability (final installment). J Clin Epidemiol1992;45:567–80.
72.
EpsteinAMHallJATognettiJ. Using proxies to evaluate quality of life. Med Care1989;27:S91–8.
73.
FeinsteinARThe pre-therapeutic classification of co-morbidity in chronic disease. J Chron Dis1970;23:455–69.
74.
FeinsteinARClinical biostatistics. XVI. The process of prognostic stratification. Part 2. Clin Pharmacol Ther1972;13: 609–24.
75.
FeinsteinARClinical biostatistics. XIV. The purposes of prognostic stratification. Clin Pharmacol Ther1972;13: 285–97.
76.
FeinsteinARThe ‘chagrin factor’ and qualitative decision analysis. Arch Intern Med1985;145:1257–9.
77.
FeinsteinARPara-analysis, faute de mieux, and the perils of riding on a data barge. J Clin Epidemiol1989;42:929–35.
78.
FeinsteinARHorwitzRIDouble standards, scientific methods, and epidemiologic research. N Engl J Med1982;307:1611–7.
79.
FerransCEPowersMJQuality of life index: Development and psychometric properties. Adv Nurs1985;8:15–24.
80.
FowlerFJClearyPDMagazinerJPatrickDLBenjaminKLMethodological issues in measuring patient-reported outcomes: The agenda of the work group on outcomes assessment. Med Care1994;32(Suppl):JS65–76.
81.
FriesJFSpitzPWThe hierarchy of patient outcome. In: SpilkerB, editor. Quality of life assessments in clinical trials. New York: Raven Press;1990. p. 25–35.
82.
GarnickDWHendricksAMComstockCBMeasuring quality of care: Fundamental information from administrative datasets. Int J Qual Health Care1994;6:163–77.
83.
GeigleRJonesSBOutcomes measurement: A report from the front. Inquiry1990;27:7–13.
84.
GlaserEMUsing behavioral science strategies for defining the state-of-the-art. J Appl Behav Sci1980;16:79–92.
85.
GoldbergHIMartinDPChristensenDBNeighborWEInuiTSLoGerfoJPThe Health of the Public Program at the University of Washington: A new role for academic medical centers. Acad Med1991;66:499–505.
86.
GoldmannDAContemporary challenges for hospital epidemiology. Am J Med1991;91:8S–15S.
87.
GonnellaJSHornbrookMCLouisDZStaging of disease. A case-mix measurement. JAMA1984;251: 637–44.
88.
GotayCCKornELMcCabeMSMooreTDChesonBDQuality-of-life assessment in cancer treatment protocols: Research issues in protocol development. J Natl Cancer Inst1992;84:575–9.
89.
GouveiaWABungayKMMassaroFJWareJEJr.Paradigm for the management of patient outcomes [see comments]. Am J Hosp Pharm1991;48:1912–6.
90.
GrecoPJEisenbergJMChanging physicians' practices. N Engl J Med1993;329:1271–4.
91.
GreeneMGAdelmanRDFriedmannECharonR.Older patient satisfaction with communication during an initial medical encounter. Soc Sci Med1994;38:1279–88.
92.
GreenfieldSAronowHUElashoffRMWatanbeD.Flaws in mortality data. The hazards of ignoring comorbid disease. JAMA1988;260: 2253–5.
93.
GreenfieldSKaplanSWareJEJr.Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med1985;102: 520–8.
94.
GreenfieldSNelsonECRecent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings. Med Care1992;30:MS23–41.
95.
GrinerPFMayewskiRJMushlinAIGreenlandP.Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Ann Intern Med1981;94:553–600.
96.
GuyattGFeenyDPatrickD.Issues in quality of life measurement in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials1991;12:81S–90S.
97.
GuyattGHCookDJHealth status, quality of life, and the individual [commentary]. JAMA1994;272:630–1.
98.
HarrellFELeeKLCaliffRMPryorDBRosatiRARegression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction. Stat Med1984;3:143–52.
99.
HaysRDAndersonRRevickiD.Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures. Qual Life Res1993;2:441–9.
100.
HaysRDKravitzRLMazelRB. The impact of patient adherence on health outcomes for chronic disease patients in the Medical Outcomes Study. J Behav Med1994;17:347–60.
101.
HaysRDStewartALConstruct validity of MOS health measures. In: StewartALWareJE, editors. Measuring functioning and well-being: The Medical Outcomes Study approach. Durham (NC): Duke University Press;1992, p. 325–42.
