Between Indians and “Cowboys”: The Role of ICT in the Management of Contradictory Self-images and the Production of Carbon Credits in the Brazilian Amazon
Available accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2016
Between Indians and “Cowboys”: The Role of ICT in the Management of Contradictory Self-images and the Production of Carbon Credits in the Brazilian Amazon
In this paper, we draw upon Goffman's symbolic interactionism to analyze the ways in which new users in developing countries have adopted ICT to present and manage contradictory self-images to different groups of the public. In particular, we show that the Acapú, an indigenous group in the Amazon, present themselves through online videos and websites as ideal Indians: innate forest stewards aiming to mitigate climate change and ensure the planet's environmental sustainability. At the same time, the Acapú are also represented through a complex computer simulation model as destructive “cowboys”: farmers and ranchers who are willing to develop by clearing their forests in the absence of financial compensation. This research shows that these two opposing self-images, while contradictory, are necessary for the implementation of REDD projects (a payment mechanism for reducing greenhouse emissions from deforestation). In order to obtain carbon credits from avoided deforestation, the project relies on the difference between deforestation measurements and high levels of predicted deforestation, which in turn, depend on the presentation of destructive self-images through the use of a complex computer simulation. But to sell these credits on a voluntary carbon market, it is necessary for the Acapú to openly market a self-image through the Internet which is attractive to corporate buyers willing to boost their eco-friendly profile. Based on this analysis, the paper challenges the narrative whereby Southern ICT users are passive receivers of technological black boxes. In contrast, it shows that in some cases these new users may participate in the creation of ICT artifacts to manage the impressions of distant audiences. Furthermore, the paper calls attention to the role of computer simulations and other ICT applications in concealing the paradoxes of neoliberal environmental management practices.
AkrichM. (1992). The Description of Technical Object, in BijkerW., and LawJ. (eds.) Shaping Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 205–224.
2.
AuerbachCF., and SilversteinL.B. (2003). Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis, New York: New York University Press.
3.
AvgerouC. (2010). Discourses on ICT and Development, Information Technologies and International Development6(3): 1–18.
4.
BansalP., and ClellandI. (2004). Talking Trash: Legitimacy, Impression Management, and Unsystematic Risk in the Context of the Natural Environment, Academy of Management Journal47(1): 93–103.
5.
BansalP., and RothK. (2000). Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness, The Academy of Management Journal43(4): 717–736.
6.
BarrettM., and WalshamG. (1999). Electronic Trading and Work Transformation in the London Insurance Market, Information Systems Research10(1): 1–22.
7.
BaymN.K., and BoydD. (2012). Socially Mediated Publicness: An Introduction, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media56(3): 320–329.
8.
BlumerH. (1986). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
9.
BondI., Grieg-GranM., Wertz-KanounnikoffS., HazlewoodP., WunderS., and AngelsenA. (2009). Incentives to Sustain Forest Ecosystem Services: Review and Lessons for REDD, London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
10.
BuntenA.C. (2010). More Like Ourselves: Indigenous Capitalism Through Tourism, The American Indian Quarterly34(3): 285–311.
11.
CastellsM. (1996). Rise of the Network Society, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
12.
CherletJ. (2014). Epistemic and Technological Determinism in Development Aid, Science, Technology and Human Values39(6): 773–794.
13.
ChoC.H., and RobertsR.W. (2010). Environmental Reporting on the Internet by America's Toxic 100: Legitimacy and Self-presentation, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems11(1): 1–16.
14.
ConklinB.A. (1997). Body Paint, Feathers, and VCRs: Aesthetics and Authenticity in Amazonian Activism, American Ethnologist24(4): 711–737.
15.
GiddensA. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
GoffmanE. (1956). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
17.
HayesN., and RajãoR. (2011). Competing Institutional Logics and Sustainable Development: The Case of Geographic Information Systems in Brazil's Amazon Region, Journal of Information Technology for Development17(1): 4–23.
18.
HayesN., and WalshamG. (2000). Safe Enclaves, Political Enclaves and Knowledge Working, in PrichardC., HullR., ChumerM., and WillmottH. (eds.) Managing Knowledge; Critical Investigations of Work and Learning, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 69–87.
19.
HeeksR. (2002). Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations, The Information Society18(1): 101–112.
20.
HineC. (2000). Virtual Ethnography, London: Sage.
21.
HoganB. (2010). The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online, Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society30(6): 377–386.
22.
JamesJ. (2004). Reconstruing the Digital Divide from the Perspective of a Large, Poor, Developing Country, Journal of Information Technology19(3): 172–177.
