The late 20th century has seen unions in the industrial and postindustrial countries retrench and struggle to develop new strategies and tactics in the face of a changing political economy. A challenge to the traditional conceptions of the appropriate place and scope of union activity comes from the Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees and its innovative leadership in the US-based Stop Sweatshops Campaign. Based on an analysis of the shifting locus of power in the garment industry, the union shifted its focus from the point of production to the place of consumption to pressure retailers who set prices within the industry. This strategy, which fulfills the prophecy of the consumptive turn earlier this century, applies a new geography and politics to labor struggles, and forces labor geographers to consider anew the relationship between consumption and production in our understanding of the changing economic landscape.
References
1.
AIP1, “Apparel Industry Partnership Report”; copy available from Stop Sweatshops, c/o UNITE, 815 16th Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
2.
AIP2, “Apparel Industry Partnership, Workplace Code of Conduct and Principles of Monitoring”; copy available from Stop Sweatshops, c/o UNITE, 815 16th Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
3.
BermanL L, 1998, “In your face, in your space: Spatial strategies in organizing clerical workers at Yale”, in Organizing the Landscape: Geographical Perspectives on Labor Unionism Ed. HerodA, (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN) pp 203–224
4.
BeynonHHudsonR, 1993, “Place and space in contemporary Europe: Some lessons and reflections”Antipode25177–190
5.
BoyleE, 1997, “Press release”, City of North Olmstead, Office of the Mayor, 17th February; copy available from Stop Sweatshops, c/o UNITE, 815 16th Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
6.
ClarkG, 1989Unions and Communities under Siege: American Communities and the Crisis of Organized Labour (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge)
7.
CLR, 1997, “Garment production in Haitan export processing zones”, Action Alert, 8 July, Campaign for Labor Rights, 1247 E Street SE, Washington, DC 20003
8.
CopeM, 1998, “Working steady: Gender, ethnicity and change in households, communities, and labor markets in Lawrence, Massachusetts, 1930–1940”, in Organizing the Landscape: Geographical Perspectives on Labor Unionism Ed. HerodA, (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN) pp 297–324
FigueroaH J, 1998, “International labor solidarity in an era of global competition”, in A New Labor Movement for the New Century Ed. MantsiosG, (Monthly Review Press, New York) pp 304–319
11.
FitzgeraldJ, 1991, “Class as community: The new dynamics of social change”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space9117–128
12.
FraserS, 1991Labor Will Rule: Sidney Hillman and the Rise of American Labor (Free Press, New York)
13.
GlickmanL, 1997A Living Wage: American Workers and the Making of Consumer Society (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
14.
GolodnerL, 1997, White House Press Conference statement, 14th April; copy available from Stop Sweatshops, c/o UNITE, 815 16th Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
15.
HarveyD, 1982The Limits to Capital (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
16.
HarveyD, 1985, “The geopolitics of capitalism”, in Social Relations and Spatial Structures Eds GregoryDUrryJ, (St Martin's Press, New York) pp 312–341
17.
HarveyP J, 1996, Statement of the United Methodist General Board of Ministries, 22nd October; copy available from Stop Sweatshops, c/o UNITE, 815 16th Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
18.
HerodA, 1991, “Local political practice in response to a manufacturing plant closure: How geography complicates class analysis”Antipode23385–402
19.
HerodA, 1997, “From a geography of labor to a labor geography: Labor's spatial fix and the geography of capitalism”Antipode291–31
20.
HerodA, (Ed.), 1998Organizing the Landscape: Geographical Perspectives on Labor Unionism (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
21.
HudsonJ, 1991, “The practice of solidarity”South African Labour Bulletin April, pages 40–43
22.
HudsonRSadlerD, 1986, “Contesting work closures in Western Europe's old industrial regions: Defending place or betraying class?”, in Production, Work, Territory: The Geographical Anatomy of Industrial Capitalism Eds ScottAStorperM, (Allen and Unwin, Boston, MA) pp 172–194
23.
JohnsR A, 1998, “Bridging the gap between class and space: US worker solidarity with Guatemala”Economic Geography74252–271
24.
JonasA E, 1998, “Investigating the local–global paradox: Corporate strategy, union local autonomy, and community action in Chicago”, in Organizing the Landscape: Geographical Perspectives on Labor Unionism Ed. HerodA, (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN) pp 325–350
25.
MacMillanJ, 1996, “Sweatshop Christmas: Nice gift, but was it made by kids or exploited workers?”U.S. News and World Report 16th December, pages 51–60
26.
MartinRSunleyPWillsJ, 1994, “Unions and the politics of deindustrialization: Some comments on how geography complicates class analysis”Antipode2659–76
27.
MasseyD, 1984Spatial Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production (Macmillan, London)
28.
MasseyD, 1995Spatial Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production 2nd edition (Macmillan, London)
29.
MazurJ, 1997, “Remarks by Jay Mazur, President, UNITE, the White House”, 14 April; copy available from Stop Sweatshops, c/o UNITE, 815 16th Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
30.
NCL, 1996, “Sample letter from Jay Mazur and Linda Golodny”, 10th May, National Consumers League, 1701 K Street NW, Suite 1200, Washington, DC 20006
31.
PalloixC, 1977, “The self-expansion of capital on a world scale”The Review of Radical Political Economics91–28
32.
PeckJ, 1996Work Place: The Social Regulation of Labor Markets (Guilford Press, New York)
33.
ReichR, 1996, “National religious leaders join with Labor Secretary to eliminate sweatshops”, press statement, 22nd October; copy available from Stop Sweatshops, c/o UNITE, 815 16th Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
34.
ShailorBKourpiasG, 1998, “Developing and enforcing international labor standards”, in A New Labor Movement for the New Century Ed. MantsiosG, (Monthly Review Press, New York) pp 277–285
35.
SheinkmanJ, 1990, “The challenge to business and labor of competing in a global economy”, speech given at the University of Louisville, 5th October, while Sheinkman was still President of ACTWU; copy held in ACTWU Archives, UNITE, 218 West 40th Street, 5th Floor, New York, NY 10018
36.
SmithN, 1990Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space 2nd edition (Blackwell, Oxford)
37.
SojaE, 1989Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory (Verso, New York)
38.
SSC1, “The Stop Sweatshops Act of 1997”, flyer; copy available from Stop Sweatshops, c/o UNITE, 815 16th Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
39.
SSC2, “Sample letter to Alfred Angelo Company President Vincent Piccione”; copy available from Stop Sweatshops, c/o UNITE, 815 16th Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
40.
SSC3, “A call to action: Partnership for responsibility”, flyer available from SSC, c/o UNITE, 815 16th street NW, Washington, DC 20006
41.
The Stop Sweatshops Act, 1997, United States Congress, House of Representatives 23
42.
TuftsS, 1998, “Community unionism in Canada and labor's (re)organization of space”Antipode30227–250
43.
UNITE, 1998, “UNITE statement on the Apparel Industry Partnership”, 5th November, Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees, UNITE, 218 West 40th Street, 5th Floor, New York, NY 10018
44.
VuralL, 1994Unionism as a Way of Life: The Community Orientation of the International Ladies Garment Workers Union and the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of AmericaDoctoral dissertation, Department of Geography, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
45.
WillsJ, 1998, “Space, place, and tradition in working-class organization”, in Organizing the Landscape: Geographical Perspectives on Labor Unionism Ed. HerodA, (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN) pp 129–158