102.
HaysRDStewartALSleep measures. In: StewartALWareJE, editors. Measuring functioning and well-being: the Medical Outcomes Study approach. Durham (NC): Duke University Press;1992. p. 235–59.
103.
Health Services Research Group.A guide to direct measures of patient satisfaction in clinical practice. Can Med Assoc J1992;146:1727–31.
104.
HorwitzRIFeinsteinARThe application of therapeutic-trial principles to improve the design of epidemiologic research: A case-control study suggesting that anticoagulants reduce mortality in patients with myocardial infarction. J Chronic Dis1981;34:575–83.
105.
IezzoniLIUsing risk-adjusted outcomes to assess clinical practice: An overview of issues pertaining to risk adjustment. Ann Thorac Surg1994;58:1822–6.
106.
IezzoniLIDaleyJHeerenT. Using administrative data to screen hospitals for high complication rates. Inquiry1994;31:40–55.
107.
IezzoniLIFoleySMHeerenT. A method for screening the quality of hospital care using administrative data: Preliminary validation results. Qual Rev Bull1992;18:361–71.
108.
IezzoniLIGreenbergLGWidespread assessment of risk-adjusted outcomes: Lessons from local initiatives. Jt Comm J Qual Improv1994;20:305–16.
109.
IezzoniLIRestucciaJDShwartzM. The utility of severity of illness information in assessing the quality of hospital care. The role of the clinical trajectory. Med Care1992;30: 428–44.
110.
JaeschkeRGuyattGHHow to develop and validate a new quality of life instrument. In: SpilkerB, editor. Quality of life assessments in clinical trials. New York: Raven Press;1990. p. 47–57.
111.
JenkinsCDAssessment of outcomes of health intervention. Soc Sci Med1992;35:367–75.
112.
JenkinsCDJonoRTStantonBAStroup-BenhamCAThe measurement of health-related quality of life: Major dimensions identified by factor analysis. Soc Sci Med1990;31:925–31.
113.
JuniperEFGuyattGHKingDRComparison of methods for selecting items for a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire: Importance versus factor analysis. Qual Life Res1994;3:52–3.
114.
KahnKLRogersWHRubensteinLVMeasuring quality of care with explicit process criteria before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system. JAMA1990;264:1969–73.
115.
KahnKLRothCPKosecoffJ. Indications for selected medical and surgical procedures: a literature review and ratings of appropriateness: diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, publication R-3204/4-CWJ-HF-HCFA-PMT-RWJ. Santa Monica (CA): Rand Corp;1986.
116.
KaplanMHFeinsteinARThe importance of classifying initial co-morbidity in evaluating the outcome of diabetes mellitus. J Chronic Dis1974;27:387–404.
117.
KaplanRMAndersonJPWuAW. The Quality of Well-Being Scale: Applications in AIDS, cystic fibrosis, and arthritis. Med Care1989;27:S27–43.
118.
KatzS, editor. The Portugal Conference: Measuring quality of life and functional status in clinical and epidemiological research. J Chronic Dis1987;40:459–650.
119.
KnausWADraperEAWagnerDPZimmermanJEAPACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med1985;13:818–29.
120.
KosecoffJKanouseDERogersWH. Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practice. JAMA1987;258:2708–13.
121.
KrahnMGafniA.Discounting in the economic evaluation of health care interventions. Med Care1993;31:403–18.
122.
KrauseNMJayGMWhat do global self-rated health items measure?Med Care1994;32:930–42.
123.
L'AbbeKADetskyASO'RourkeK.Meta-analysis in clinical research. Ann Intern Med1987;107:224–33.
124.
LaffelGBlumenthalD.The case for using industrial quality management science in health care organizations. JAMA1989;262:2869–73.
125.
LangnerSRHutelmyerC.Patient satisfaction with outpatient human immunodeficiency virus care as delivered by nurse practitioners and physicians. Holistic Nursing Practice1995;10:54–60.
126.
LeebovWVergareMScottG.Patient satisfaction: a guide to practice enhancement. Oradell (NJ): Medical Economics;1990.
127.
LewisCCPantellRHKieckhefferGMAssessment of children's health status: Field test of new approaches. Med Care1989;27:s54–65.
128.
LewisJRPatient views on quality care in general practice: Literature review. Soc Sci Med1994;39:655–70.
