The field of development studies has produced a number of institutional ethnographies in recent years that evaluate the internal workings of development agencies such as the World Bank or grassroots social organizations. Although within the social sciences research on conservation often emphasizes the power of international conservation institutions, there have been few comparable studies assessing the internal workings of these organizations. In addition, less is known about the specific activities of national and provincial conservation agencies operating in the Global South. Ethnographies of these institutions are also needed in order to examine how conservation is variously understood and executed by organizations within different contexts. This paper presents an institutional ethnography of the Mpumalanga Parks Board, which is the chief conservation agency operating in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. Following the 1994 democratic elections, the Mpumalanga Parks Board pursued a neoliberal commercialized conservation mandate that reflected the position of natural resource management in relation to other national priorities. This paper traces out the construction of the commercialization discourse in order to understand the internal and external factors that produced it while assessing its implications for nature preservation. Although the commercialization drive emulated a general trend towards neoliberal decentralization in the Global South, I argue that its particular manifestations were deeply embedded in South Africa's particular spatial economy and history of racial segregation. In tracing out the commercialization discourse from within the conservation agency itself, this paper assists in an understanding of how neoliberalism shapes natural resource management and can become hegemonic at the expense of other possibilities.
References
1.
AdamsW M, 2001Green Development: Environment and Sustainability in the Third World (Routledge, London).
2.
AdamsW MMulliganM (Eds), 2003Decolonizing Nature: Strategies for Conservation in a Post-colonial Era (Earthscan, London).
3.
AgrawalA, 2005Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects (Duke University Press, Durham, NC).
4.
AgrawalAGibsonC C, 2001, “Introduction: The role of community in natural resource conservation”, in Communities and the Environment: Ethnicity, Gender, and the State in Community-based Conservation Eds AgrawalAGibsonC C (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ) pp 1–31.
BebbingtonA, 2000, “Reencountering development: Livelihood transitions and place transformations in the Andes”Annals of the Association of American Geographers90495–520.
10.
BebbingtonA, 2004, “NGOs and uneven development: Geographies of development intervention”Progress in Human Geography28725–745.
11.
BebbingtonAKothariU, 2006, “Transnational development networks”Environment and Planning A38849–866.
12.
BebbingtonAGuggenheimSOlsonEWoolcockM, 2004, “Exploring social capital debates at the World Bank”Journal of Development Studies40(5) 33–64.
13.
BebbingtonA JWoolcockMGuggenheimSOlsonE A (Eds), 2006The Search for Empowerment: Social Capital as Idea and Practice at the World Bank (Kumarian, Bloomfield, CT).
14.
BekDBinnsTNelE, 2004, “‘Catching the development train’: Perspectives on ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ development in post-apartheid South Africa”Progress in Development Studies422–46.
15.
BrechinS RWilshusenP RFortwanglerC LWestP C (Eds), 2003Contested Nature: Promoting International Biodiversity with Social Justice in the Twenty-first Century (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY).
16.
BrosiusJ PTsingA LZernerC (Eds), 2005Communities and Conservation: Histories and Politics of Community-based Natural Resource Management (AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA).
17.
Business Day1999, “Parks board cash siphoned off to ANC bodies”, 8 February, page 4.
18.
CampbellM L, 1998, “Institutional ethnography and experience as data”Qualitative Sociology2155–73.
19.
CarruthersJ, 1995The Kruger National Park: A Social and Political History (University of Natal Press, Pietermaritzburg).
20.
ChapinM2004, “A challenge to conservationists”World Watch November/December, pages 17–31.
21.
Citizen1997, “Heritage” 29 January.
22.
ColemanJ S, 1988, “Social capital in the creation of human capital”American Journal of Sociology94Supplement, S95–S120.
23.
CooperFPackardR, 1997, “Introduction”, in International Development and the Social Sciences: Essays on the History and Politics of Knowledge Eds CooperFPackardR (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 1–41.
24.
DACE, 2000, “Terms of reference for Parks Board restructuring”, unpublished document, Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Environment.
