Land-use-change drivers related to institutional dynamics, including historical path dependencies and political dynamics associated with urban land transformation, are difficult to relate to specific spatial locations and thus are not easily included in spatial models of urban land-use change. In this paper we describe a land-use model with variables representing such institutional dynamics in the Greater Boston region, a metropolitan area characterized by periurban sprawl, for the period 1985–99. An aggregate land-use model is developed at the municipal level, based on a narrative analysis drawn from in-depth interviews with town planners, state officials, and land developers, to explain land-development patterns documented over that study period using aerial photography. Explanatory variables, including town financial variables, school quality measures, and spatial variables associated with access and location, are linked to land-change outcomes through the selection environment framework, a framework borrowed from economic geography to describe how regional growth patterns are shaped by locally specific institutional, market, and spatial contexts that constrain individual land-use decision makers. Results of the analysis suggest that institutional dynamics associated with housing values and associated tax revenues, educational expenditures, and exclusive zoning practices significantly explain municipal land-use change in the suburban or periurban context.
AldrichSWalkerRSimmonsCCaldasMPerzS, 2012, “Contentious land change in the Amazon's arc of deforestation”Annals of the Association of American Geographers102103–128
BarronD JFrugG ESuR T, 2004Dispelling the Myth of Home Rule (Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston, Cambridge, MA)
4.
BattyM, 1993, “Urban modeling in computer-graphic and geographic information system environments”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design19663–688
5.
BockstaelN, 1996, “Modeling economics and ecology: The importance of a spatial perspective”American Journal of Agricultural Economics781168–1180
6.
BoschmaR ALambooyJ G, 1999, “Evolutionary economics and economic geography”Journal of Evolutionary Economics9411–429
7.
BradyMIrwinE, 2011, “Accounting for spatial effects in economic models of land use: Recent developments and challenges ahead”Environmental and Resource Economics48487–509
8.
BriassoulisH, 2008, “Land-use policy and planning, theorizing, and modeling: Lost in translation, found in complexity?”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design3516–33
9.
BrownD GRioloRRobinsonD TNorthMRandW, 2005, “Spatial processes and data models: Toward integration of agent-based models and GIS”Journal of Geographical Systems725–47
10.
BrownD GRobinsonD TAnLNassauerJ IZellnerMRandWRioloRPageS ELowBWangZ, 2008, “Exurbia from the bottom-up: Confronting empirical challenges to characterizing a complex system”Geoforum39805–818
CañasIAyugaEAyugaF, 2009, “A contribution to the assessment of scenic quality of landscapes based on preferences expressed by the public”Land Use Policy261173–1181
13.
ChowdhuryR RTurnerB LII, 2006, “Reconciling agency and structure in empirical analysis: Smallholder land use in the Southern Yucatan, Mexico”Annals of the Association of American Geographers96302–322
14.
CohenJ, 1960, “A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales”Educational and Psycological Measurement2037–46
15.
CouclelisH, 2005, “Where has the future gone? Rethinking the role of integrated land use models in spatial planning”Environment and Planning A371353–1371
16.
DosiGNelsonR R, 1994, “An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics”Journal of Evolutionary Economics4153–172
EssletzbichlerJ, 2009, “Evolutionary economic geography, institutions, and political economy”Economic Geography85159–165
19.
FloridaR, 2005Cities and the Creative Class (Routledge, New York)
20.
FoleyJ A, 2005, “Global consequences of land use”Science309570–574
21.
FosterDHallBBurkJ, 2003Massachusetts Historical Landcover and Census Data 1640–1999 Harvard Forest Data Archive: HF014
22.
GiddensA, 1984The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (Polity, Cambridge)
23.
GrabherG, 1993, “The weakness of strong ties: The lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area”, in The Embedded Firm: On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks Ed. GrabherG, (Routledge, London) pp 255–277
24.
GüneralpBReillyM KSetoK C, 2012, “Capturing multiscalar feedbacks in urban land change: A coupled system dynamics spatial logistic approach”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design39858–879
25.
GuthrieJ W, 1971Schools and Inequality (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
26.
HarrisonBKluverJ, 1989, “Reassessing the ‘Massachusetts miracle’: Reindustrialization and balanced growth, or convergence to ‘Manhattanization’?”Environment and Planning A21771–801
27.
IrwinE GGeogheganJ, 2001, “Theory, data, methods: Developing spatially explicit economic models of land use change”Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment857–23
28.