129.
LightRJPillemerDBSumming up The science of reviewing research. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press;1984.
130.
MaklanCWGreeneRCummingsMAMethodological challenges and innovations in patient outcomes research. Med Care1994;32(Suppl):JS13–21.
131.
McCormickB.Can research change the way MDs practice medicine?Hospitals1990;64:32–6.
132.
MerrickNJFinkABrookRH. Indications for selected medical and surgical procedures: a literature review and ratings of appropriateness: carotid endarterectomy, publication R-3204/6-CWJ-HF-HCFA-PMT-RWJ. Santa Monica (CA): Rand Corp;1986.
133.
MillsJLSounding board: Data torturing. N Engl J Med1993;329:1196–9.
134.
MitchellJBBubolzTPaulJE. Using Medicare claims for outcomes research. Med Care1994;32(Suppl):JS38–51.
135.
MoinpourCMFeiglPMetchBHaydenKAMeyskensFLCrowleyJ.Quality of life endpoints in cancer clinical trials: Review and recommendations. J Natl Cancer Inst1989;81:485–95.
136.
MoloneyTWPaulB.The consumer movement takes hold in medical care. Health Aff (Millwood)1991;10:268–79.
137.
MosesLEMeasuring effects without randomized trials? Options, problems, challenges. Med Care1995;33:AS8–14.
138.
MullanFJacobyI.The town meeting for technology: The maturation of consensus conferences. JAMA1985;254:1068–72.
139.
New York State Department of Health.Coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State, 1990–1992. Albany (NY): New York State Department of Health;1993.
O'BrienBJBuxtonMJFergusonBAMeasuring the effectiveness of heart transplant programs: Quality of life data and their relationship to survival analysis. J Chronic Dis1987;40:137s–53s.
142.
O'BrienBJBuxtonMJPattersonDLRelationship between functional status and health-related quality-of-life after myocardial infarction. Med Care1993;31:950–5.
143.
O'YoungJMcPeekB.Quality of life variables in surgical trials. J Chronic Dis1987;40:513–22.
144.
OyeRKLandefeldCSJayesRLOutcomes in SUPPORT. J Clin Epidemiol1990;43(Suppl):83S–7S.
145.
PalmerRHStrainRMaurerJRothrockJThompsonM.Quality assurance in eight adult Medicare practices. Med Care1984;22:632–43.
146.
ParkREBrookRHKosecoffJ. Explaining variations in hospital death rates: Randomness, severity of illness, quality of care. JAMA1992;264:484–90.
147.
ParkersonGRBroadheadWETseC-KJ.Comparison of the Duke Health Profile and the MOS Short-Form in healthy young adults. Med Care1991;29:679–83.
148.
ParkersonGRBroadheadWETseC-KJ.The Duke Health Profile. A 17-item measure of health and dysfunction. Med Care1990;28: 1056–72.
149.
ParkersonGRConnisRTBroadheadWEPatrickDLTaylorTRTseC-KJ.Disease-specific versus generic measurement of health-related quality of life in insulin-dependent diabetic patients. Med Care1993;31:629–39.
150.
ParkersonGRGehlbachSHWagnerEHJamesSAClappNEMuhlbaierLHThe Duke-UNC Health Profile: An adult health status instrument for primary care. Med Care1981;XIX:806–27.
151.
PattonMDAction research and the process of continual quality improvement in a cancer center. Oncol Nurs Forum1993;20:751–5.
152.
PaukerSGKassirerJPDecision analysis. N Engl J Med1987;316:250–7.
153.
PayerL.Medicine and culture. New York: Penguin Books;1988.
154.
PerryS.The NIH Consensus Development Program: A decade later. N Engl J Med1987;317:485–8.
155.
PoweNRTurnerJAMaklanCWErsekM.Alternative methods for a formal literature review and meta-analysis in AHCPR patient outcomes research teams. Med Care1994;32(Suppl):JS22–37.
156.
PowerEJIdentifying health technologies that work. From the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment. JAMA1995;274:205.
157.
RaskinIEMaklanCWMedical treatment effectiveness research: A view from inside the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Evaluation and the Health Professions1991;14:161–86.
158.
RichardsonJ.Cost utility analysis: What should be measured?Soc Sci Med1994;39:7–21.
159.