25.
Eastern Transvaal Parks Board Act, 1995, Office of the Premier.
26.
EmmerijLJollyRWeissT G, 2005, “Economic and social thinking at the UN in historical perspective”Development and Change36211–235.
27.
FineD, 1998, “Gray's suspension still hanging in the balance”Business Day 15 September.
28.
GardnerKLewisD, 2000, “Dominant paradigms overturned or ‘business as usual’? Development discourse and the white paper on international development”Critique of Anthropology2015–29.
29.
GhimireK BPimbertM P (Eds), 1997Social Change and Conservation: Environmental Politics and Impacts of National Parks and Protected Areas (Earthscan, London).
30.
GoldmanM, 2005Imperial Nature: The World Bank and Struggles for Social Justice in the Age of Globalization (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
31.
GrahameP R, 1998, “Ethnography, institutions, and the problematic of the everyday world”Human Studies21347–360.
32.
GrayA, 1997, “Ligwalagwala community reserve media launch: Key note speech Alan Gray”, unpublished document.
33.
GrayA, 1998, “The Dolphin deal: The real issues behind the ‘controversy’!”, unpublished document, 17 March.
HartG, 2002Disabling Globalization: Places of Power in Post-apartheid South Africa (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
36.
HoneyM, 1999Ecotourism and Sustainable Development: Who Owns Paradise? (Island Press, Washington, DC).
37.
HulmeDMurphreeM (Eds), 2001African Wildlife and Livelihoods: The Promise and Performance of Community Conservation (Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH).
38.
KanburR, 2001, “Economic policy, distribution and poverty: The nature of disagreements”World Development291083–1094.
39.
KingB H, 2005, “Spaces of change: Tribal authorities in the former KaNgwane homeland, South Africa”Area3764–72.
40.
KingB H, 2007a, “Conservation and community in the new South Africa: A case study of the Mahushe Shongwe Game Reserve”Geoforum38207–219.
41.
KingB H, 2007b, “Developing KaNgwane: Geographies of segregation and integration in the new South Africa”The Geographical Journal17313–25.
42.
LevinRMkhabelaS, 1997, “The chieftaincy, land allocation, and democracy”, in No More Tears: Struggles for Land in Mpumalanga, South Africa Eds LevinRWeinerD (Africa World Press, Trenton, NJ) pp 153–173.
43.
LewisDMosseD (Eds), 2006Development Brokers and Translators: The Ethnography of Aid and Agencies (Kumarian, Bloomfield, CT).
44.
LewisDBebbingtonA JBatterburyS P JShahAOlsonESiddiqiM SDuvallS, 2003, “Practice, power and meaning: Frameworks for studying organizational culture in multi-agency rural development projects”Journal of International Development15541–557.
45.
Lowvelder2001, “Premier wants report on MPB”, 9 October.
46.
MagomeHMurombedziJ, 2003, “Sharing South African national parks: Community land and conservation in a democratic South Africa”, in Decolonizing Nature: Strategies for Conservation in a Post-colonial Era Eds AdamsW MMulliganM (Earthscan, London) pp 108–134.
47.
MosseD, 2005Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice (Pluto Press, London).
48.
MPB, 1998, “Community leaders support commercialization of Loskop Dam Nature Reserve”, press release, 29 June, Mpumalanga Parks Board, Halls Gateway, N4 National Road, Nelspruit.
49.
MPB, 2000, “Game and nature reserves”, unpublished document, Mpumalanga Parks Board, Halls Gateway, N4 National Road, Nelspruit.
50.
MurombedziJ, 2003, “Devolving the expropriation of nature: The ‘devolution’ of wildlife management in southern Africa”, in Decolonizing Nature: Strategies for Conservation in a Post-colonial Era Eds AdamsW MMulliganM (Earthscan, London) pp 135–151.
51.
MykhalovskiyEMcCoyL, 2002, “Troubling ruling discourses of health: Using institutional ethnography in community-based research”Critical Public Health1217–37.
52.