JiangLDengXSetoK C, 2012, “Multi-level modeling of urban expansion and cultivated land conversion for urban hotspot counties in China”Landscape and Urban Planning108131–139
29.
KingA, 2004The Structure of Social Theory (Routledge, London)
30.
KlepeisPVanceC, 2003, “Neoliberal policy and deforestation in Southeastern Mexico: An assessment of the PROCAMPO Program”Economic Geography79221–240
31.
LambinE FGeistH, 2003Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: Local Processes and Global Impacts (Springer, Berlin)
32.
LambinE FMeyfroidtP, 2010, “Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socioeconomic change”Land Use Policy27108–118
33.
LambooyJ G, 2002, “Knowledge and urban economic development: An evolutionary perspective”Urban Studies391019–1035
34.
LiraP KTambosiL REwersR MMetzgerJ P, 2012, “Land-use and land-cover change in Atlantic Forest landscapes”Forest Ecology and Management27880–89, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.05.008
35.
LiuWSetoK C, 2008, “Using the ARTMMAP neural network to model and predict urban growth: A spatialtemporal data mining approach”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design35296–317
36.
MacConnellW P, 1999Land Use (1951–1999)Office of Geographic Information (MassGIS), Boston, MA
37.
MacKinnonD, 2009, “Evolution in economic geography: Institutions, political economy, and adaptation”Economic Geography85129–150
38.
MahinyA SClarkeK C, 2012, “Guiding SLEUTH land-use/land-cover change modeling using multicriteria evaluation: Towards dynamic sustainable land-use planning”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design39925–944
39.
MansonS M, 2005, “Agent-based modeling and genetic programming for modeling land use change in the Southern Yucatan Peninsular Region of Mexico”Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment11147–62
MurphyJ T, 2006, “The sociospatial dynamics of creativity and production in Tanzanian industry: Urban furniture manufacturers in a liberalizing economy”Environment and Planning A381863–1882
42.
NagendraHMunroeD KSouthworthJ, 2004, “From pattern to process: Landscape fragmentation and the analysis of land use/land cover change”Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment101111–115
43.
NelsonR RWinterS G, 1982An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
44.
NorthD, 1990Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
45.
ObertiM, 2007, “Social and school differentiation in urban space: Inequalities and local configurations”Environment and Planning A39208–227
46.
O'SullivanDHaklayM, 2000, “Agent-based models and individualism: Is the world agent-based?”Environment and Planning A321409–1425
47.
ParkerD CMansonS MJanssenM AHoffmannM JDeadmanP J, 2003, “Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: A review”Annals of the Association of American Geographers93314–337
48.
RobbinsP, 2001, “Tracking invasive species covers in India, or why our landscapes have never been modern”Annals of the Association of American Geographers91637–659
49.
RosanCSusskindL, 2007, “Land-use planning in the doldrums: Growth management in Massachusetts' I-495 region”, Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston, Cambridge, MA
50.
SableM, 2007, “The impact of the biotechnology industry on local economic development in the Boston and San Diego metropolitan areas”Technological Forecasting and Social Change7436–60
51.
SaxenianA, 1994Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Harvard University Press, Boston, MA)
52.
SetoK CKaufmanR K, 2003, “Modeling the drivers of urban land use change in the Pearl River Delta, China”Land Economics79106–121
53.
Suarez-RubioMLookinbillT RWaingerL A, 2012, “Modeling exurban development near Washington, DC, USA: Comparision of a pattern-based model and a spatially-explicit econometric model”Landscape Ecology271045–1061
54.
TuJ, 2009, “Combined impact of climate and land use changes on streamflow and water quality in eastern Massachusetts, USA”Journal of Hydrology379268–283
55.
TurnerB LGeogheganJFosterD, (Eds), 2003Integrated Land-Change Science and Tropical Deforestation in the Southern Yucatan: Final Frontiers (Oxford University Press, New York)
56.
VieraA JGarrettJ M, 2005, “Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic”Family Medicine37360–363
57.
Von ThünenJ H, 1966Isolated State (Pergamon Press, Oxford)
58.
WalkerRSoleckiW, 2004, “Theorizing land-cover and land-use change: The case of the Florida Everglades and its degradation”Annals of the Association of American Geographers94311–328
59.
WhiteREngelenG, 1993, “Cellular automata and fractal urban form: A cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns”Environment and Planning A251175–1199
