Two themes of particular significance in the changing world of local government are examined: the growing pressures to incorporate participatory and direct forms of democracy into local government; and the varied use of a complex structure of nongovernmental organisations as part of local governance. Two main forms of democracy with participation are discussed: direct democracy and participatory democracy. Differences between them are explained and the demands for them in transitional and established democracies are described. The different ways in which ‘third sector’ bodies are involved in local governance are explored and their contribution to local democratisation assessed. Innovations in participation and the involvement of the third sector can revitalise local democracy.
References
1.
AttahiK, 1996, “Cote d'Ivoire”, in The Changing Nature of Local Government in Developing Countries Ed. McCarneyP L, Centre for Urban and Community Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, and Federation of Canadian Municipalities, pp 107–128
2.
BoukhalovOIvannikovS, 1995, “Ukrainian local politics after independence”, in Local Governance Around the World Ed. TeuneH, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science540 (July) 126–136
3.
BrentonM, 1985The Voluntary Sector in British Social Services (Longman, Harlow, Essex)
4.
BučekJ, 2000, “Sublocal decentralisation – the case of Slovak cities”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy1857–78
5.
CochraneA, 1996, “From theories to practice: Looking for local democracy in Britain”, in Rethinking Local Democracy Eds KingDStokerG, (Macmillan, London) pp 193–213
6.
CohnA, 1995, “NGOs, social movements, and the privatisation of health care: Experiences in Sao Paulo”, in New Paths to Democratic Development in Latin America. The Rise of NGO – Municipal Collaboration Ed. ReillyC A, (Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO) pp 85–94
7.
de ToquevilleA, 1835Democracy in America (1956 edition, Mentor Books, New York)
8.
FiszbeinA, 1999, “Public – private partnerships as a strategy for local capacity building: Some suggestive evidence from Latin America”, paper prepared for the Public Administration and Development Jubilee Conference, Oxford, April; copy available from the author
9.
GarciaS, 1995, “Urban communities and local political participation in Spain”, in Local Governance Around the World Ed. TeuneH, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science540 (July) 63–16
10.
GrichtchenkoJ MGritsanovA A, 1995, “The local political elite in the democratic transformation of Belarus”, in Local Governance Around the World Ed. TeuneH, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science540 (July)
11.
HambletonR, 1988, “Consumerism, decentralization and local democracy”Public Administration66(2) 125–147
12.
HernandezLFoxJ, 1995, “Mexico's difficult democracy: Grassroots movements, NGOs and local government”, in New Paths to Democratic Development in Latin America. The Rise of NGO – Municipal Collaboration Ed. ReillyC A, (Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO)
13.
HorvathT, 1997, “Local governance in human services: Case studies from Hungary as an example of Central European transformation of public administration”, paper presented to the Round Table of the International Institute of Administrative Sciences, Quebec City, July; copy available from the author
14.
ILGPS, 1994, “Local government in the CEE and CIS”, Institute for Local Government and Public Service, Budapest
15.
ImrieRRacoM, 1999, “How new is the new local governance? Lessons from the United Kingdom”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series2145–63
16.
JainR B, 1997, “Increasing effectiveness of government in developing countries: The experience of NGOs as a Third Sector in strengthening policy processes in India”, paper presented to the Round Table of the International Institute of Administrative Sciences, Quebec City, 14–17 July; copy available from the author
17.
KokpolO, 1996, “Thailand”, in The Changing Nature of Local Government in Developing Countries Ed. McCarneyP L, Centre for Urban and Community Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, and Federation of Canadian Municipalities, pp 135–168
18.
LinderW, 1991, “Local government in Switzerland: Pragmatic adaptation and self-help”, in Local Government and Urban Affairs in International Perspective Ed. HesseJ J, (Nomos Verlagsgesselschaft, Baden-Baden) pp 409–427
19.
LuanT D, 1996, “Vietnam”, in The Changing Nature of Local Government in Developing Countries Ed. McCarneyP L, Centre for Urban and Community Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, and Federation of Canadian Municipalities, pp 169–194
20.
MassoloA, 1996, “Mexico”, in The Changing Nature of Local Government in Developing Countries Ed. McCarneyP L, Centre for Urban and Community Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, and Federation of Canadian Municipalities, pp 227–252
21.
NogueiraR M, 1995, “Negotiated interactions: NGOs and local government in Rosario, Argentina”, in New Paths to Democratic Development in Latin America. The Rise of NGO – Municipal Collaboration Ed. ReillyC A, (Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO) pp 45–70
22.
OsborneS PKaposvariA, 1998, “Non-governmental organisations and the development of social services: Meeting social needs in local communities in post-communist Hungary”Public Administration and Development18365–380
23.
PintoR F, 1998, “Innovations in the provision of public goods and services”Public Administration and Development18387–398
24.
RazinE, 2000, “The impact of local government organization on development and disparities – a comparative perspective”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy1817–31
25.
ReillyC A, 1995a, “Public policy and citizenship”, in New Paths to Democratic Development in Latin America. The Rise of NGO – Municipal Collaboration Ed. ReillyC A, (Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO) pp 1–28
26.
ReillyC A, 1995b, “Topocrats, technocrats and NGOs”, in New Paths to Democratic Development in Latin America. The Rise of NGO – Municipal Collaboration Ed. ReillyC A, (Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO) pp 247–272
27.
SalinasJSolimanoG, 1995, “Chilean health NGOs”, in New Paths to Democratic Development in Latin America. The Rise of NGO – Municipal Collaboration Ed. ReillyC A, (Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO) pp 145–164
28.
SartoriG, 1995Teoria Demokracie [Theory of democracy] (Archa, Bratislava)
29.
SmithB C, 2000, “The concept of an ‘enabling’ local authority”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy1879–94
30.
SmithD MBlancM, 1997, “Grass-roots democracy and participation: A new analytical and practical approach”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space15281–303
31.
TapalesP D, 1996, “Philippines”, in The Changing Nature of Local Government in Developing Countries Ed. McCarneyP L, Centre for Urban and Community Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, and Federation of Canadian Municipalities, pp 195–219
32.
WalshK, 1996, “Public services, efficiency and local democracy”, in Rethinking Local Democracy Eds KingDStokerG, (Macmillan, London) pp 67–88
33.
WollmanH, 2000, “Local government systems: From historic divergence towards convergence? Great Britain, France and Germany as (comparative) cases in point”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy1833–55
34.
World Bank, 1996World Development Report 1996. From Plan to Market (Oxford University Press, New York)
35.
World Bank, 1997World Development Report 1997: The State in a Changing World (Oxford University Press, New York)