23.
KintischE. (2007). Carbon Emissions: Improved Monitoring of Rainforests Helps Pierce Haze of Deforestation, Science316(5824): 536–537.
24.
LatourB. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
LauferW.S. (2003). Social Accountability and Corporate Greenwashing, Journal of Business Ethics43(3): 253–261.
26.
LeeuwJ.D., GeorgiadouY., KerleNorman, de GierA., InoueY., FerwerdaJ., … NarantuyaD. (2010). The Function of Remote Sensing in Support of Environmental Policy, Remote Sensing2(7): 1731–1750.
27.
LittE. (2012). Knock, Knock. Who's There? The Imagined Audience, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media56(3): 330–345.
28.
LyonD. (ed.). (2003). Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk, and Digital Discrimination, London: Routledge.
29.
MoragaA.C. (2010). AA Sacred Mountain and the Art of “Impression Management”: Analyzing a Mining Company's Encounter with Indigenous Communities in Atacama, Chile. Mountain Research and Development30(4): 391–397.
30.
MoutinhoP., SantilliM., SchwartzmanS., and RodriguesL. (2005). Why Ignore Tropical Deforestation? A Proposal for Including Forest Conservation in the Kyoto Protocol, Unasylva222(56): 27–30.
31.
NepstadD., Soares-FilhoB.S., MerryF., LimaA., MoutinhoP., CarterJ. (2009). The End of Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon, Science326(5958): 1350–1351.
32.
NeuD., WarsameH., and PedwellK. (1998). Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports, Accounting, Organizations and Society23(3): 265–282.
NoirC., and WalshamG. (2007). The Great Legitimizer: ICT as Myth and Ceremony in the Indian Healthcare Sector, Information Technology and People20(4): 313–333.
35.
NorrisP. (2001). Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
PearsonE. (2009). All the World Wide Web's a Stage: The Performance of Identity in Online Social Networks, First Monday14(3). http://firstmonday.org/article/view/2162/2127 (accessed 12 Nov 2014).
37.
PinchT. (1992). Opening Black Boxes: Science, Technology and Society, Social Studies of Science22(3): 487–510.
38.
PuriS.K. (2006). Technological Frames of Stakeholders Shaping the SDI Implementation: A Case Study from INDIA, Information Technology for Development12(4): 311–331.
39.
RajãoR., and GeorgiadouY. (2014). Blame Games in the Amazon: Environmental Crises and the Emergence of a Transparency Regime in BrazilGlobal Environmental Politics14(4): 97–115.
40.
RajãoR., and HayesN. (2009). Conceptions of Control and IT Artifacts: An Institutional Account of the Amazon Rainforest Monitoring System, Journal of Information Technology24(4): 320–331.
41.
RajãoR., and VurdubakisT. (2013). On the Pragmatics of Inscription: Detecting Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon, Theory, Culture and Society30(4): 151–177.
42.
SahayS., and AvgerouC. (2002). Introducing the Special Issue on Information and Communication Technologies in Developing Countries, The Information Society18(2): 73–76.
43.
Sanz-SanchezM., HeroldM., and PenmanJ. (2013). Conference Report: REDD+ Related Forest Monitoring Remains a Key Issue: A Report Following the Recent UN Climate Conference in Doha, Carbon Management4(2): 125–127.
ThompsonM. (2008). ICT and Development Studies: Towards Development 2.0, Journal of International Development20(6): 821–835.
46.
TurnerT. (1992). Representing, Resisting, Rethinking: Historical Transformations of Kayapó and Anthropological Consciousness, in StockingG.W. (ed.) Colonial Situations: Essays on the Contextualization of Ethnographic Knowledge, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
47.
van der HoffR., RajãoR., LeroyP., and BoezemanD. (2015). The Parallel Materialization of REDD+ Implementation Discourses in Brazil, Forest Policy and Economics55: 37–45.
48.
VeberH. (1992). Why Indians Wear Clothes: Managing Identity Across an Ethnic Boundary, Ethnos57(1-2): 51–60.
49.
WalshamG. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, New York: Wiley.
50.
WalshamG., and SahayS. (1999). GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities, MIS Quarterly23(1): 39–65.
51.
WalshamG., and SahayS. (2006). Research on Information Systems in Developing Countries: Current Landscape and Future Prospects, Information Technology for Development12(1): 7–24.
52.
World Bank (2012). Information and Communications for Development 2012: Maximizing Mobile, Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
53.
ZhengY. (2009). Different Spaces for E-development: What Can We Learn from the Capability Approach?Information Technology for Development15(2): 66–82.