RobbinsJABertakisKDHelmsLJAzariRCallahanEJCretenDAThe influence of physician practice behaviors on patient satisfaction. Fam Med1993;25:17–20.
160.
RossCKStewardCASinacoreJMA comparative study of seven measures of patient satisfaction. Med Care1995;33:392–406.
161.
RutaDAGarrattAMLengMRussellITMacDonaldLMA new approach to the measurement of quality of life: The patient-generated index. Med Care1994;32:1109–26.
162.
SafranDGTarlovARRogersWHPrimary care performance in fee-for-service and prepaid health care system: Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA1994;271:1579–86.
163.
SchagCACHeinrichRLDevelopment of a comprehensive quality of life measurement tool: CARES. Oncology1990;4:135–8.
164.
SchipperH.Guidelines and caveats for quality of life measurement in clinical practice and research. Oncology1990;4:51–7.
165.
SchipperHClinchJMcMurrayALevittM.Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: The Functional Living Index—cancer: Development and validation. J Clin Oncol1984;2:472–83.
166.
ScottIUScheinODWestSBandeen-RocheKEngerCFolsteinMFFunctional status and quality of life measurement among ophthalmic patients. Arch Ophthalmol1994;112:329–35.
167.
SimmerTLNerenzDRRuttWMNewcombCSBenferDWA randomized, controlled trial of an attending staff service in general internal medicine. Med Care1991;29:JS31–40.
SpiererMSimsHWMicklitschCNLewisBEAssessment of patient satisfaction as part of a physician performance evaluation: The Fallon Clinic experience. J Ambulatory Care Manage1994;17:1–7.
170.
SpitzerWODobsonAJHallJ. Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients. A concise QL-index for use by physicians. J Chronic Dis1981;34: 585–97.
171.
SprangersMACCullABjordalK.The European organization for research and treatment of cancer approach to quality of life assessment: Guidelines for developing questionnaire modules. Qual Life Res1993;2:287–95.
172.
StalfeltAMQuality of life during induction treatment of acute myeloid leukemia: A comparison of three intensive chemotherapy regimens using three instruments for quality of life assessment. Acta Oncol1994;33:477–85.
173.
SteinbergEPBergnerMSommerA. Variations in cataract management: Patient and economic outcomes. Health Serv Res1990;25:727–31.
174.
StewartALHaysRDWareJEMethods of constructing health measures. In: StewartALWareJE, editors. Measuring functioning and well-being: The Medical Outcomes Study approach. Durham (NC): Duke University Press;1992. p. 67–85.
175.
StewartALHaysRDWareJEHealth perceptions, energy/fatigue, and health distress measures. In: StewartALWareJE, editors. Measuring functioning and well-being: The Medical Outcomes Study approach. Durham (NC): Duke University Press;1992. p. 143–72.
176.
StreetRLGoldWRMcDowellT.Using health status surveys in medical consultations. Med Care1994;32:732–44.
177.
TanenbaumSJWhat physicians know. N Engl J Med1993;329:1268–70.
178.
TeasdaleGJennettB.Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet1974;2:81–4.
179.
TsvatJWeeksJCGuadagnoliE. Using health-related quality of life information: Clinical encounters, clinical trials, and health policy. J Gen Intern Med1994;9:576–82.
180.
TunisSRHaywardRSWilsonMCInternists' attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med1994;120:956–63.
181.
WareJEStandards for validating health measures: Definition and content. J Chronic Dis1987;40:473–80.
182.
WareJEDaviesARRubinHRPatients' assessments of their care Office of Technology AssessmentThe quality of medical care: information for consumers. Washington (DC): US Congress;1988. p. 231–47.
183.
WareJEHaysRDMethods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters. Med Care1988;26:393–402.
184.
WareJESherbourneCDThe MOS 36 Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care1992;30: 473–83.
185.
WareJESnyderMKDimensions of patient attitudes regarding doctors and medical care services. Med Care1975;13:609–15.
186.
WareJESnyderMKWrightWRDaviesARDefining and measuring patients' satisfaction with medical care. Evaluation and Program Planning1983;6:247–63.
187.
WareJEJr.Conceptualizing and measuring generic health outcomes. Cancer1991;67:774–9.
WenSWHernandezRNaylorCDPitfalls in nonrandomized outcomes studies. The case of incidental appendectomy with open cholecystectomy. JAMA1995;274: 1687–91.
190.
WennbergJGittelsohnA.Small area variations in health care delivery. Science1973;182:1102–7.
