In this paper we document current research into new forms of public engagement presently taking place in UK biodiversity policy. This involves locating the main participants in such patterns of engagement; namely nature, amateur naturalists, and professional biologists and conservationists. Two interwoven and mutually interdependent perspectives or ‘imaginaries’—the ‘cartographic’ and the ‘ethnographic’—are presented in the paper to explore the shaping and interpretation of such new forms of engagement. However, in this context the interest lies in the ways in which either perspective is foregrounded or backgrounded by the different parties involved. The described shifts and movements of a range of actors and processes being studied demonstrate the fluidity and instability of networks of ‘knowing nature well’, whose stability is often assumed. The tracing of two constants— expertise and exchange—within networks inhabited by nature and by amateur and professional naturalists allows for an exploration of ways in which social/natural inclusions and exclusions occur in new participatory practices designed as part of biodiversity action planning.
References
1.
AgrawalA, 1999, On power and indigenous knowledge”, in Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity Ed. Addison PoseyD, United Nations Environment Program (Intermediate Technology Publications, London)
2.
AllenD E, 1976The Naturalist in Britain: A Social History (Allen Lane, London)
3.
AllenD E, 1998, “On parallel lines: natural history and biology from the late Victorian period”Archives of Natural History25361–371
4.
AndersonB, 1991Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (Verso, London)
5.
AppaduraiA (Ed.), 1986The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
6.
BowkerGStarS L, 2002Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
7.
BridgeGSmithA, 2003, “Intimate encounters: culture–economy–commodity”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space21257–268
8.
CallonM, 2002, “Writing and (re)writing devices as tools for managing complexity”, in LawJMolA M, Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices (Duke University Press, Durham, NC) pp 191–217
9.
DrouinJ-MBensaude-VincentB, 1996, “Nature for the people”, in Cultures of Natural History Eds JardineNSecordJ ASparyE C (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 408–425
10.
DugdaleA, 1999, “Materiality: juggling sameness and difference”, in Actor Network Theory and After Eds LawJHassardJ (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 113–135
11.
FoucaultM, 1970The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (Tavistock Publications, London)
12.
GoodwinP, 1998, “‘Hired hands' or ‘local voice’: understanding and experience of local participation in conversation”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series23
13.
GregoryC, 1982Gifts and Commodities (Academic Press, London)
14.
GregoryC, 1998Savage Money: The Anthropology and Politics of Commodity Exchange (Harwood Academic, Amsterdam)
15.
HMSO, 1994Biodiversity: The UK Action Plan (HMSO, London)
16.
House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, 2002What on Earth? The Threat to the Science Under-pinning Conservation 3rd report, paper 118(i) (The Stationery Office, London)
17.
JardineNSecordJ ASparyE C (Eds), 1996Cultures of Natural History (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
18.
JasanoffS (Ed.), 2004States of Knowledge (Routledge, London)
19.
KopytoffI, 1986, The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process”, in The Social Life of Things Ed. AppaduraiA (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 64–91
20.
KothariU, 2001, “Power, knowledge and social control in participatory development”, in Participation: The New Tyranny? Eds CookeBKothariU (Zed Books, London) pp 139–152
21.
LatourB, 1987Science in Action (Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA)
22.
LatourB, 1995, “The ‘Pedofil’ of Boavista: a photo-philosophical montage”Common Knowledge4144–187
23.
LatourB, 1999aPandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
24.
LatourB, 1999b, “On recalling ANT”, in Actor Network Theory and After Eds LawJHassardJ (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 15–25
25.
LawJHassardJ (Eds), 1999Actor Network Theory and After (Blackwell, Oxford)
26.
LawJMolA, 2001, “Situating technoscience: an inquiry into spatialities”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19609–621
27.
LiepJ, 2001, “Airborne kula: the appropriation of birds by Danish ornithologists”Anthropology Today17(5) 10–15
28.
LoweP, 1976, “Amateurs and professionals: the institutional emergence of British plant ecology”Journal of the Society for Bibliography of Natural History7517–535
29.
MarcusG, 1995, “Ethnography of in/of the world system: the emergence of multisited ethnography”Annual Review of Anthropologynumber 24, 95–117
30.
MaussM, 1990The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies (Routledge, London); first published in 1950
31.
MerrillL, 1989The Romance of Victorian Natural History (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
32.
MillerD, 1987Material Culture and Mass Consumption (Blackwell, Oxford)
33.
MillerD, 2003, “Could the Internet defetishize the commodity?”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space21359–372
34.
MosseD, 2001, “‘People's knowledge’, participation and patronage: operations and representations in rural development”, in Participation: The New Tyranny? Eds CookeBKothariU (Zed Books, London) pp 16–35
35.
NaylorS, 2001, “Discovering nature, rediscovering the self: natural historians and the landscapes of Argentina”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19227–247
36.
NyhartL, 1996, “Natural History and the ‘new’ biology”, in Cultures of Natural History Eds JardineNSecordJ ASparyE C (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 426–443
37.
OutramD, 1996, “New spaces in natural history”, in Cultures of Natural History Eds JardineNSecordJ ASparyE C (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 249–265
38.
SecordA, 1996, “Artisan botany”, in Cultures of Natural History Eds JardineNSecordJ ASparyE C (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 378–394
39.
StrathernM, 1988The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
40.
StrathernM, 1991Partial Connections (Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD)
41.
StrathernM, 1999, “What is intellectual property after?”, in Actor Network Theory and After Eds LawJHassardJ (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 156–180
42.
TakacsD, 1996The Idea of Biodiversity: Philosophies of Paradise (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
43.
The Guardian2003, “Identity crisis”, 4 September
44.
WatertonCEllisR, 2004, “Environmental citizenship in the making: the participation of volunteer naturalists in the UK biological recording and biodiversity policy”Science and Public Policy31(2) 95–105
45.
WynneB, 1996, “SSK's identity parade: signing-up, off-and-on”Social Studies of Science26357–391
