The author presents a conceptual framework for the analysis of conflicting claims in the environmental policy context. It is suggested that claims can be analysed at three distinct levels: the social process of legitimisation and justification; the legal process of recognition and protection; and the political process of realisation. Outcomes depend in a complex and dynamic manner on the interaction of claims at each of these levels. An appreciation of these links may significantly enhance our understanding of the environmental policy process.
References
1.
AldredJ, 1994, “Existence value, welfare and altruism”Environmental Values3381–402
2.
BanerjiRMartinM, 1997, “Courting green”Down to Earth 15 May, pages 27–37
3.
BeckerL C, 1977Property Rights: Philosophical Foundations (Routledge and Kegan Paul, New York)
4.
BeckerL C, 1980, “The moral basis of property rights”, in Property Eds PennockJ RChapmanJ W (New York University Press, New York) pp 187–220
5.
BromleyD W, 1978, “Property rules, liability rules, and environmental economics”Journal of Economic Issues1243–60
6.
BromleyD W, 1989Economic Interests and Institutions: The Conceptual Foundations of Public Policy (Blackwell, Oxford)
7.
BromleyD W, 1991Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy (Blackwell, Oxford)
8.
BromleyD W, 1997, “Constitutional political economy: Property claims in a dynamic world”Contemporary Economic Policy1543–54
9.
CalabresiGMelamedA D, 1972, “Property rules, liability rules and inalienability: One view of the cathedral”Harvard Law Review851085–1128
10.
CaporasoJ ALevineD P, 1992Theories of Political Economy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
11.
CarterA, 1989The Philosophical Foundations of Property Rights (Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York)
12.
CostanzaRDalyH, 1992, “Natural capital and sustainable development”Conservation Biology637–46
13.
DavisS H (Ed.), 1993, “Indigenous views of land and the environment”, DP 188, The World Bank, Washington, DC
14.
DworkinR, 1978Taking Rights Seriously (Duckworth, London)
15.
EpsteinR A, 1993, “Holdouts, externalities and the single owner: One more salute to Ronald Coase”Journal of Law and Economics36553–586
16.
FernandesW (Ed.), 1996Drafting a People's Forest Bill: The Forest Dweller – Social Activist AlternativeIndian Social Institute, New Delhi
17.
FreedenM, 1991Rights (Open University Press, Milton Keynes)
GoodpasterK E, 1983, “On being morally considerable”, in Ethics and the Environment Eds SchererDAttigF (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) pp 31–39
20.
HonoréA M, 1961, “Ownership”, in Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence Ed. GuestA G (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 107–147
21.
JodhaN S, 1986, “Common property resources and rural poor in dry regions of India”Economic and Political Weekly211169–1181
22.
KhatorR, 1991Environment, Development and Politics in India (University Press of America, Lanham, MD)
23.
MacphersonC B, 1978Property: Mainstream and Critical Positions (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
24.
MunzerS R, 1990A Theory of Property (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
25.
NaessA, 1989Ecology, Community and Lifestyle: Outline of an Ecosophy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
26.
NozickR, 1974Anarchy, State and Utopia (Basic Books, New York)
27.
PearceD WTurnerR K, 1990Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment (Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
28.
RandallAFarmerM C, 1995, “Benefits, costs and the safe minimum standard of conservation”, in Handbook of Environmental Economics Ed. BromleyD W (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 26–44
29.
RawlsJ, 1993, “Distributive justice”, in Justice Ed. RyanA (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 73–94
30.
ReeveA, 1986Property (Macmillan, London)
31.
RosencranzADivanSNobleM L, 1991Environmental Law and Policy in India: Cases, Materials and Statutes (Tripathi, Bombay)
32.
RyanA, 1984Property and Political Theory (Basic Blackwell, Oxford)
33.
RyanA, 1987Property (Open University Press, Milton Keynes)
34.
SagoffM, 1983, “On preserving the natural environment”, in Ethics and the Environment Eds SchererDAttigF (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) pp 21–30
35.
SchlagerEOstromE, 1992, “Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A Conceptual analysis”Land Economics68249–262
36.
SwansonT, 1991, “The use of liability-rule systems to regulate the environment: The case for ‘preventive policy’”, in Persistent Pollutants Eds OpschoorJ BPearceD W (Kluwer Academic, Amsterdam), pp 197–202
37.
TurnerR KDoktorPAdgerN, 1994, “Sea-level rise and coastal wetlands in the UK: Mitigation strategies for sustainable development”, in Investing in Natural Capital: The Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability Eds JanssonA MHammerMFolkeCCostanzaR (Island Press, Washington, DC) pp 266–290
38.
ViraB, 1995, “Rights, property rights and their protection: implications for the analysis of environmental policy”, RP 2, Oxford Centre for the Environment, Ethics and Society, Oxford
39.
VlastosG, 1984, “Justice and equality”, in Theories of Rights Ed. WaldronJ (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 41–76
40.
VyasV SReddyV R, 1998, “Assessment of environmental policies and policy implementation in India”Economic and Political Weekly3348–54
41.
WaldronJ (Ed.), 1984Theories of Rights (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
42.
WaldronJ, 1988The Right to Private Property (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
43.
WaldronJ, 1989, “Rights in conflict”Ethics99503–519
44.
WilliamsH, 1977, “Kant's concept of property”Philosophical Quarterly2732–40
