Decentralisation to local governments has acquired new dimensions. These dimensions refer to delivery of basic services as well as to public or collective demands and goals. Enablement is central to new decentralisation in which the role of government is to facilitate and regulate the overall framework within which other actors can make their most effective contribution. After situating decentralisation, I explore the notion of enablement. Subsequently the concept of local-government enablement of communities is operationalised. Criteria are formulated and applied to a (nonrepresentative) sample of local governments in seven countries. It is concluded that introducing enablement in local planning is comparatively easy. However, changing regulatory, administrative and financial public decisionmaking processes is much more difficult. In the final part of the paper I examine a number of issues in the local-governance debate. Decentralisation to local government takes place in the context of decentralisation to market and to communities. Issues are identified on the supply and demand sides of governance, and on the question of embedding of government. New decentralisation raises a new class of problems, for which, as yet, few answers are available.
References
1.
BakenRRaoMU, 1995The Bhaskara Rao Peta Connection: Low-income Housing and Relocation in Vijayawada, India: The View of Slum Dwellers and Slum Leaders (Free University, Amsterdam)
2.
BakenRvan der LindenJ, 1992Land Delivery for Low Income Groups in Third World Cities (Avebury, Aldershot, Hants)
3.
BennettRJ, 1990Decentralization to Local Governments and Markets. Towards a Post-welfare Agenda (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
4.
BurgessRCarmonaMKolsteeT, 1994, “Urban strategies and urban design”, position paper prepared for the international seminar The Hidden Assignment (Publikatieburo Bouwkunde, Delft)
5.
BurgessRCarmonaMKolsteeT (Eds), 1997The Challenge of Sustainable Cities: Neoliberalism and Urban Strategies in Developing Countries (Zed Books, London)
6.
BurnsSHambletonRHoggettP, 1994Politics of Decentralization: Revitalising Local Democracy (Macmillan, London)
7.
ChavezD, 1998, “The Left in Latin American local politics: Decentralisation and participatory urban management in Montevideo and Porto Alegre: A comparative analysis”, Institute of Social Studies, PO Box 29776, 2502 LT The Hague
8.
CostonJM, 1998, “Administrative avenues to democratic governance: The balance of supply and demand”Public Administration and Development18479493
9.
de Sousa SantosB, 1998, “Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a redistributive democracy”Politics and Society26461510
10.
DevasNRakodiC, 1993Managing Fast Growing Cities: New Approaches to Urban Planning and Management in the Developing World (Longman Singapore, Singapore)
11.
DiaM, 1996Africa's Management in the 1990s and Beyond: Reconciling Indigenous and Transplanted Institutions (World Bank, Washington, DC)
12.
EvansP, 1996a, “Introduction: Development strategies across the public—private divide”World Development2410331037
13.
EvansP, 1996b, “Government action, social capital and development: Reviewing the evidence on synergy”World Development2411191132
14.
HanmerLPyattGWhiteH, 1997Poverty in Sub Saharan Africa. What can we Learn from the World Bank Poverty Assessments?Institute of Social Studies Advisory Services, PO Box 29776, 2502 LT The Hague
15.
HarrisN (Ed.), 1992Cities in the 1990s: The Challenge for Developing Countries (UCL Press, London)
16.
HelmsingAHJ, 1996, “South Africa: Post-apartheid restructuring of government—which way? Reflections on international experiences”, in Restructuring the State and Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in South Africa Eds HelmsingAHJMogaleThHunterREbertFriedrich Stiftung in association with the Graduate School for Public and Development Management, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, pp 2548
17.
HelmsingAHJ, 1997, “Government enablement and planning”, in Locality, State and Development: Essays in the Honour of Jos G.M.Hilhorst Eds HelmsingAHJGuimaraesJInstitute of Social Studies, PO Box 29776, 2502 LT The Hague
18.
HelmsingAHJ, 1999, “Decentralisation and emerging patterns of local governance: A comparative analysis of Uganda, Zimbabwe and Zambia”, WP4, Regional Development Studies, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa
19.
HelmsingAHJVan den BoschL, 1997Government Enablement: A Review of the LiteratureInstitute of Social Studies Advisory Services, PO Box 29776, 2502LT, The Hague
20.