191.
WennbergJEBarnesBAZubkoffM.Professional uncertainty and the problem of supplier-induced demand. Soc Sci Med1982;16:811–24.
192.
WennbergJEBunkerJPBarnesB.The need for assessing the outcomes of common medical practices. Annu Rev Public Health1980;1:277–95.
193.
WennbergJERoosNSolaLSchoriAJaffeR.Use of claims data systems to evaluate health care outcomes. Mortality and reoperation following prostatectomy. JAMA1987;257: 933–6.
194.
WensingMGrolRSmitsA.Quality judgements by patients on general practice care: A literature analysis. Soc Sci Med1994;38:45–53.
195.
WilsonSRPatient and physician behavior models related to asthma care. Med Care1993;31:MS49–60.
196.
WinklerJDKanouseDEBrodsleyL. Popular press coverage of eight National Institutes of Health consensus development topics. JAMA1986;255:1323–7.
197.
WrayNPAshtonCMKuykendallDH. Selecting disease—outcomes pairs for monitoring the quality of hospital care. Med Care1995;33:75–89.
198.
YerushalmyJ.Statistical problems in assessing methods of medical diagnosis, with special reference to x-ray techniques. Public Health Rep1947;62:1432–49.
199.
ZubrodCGSchneidermanMFreiE.Appraisal of methods for the study of chemotherapy of cancer in man: Comparative therapeutic trial of nitrogen mustards and triethylene thiophosphoramide. J Chronic Dis1960;11:7–30.
200.
Consensus Development Panel. NIH Consensus Development Conference Consensus Statement on Acoustic Neuroma. Bethesda (MD): N1H;1991 Dec 11–13.
201.
Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. NIH Consensus Statement, Mar 1–3. 1993;11(1):1–24.
202.
BakerCAFactors associated with rehabilitation in head and neck cancer. Cancer Nurs1992;15:395–400.
203.
BenningerMSKingFNicholsRDManagement guidelines for improvement of otolaryngology referrals from primary care physicians. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1995;113:446–52.
204.
BjordalKKaasaSMastekaasaA.Quality of life in patients treated for head and neck cancer: A follow-up study 7–11 years after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1994;28:847–56.
205.
BrowmanGPLevineMNHodsonDI. The Head and Neck Radiotherapy Questionnaire: A morbidity/quality-of-life instrument for clinical trials of radiation therapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol1993;11:863–72.
206.
BurnsLChaseDGoodwinWJTreatment of patients with stage IV cancer: Do the ends justify the means?Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1987;97:8–14.
207.
DanaSTSinusitis panel develops reimbursement criteria [out of committee]. AAO-HNS Bull1993;12(12):11.
208.
FielderHDenholmSWLyonsRA. Measurement of health status in patients with vertigo. Clin Otolaryngol1996;21:124–6.
209.
GliklichREHilinskiJMLongitudinal sensitivity of generic and specific health measures in chronic sinusitis. Qual Life Res1995;4:27–32.
210.
GliklichREMetsonR.A comparison of sinus computed tomography (CT) staging systems for outcomes research. Am J Rhinol1994;8:291–7.
211.
GliklichREMetsonR.Techniques for outcomes research in chronic sinusitis. Laryngoscope1995;105:387–90.
212.
GliklichREMetsonR.The health impact of chronic sinusitis in patients seeking otolaryngologic care. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1995;113:104–9.
213.
GotayCCMooreTDAssessing quality of life in head and neck cancer. Qual Life Res1992;1:5–17.
214.
GrimbyARosenthallU.Health-related quality of life and dizziness in old age. Gerontology1995;41:286–98.
215.
GrundfastKMManagement of otitis media and the new Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guideline. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1994;120:797–8.
216.
HannleyM.Academy enters outcomes research arena with new protocol: Treatment outcomes for obstructive sleep apnea [news & views from the office of research development]. AAO-HNS Bull1992;11(9):33.
217.
HarrisJPAndersonJPNovakR.An outcomes study of cochlear implants in deaf patients: Audiologic, economic, and quality-of-life changes. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1995;121:398–404.
218.
HassanSJWeymullerEAJr.Assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck1993;15:485–96.
219.
HoffmanSRDersarkissianRMBuckSHStinzianoGDBuckGMSinus disease and surgical treatment: A results oriented quality assurance study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1989;100:573–7.
220.