NeumannR P, 1998Imposing Wilderness: Struggles over Livelihood and Nature Preservation in Africa (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
53.
NtsebezaL, 2000, “Traditional authorities, local government and land rights,” in At the Crossroads: Land and Agrarian Reform in South Africa into the 21st Century Ed. CousinsB, Programme for Land and Agrarian Studies, Cape Town, pp 280–305.
54.
PelusoN L, 1993, “Coercing conservation: The politics of state resource control,” in The State and Social Power in Global Environmental Politics Eds LipschutzRConcaK (Columbia University Press, New York) pp 46–70.
55.
PerreaultT, 2001, “Developing identities: Indigenous mobilization, rural livelihoods, and resource access in Ecuadorian Amazonia”Ecumene8381–413.
56.
PerreaultT, 2003a, “‘A people with our own identity’: Toward a cultural politics of development in Ecuadorian Amazonia”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space21583–606.
57.
PerreaultT, 2003b, “Changing places: Transnational networks, ethnic politics, and community development in the Ecuadorian Amazon”Political Geography2261–88.
58.
PicklesJWeinerD, 1991, “Rural and regional restructuring of apartheid: Ideology, development policy and the competition for space”Antipode232–32.
59.
PutnamR D, 1993Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
60.
RanganHGilmartinM, 2002, “Gender, traditional authority, and the politics of rural reform in post-apartheid South Africa”Development and Change33633–658.
61.
RogersonC M, 2001, “Spatial development initiatives in Southern Africa: The Maputo Development Corridor”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie92324–346.
62.
RogersonC M, 2002, “Tourism—a new economic driver for South Africa”, in Geography and Economy in South Africa and its Neighbours Eds LemonARogersonC M (Ashgate, Burlington, VT) pp 95–110.
63.
SchroederR A, 1999, “Geographies of environmental intervention in Africa”Progress in Human Geography23359–378.
64.
SchroederR ANeumannR P, 1995, “Manifest ecological destinies: Local rights and global environmental agendas”Antipode27321–324.
65.
Sighubu1996a, “Commercialisation: There's no way of avoiding it”, September, pages 4–5.
66.
Sighubu1996b, “International leisure giant keen on Parks Board proposals”, September.
67.
SlaterR, 2002, “Between a rock and a hard place: Contested livelihoods in Qwaqwa national park, South Africa”The Geographical Journal168116–129.
68.
SongorwaA N, 1999, “Community-based wildlife management (CWM) in Tanzania: Are the communities interested?”World Development272061–2079.
69.
SongorwaA NBührsTHugheyK F D, 2000, “Community-based wildlife management in Africa: A critical assessment of the literature”Natural Resources Journal40603–643.
70.
Star1998, “Discredited adviser's links to Gray probed”, 12 September.
71.
TapelaB NOmara-OjunguP H, 1999, “Towards bridging the gap between wildlife conservation and rural development in post-apartheid South Africa: The case of the Makuleke community and the Kruger National Park”South African Geographical Journal81148–155.
72.
Task Team, 2000, “Re-engineering the Mpumalanga Parks Board”, unpublished report.
73.
TendlerJ, 1997Good Government in the Tropics (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD).
74.
Timbila1999, “The road ahead: Interview with Mavuso Msimang”1(1) 36–39.
75.
WadeR H, 2001, “Making the world development report 2000: Attacking poverty”World Development291435–1441.
WolfordW, 2004, “This land is ours now: Spatial imaginaries in the struggle for land in Brazil”Annals of the Association of American Geographers94409–424.
78.
WoolcockMNarayanD, 2000, “Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy”World Bank Research Observer15225–249.
79.
ZernerC (Ed.), 2000People, Plants, and Justice: The Politics of Nature Conservation (Columbia University Press, New York).
80.
ZimmererK S, 2006a, “Cultural ecology: At the interface with political ecology—the new geographies of environmental conservation and globalization”Progress in Human Geography3063–78.
81.
ZimmererK S (Ed.), 2006bGlobalization and New Geographies of Conservation (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