HelmsingAHJWekweteKH (Eds), 1990Subnational Planning in Southern and Eastern Africa. Approaches, Finance and Education (Gower, Aldershot, Hants)
21.
HirstP, 1994Associative Democracy. New Forms of Economic and Social Governance (Polity Press, Cambridge)
22.
KettleDF, 1993Sharing Power: Public Governance and Private Markets (The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC)
23.
KortenDCKlaussR, 1984People-centred Development: Contributions Toward Theory and Planning Frameworks (Kumarian Press, West Hartford, CT)
24.
LeeKSGilbertR, 1999Developing Towns and Cities: Lessons from Brazil and the Philippines (World Bank, Washington, DC)
25.
LitvackJAhmadJBirdR, 1998Rethinking Decentralisation in Developing Countries, sector studies series PREM (World Bank, Washington, DC)
26.
LudekingGWilliamsC, 1999, “Poverty, participation and government enablement: A summary of the findings, lessons learned and recommendations of the UNCHS (Habitat) and the Institute of Social Studies evaluation research (1996–1998)”, United Nations Center for Human Settlements, Nairobi
27.
MitraBCNientiedP, 1989Land Supply and Housing Expenses for Low Income Families: A Rationale for Government Intervention (Free University, Amsterdam)
O'ReillyCA (Ed.), 1995New Paths to Democratic Development in Latin America: The Rise of NGO—Municipal Collaboration (Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO)
30.
RhodesA, 1999, “Governance and networks”, in The New Management of British Local Governance Ed. StokerG (Macmillan, London)
31.
Schiavo-CampoS, 1998, “Government employment and pay: The global and regional evidence”Public Administration and Development18457478
32.
SchneiderH, 1999, “Participatory governance for poverty reduction”Journal of International Development11521534
33.
SmithB, 2000, “The concept of an ‘enabling’ local authority”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy187994
34.
StokerG, 1998, “Governance as theory: Five propositions”Governance11(1) 1528
35.
StokerG, 1999, “The unintended cost and benefits of new management reform for British local government”, in The New Management of British Local Governance Ed. StokerG (Macmillan, London)
UNCHS, United Nations Center for Human Settlements, Nairobi
38.
UNCHS, United Nations Center for Human Settlements1989aDecentralization Policies and Human Settlements Development
39.
UNCHS, United Nations Center for Human Settlements1989bImproving Income and Housing: Employment Generation in Low-income Settlements
40.
UNCHS, United Nations Center for Human Settlements1990The Global Strategy for Shelter to the Year 2000
41.
UNCHS, United Nations Center for Human Settlements1991Evaluating Experiences with Initiating Enabling Shelter Strategies
42.
UNCHS, United Nations Center for Human Settlements1993Public/Private Partnerships in Enabling Shelter Strategies
43.
UNDP, United Nations Development Programme1990Human Development Report 1990 (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
44.
UNDP, United Nations Development Programme1991Cities, People and Poverty: Urban Development Cooperation for the 1990s (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
45.
UNDP, United Nations Development Programme1993Human Development Report 1993 (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
46.
UNDP, United Nations Development Programme1997Human Development Report 1997 (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
47.
UphoffN, 1986Local Institutional Development: An Analytical Sourcebook with Cases (Kumarian Press, West Hartford, CT)
48.
WilsFHelmsingAHJ, 1997Shadow on the Ground. The Practical Effectiveness of the Community Development ProgrammeInstitute of Social Studies Advisory Service, PO Box 29776, 2502LT The Hague
49.
WilsFVan RijnH, 1996Literature Study on the Concepts of Community Participation and Community ManagementInstitute of Social Studies Advisory Service, PO Box 29776, 2502LT, The Hague
50.
World Bank, 1991aUrban Policy and Economic Development: An Agenda for the 1990s (World Bank, Washington, DC)
51.
World Bank, 1991bWorld Development Report (Oxford University Press, New York)
52.
World Bank, 1992Governance and Development (World Bank, Washington, DC)
53.
World Bank, 1993Housing: Enabling Markets to Work (World Bank, Washington, DC)
54.
World Bank, 1994World Development Report (Oxford University Press, New York)
