E-government tools provide municipal planning departments with an alternative means to inform and engage their citizenry. We examine the use of information and communication technology e-government tools to promote citizen participation in the planning process. The analysis is based on an examination of municipal planning-related websites for the 590 US cities with a 2000 Census population of 50 000 or more. We also explore the influence which demographic contextual factors have on what tools are provided. Principal findings highlight the dominance of simple, information-based, e-government tools. The analyses also suggest that population-related and geographic-related variables are significant and pervasive influences on the provision of these tools.
References
1.
Al-KodmanyK, 1999, “Using visualization techniques for enhancing public participation in planning and design”Landscape and Urban Planning4537–45.
2.
BerkeP RConroyM M, 2000, “Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans”Journal of the American Planning Association6621–33.
3.
BerkeP RFrenchS P, 1994, “The influence of state planning on local plan quality”Journal of Planning Education and Research13237–250.
4.
BerkeP RRoenigkD JKaiserE JBurbyR, 1996, “Enhancing plan quality: Evaluating the role of state planning mandates for natural hazard mitigation”Journal of Environmental Planning and Management39(1) 79–96.
ConroyM MBerkeP R, 2004, “What makes a good sustainable development plan? An analysis of factors that influence principles of sustainable development”Environment and Planning A361381–1396.
11.
ConroyM MEvans-CowleyJ, 2005, “Informing and interaction: The use of e-government for citizen participation in planning”Journal of E-Government1(3) 73–92.
12.
ConroyM MGordonS I, 2004, “Utility of interactive computer based materials for enhancing public participation”Environmental Planning and Management47(1) 19–33.
13.
DaltonL CBurbyR J, 1994, “Mandates, plans, and planners: Building local commitment to development management”Journal of the American Planning Association60444–461.
EdmistonK D, 2003, “State and local e-government: Prospects and challenges”American Review of Public Administration33(1) 20–45.
16.
Evans-CowleyJConroyM M, 2004E-Governance: On-line Citizen Participation Tools for Planners PAS Report 525 (American Planning Association, Chicago, IL).
17.
GrantJManuelPJoudreyD, 1996, “A framework for planning sustainable residential landscapes”Journal of the American Planning Association62331–345.
18.
HealeyP, 1992, “Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory”Town Planning Review63143–162.
19.
InnesJ E, 1996, “Planning through consensus building”Journal of the American Planning Association Autumn62460–472.
20.
InnesJ EBooherD E, 1999, “Consensus building as role playing and bricolage: Toward a theory of collaborative planning”Journal of the American Planning Association659–26.
21.
KaylorCDeshazoRVan EckD, 2001, “Gauging e-government: A report on implementing services among American cities”Government Information Quarterly18293–307.
22.
KwanM PWeberJ, 2003, “Individual accessibility revisited: Implications for geographical analysis in the twenty-first century”Geographical Analysis35341–353.
23.
MacphersonL, 1999, “Joystick not included: New media technologies are ideal tools for gaining stakeholder interest, acceptance”Water Environment and Technology11(9) 51–53.
24.
MeredithT C, 1997, “Linking science with citizens: Exploring the use of geographic information and analysis in community-based biodiversity conservation initiatives”Human Ecology Review3231–237.
25.
NetRatings Inc, 2004, “Three out of four Americans have access to the Internet, according to Nielson/NetRatings”, press release, http://www.nielsen-netratings.com/news.jsp.
26.
PadgettD A, 1993, “Technological methods for improving citizen participation in locally unacceptable land use (LULU)”Decision-Making, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems17513–520.
27.
Pew Research Center, 2002, “The rise of the e-citizen. How people use government agencies' websites”, http://www.pewInternet.org.
28.
Pew Research Center, 2003, “Broadband adoption at home: A pew internet project data memo”, http://www.pewInternet.org.
29.
PotapchukW R, 1996, “Building sustainable community politics: Synergizing participatory, institutional, and representative democracy”National Civic Review85(3) 54–60.
30.
SimonsD, 1987, “Communicating with the public: An examination of national park planning workbooks”The Journal of Environmental Education199–167.
31.
SwinkMSpeierC, 1999, “Presenting geographic information: Effects of data aggregation, dispersion, and users' spatial orientation”Decision Sciences30(1) 169–195.
32.
ThomasJ CStreibG, 2003, “The new face of government: Citizen-initiated contact in the era of e-government”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory13(1) 83–102.