HoffmanSRMahoneyMCChmielJFStinzianoGDHoffmanKNSymptom relief after endoscopic sinus surgery: An outcomes-based study. Ear Nose Throat J1993;72:413–4, 419–20.
221.
IsenbergSFRosenfeldRMProblems and pitfalls in community-based outcomes research. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1997;116:662–5.
222.
JacobsonGPNewmanCWThe development of the dizziness handicap inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1990;116:424–7.
223.
JohnsMEThe medical appropriateness of tympanostomy tubes proposed for children younger than 16 years in the United States [editorial comment]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1994;120:801–2.
224.
JuniperEFGuyattGHDevelopment and testing of a new measure of health status for clinical trials in rhinoconjunctivitis. Clin Exp Allergy1991;21:77–83.
225.
KleinmanLCKosecoffJDuboisRWBrookRHThe medical appropriateness of tympanostomy tubes proposed for children younger than 16 years in the United States. JAMA1994;271:1250–5.
226.
KukFKTylerRSRussellD. The psychometric properties of a tinnitus handicap questionnaire. Ear Hear1990;11:434–45.
227.
ListMARitter-SterrCABakerTMLongitudinal assessment of quality of life in laryngeal cancer patients. Head Neck1996;18:1–10.
228.
ManghamCADecision analysis of auditory brainstem responses and rotational vestibular tests in acoustic tumor diagnosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1987;96:22–9.
229.
McNeilBJWeichselbaumRPaukerSGSpeech and survival.
230.
MeisterS.Emerging risk: Failure to detect heating disability in newborns. The problem: Lack of screening programs for normal newborns. QRC Advisor1993;10: 1–4.
231.
MulrowCDAguilarCEndicottJEQuality-of-life changes and hearing impairment: A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med1990;113:188–94.
232.
MulrowCDAguilarCEndicottJE. Association between hearing impairment and the quality of life of elderly individuals. J Am Geriatr Soc1990;38:45–50.
233.
O'RourkeICMcNeilRJWalkerPJBullCAObjective evaluation of the quality of palliation in patients with oesophageal cancer comparing surgery, radiotherapy and intubation. Aust N Z J Surg1992;62:922–30.
234.
PiccirilloJFDecision analysis in head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1991;117:933.
235.
PiccirilloJFThe inclusion of comorbidity in a staging system for head and neck cancer. Oncology1995;9:831–6.
236.
PiccirilloJFThe use of patient satisfaction data to assess the impact of continuous quality improvement efforts in an academic otolaryngology office. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1996;122:1045–8.
237.
PiccirilloJFEdwardsDHaidukAYonanCThawleySEPsychometric and clinimetric validity of the 31-item rhinosinusitis outcome measure (RSOM-31). Am J Rhinol1995;9:297–306.
238.
PlanteDAPiccirilloJFSoffermanRADecision analysis of treatment options in pyriform sinus carcinoma. Med Decis Making1987;7:74–83.
239.
RosenfeldRMPilot study of outcomes in pediatric rhinosinusitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1995;121:729–36.
240.
RosenfeldRMMandelEMBluestoneCDSystemic steroids for otitis media with effusion in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1991;117:984–9.
241.
RubinHRCan patients evaluate the quality of hospital care?Med Care Rev1990;47:267–326.
242.
RubinHRWuAWPatient satisfaction: Its importance and how to measure it. In: GitnickG, editor. The business of medicine: a physician's guide. New York: Elsevier Science Publishing;1991. p. 397–409.
243.
SherAESchechtmanKBPiccirilloJFThe efficacy of surgical treatments for obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep1996;19:156–77.
244.
SnydermanCHD'AmicoF.Outcome of carotid artery resection for neoplastic disease: A meta-analysis. Am J Otolaryngol1992;13:373–80.
245.
The Otitis Media Guideline Panel. Clinical practice guideline, otitis media with effusion in young children. 1994 July. Publication No.: 94-0622. Rockville (MD): Agency for Health Care Policy and Research;1994. p. iv.
246.
TurnerRGNielsenDWApplication of clinical decision analysis to audiological tests. Ear Hear1984;5:125–33.
247.
US Department of Health and Human Services.Managing otitis media with effusion in young children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1994;120:793–6.
248.
WeissMHHarrisonLBIsaacsRSUse of decision analysis in planning a management strategy for the stage NO neck [review]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1994;120:699–702.