Within the context of contemporary discussion over geography and developmental ethics, this paper examines part of the genealogy of a modern British sense of responsibility for the plight of distant strangers. The frame of reference for this sense, known as humanitarianism, was first cast overseas through debates over the slave trade in the late 18th century, and its remit was further extended as a result of the contested processes of colonial settlement in the 1820s and 1830s. This geographically expansive discourse is analysed through a study of two exemplary statements of humane intervention: the Aborigines Committee (1835–37), and the military Court of Enquiry into the death of the African Xhosa King Hintsa (1836). Each demonstrated a new-found concern for the fate of colonised individuals. They established that the sufferings of distant others were inextricably connected to the everyday privileges enjoyed by Britons. However, they also formulated prescriptive principles targeted not only at the relief of suffering, but at the moral and material improvement of distant subjects—principles which continue to inform more recent debates over global ethics.
References
1.
BannisterS, 1830Humane Policy; or Justice to the Aborigines of New Settlements (Dawsons, London).
2.
BPP, 1836–37Report From the Select Committee on Aborigines (British Settlement) British Parliamentary Papers; reprinted in 1968 by Irish University Press, Shannon.
3.
BhabhaH, 1985, “Signs taken for wonders: Questions of ambivalence and authority under a tree outside Delhi, May 1817”Critical Inquiry12144–165.
4.
BoyneGPowellM, 1991, “Territorial justice: A review of theory and evidence”Political Geography Quarterly10263–281.
5.
CorbridgeS, 1993, “Marxisms, modernities, and moralities: Development praxis and the claims of distant strangers”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space11449–472.
6.
CorbridgeS, 1998, “Development ethics: Distance, difference, plausibility”Ethics, Place and Environment135–53.
7.
CraisC, 1992White Supremacy and Black Resistance in Pre-industrial South Africa: The Making of the Colonial Order in the Eastern Cape, 1770–1865 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
8.
DriverF, 1988, “Moral geographies: Social science and the urban environment in mid-nineteenth century England”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series13275–287.
9.
ElbourneE, 1991“To Colonize the Mind”: Evangelical Missionaries in Britain and the Eastern Cape, 1790–1837 D Phil dissertation, Department of History, Oxford University, Oxford.
10.
FoucaultM, 1977Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Allen Lane, London).
11.
GandhiL, 1998Postcolonial Theory: A Critical Introduction (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh).
12.
GrimesS, 1999, “Exploring the ethics of development”, in Geography and Ethics: Journeys in a Moral Terrain Eds ProctorJ DSmithD M (Routledge, London) pp 59–71.
13.
HarveyD, 1996Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference (Blackwell, Malden, MA).
14.
HaskellT L, 1985a, “Capitalism and the origins of the humanitarian sensibility, partAmerican Historical Review90339–361.
15.
HaskellT L, 1985b, “Capitalism and the origins of the humanitarian sensibility, part 2”American Historical Review90547–566.
16.
HiltonB, 1988The Age of Atonement: The Influence of Evangelicalism on Social and Economic Thought, 1795–1865 (Clarendon Press, Oxford).
17.
Justus, 1837The Wrongs of the Caffre Nation (James Duncan, London).
18.
KirkT, 1973, “Progress and decline in the Kat River settlement, 1829–1854”Journal of African History14411–428.
19.
LacquerT W, 1989, “Bodies, details, and humanitarian narrative”, in The New Cultural History Ed. HuntL (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) pp 176–204.
20.
LesterA, 1998aColonial Discourse and the Colonisation of Queen Adelaide Province, South Africa Historical Geography Research Series number 34 (Royal Geographical Society/Institute of British Geographers, London).
21.
LesterA, 1998b, “Reformulating identities: British settlers in early nineteenth-century South Africa”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series23515–531.
22.
LesterA, 2001Imperial Networks: Creating Identities in Nineteenth Century South Africa and Britain (Routledge, London).
23.
MellorG R, 1951British Imperial Trusteeship, 1783–1850 (Faber and Faber, London).
24.
MostertN, 1992Frontiers: The Epic of South Africa's Creation and the Tragedy of the Xhosa People (Jonathan Cape, London).
25.
OgbornMPhiloC, 1994, “Soldiers, sailors and moral locations in nineteenth-century Portsmouth”Area26221–231.
26.
ParekhB, 1995, “Liberalism and colonialism: A critique of Locke and Mill”, in The Decolonization of Imagination: Culture, Knowledge and Power Eds PieterseJ NParekhB (Zed Books, London).
27.
PeiresJ B, 1982The House of Phalo: A History of the Xhosa People in the Days of Their Independence (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
28.
PloszajskaT, 1994, “Moral landscapes and manipulated spaces: Gender, class and space in Victorian Reformatory Schools”Journal of Historical Geography20413–429.
29.
PretoriusJ G, 1988The British Humanitarians and the Cape Frontier, 1834–1836 (The Government Printer, Pretoria).
30.
ProctorJ D, 1998, “Ethics in geography: Giving moral form to the geographical imagination”Area308–18.
31.
RossR, 1999Status and Respectability in the Cape Colony, 1750–1870: A Tragedy of Manners (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
32.
SackR D, 1997Homo Geographica: A Framework for Action, Awareness and Moral Concern (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD).
33.
SaidE, 1983The World, the Text and the Critic (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
34.
SaidE, 1993Culture and Imperialism (Chatto and Windus, London).
35.
SayerAStorperM, 1997, “Ethics unbound: For a normative turn in social theory”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space151–17.
36.
SilkJ, 1998, “Caring at a distance”Ethics, Place and Environment1165–182.
37.
SlaterD, 1997“Spatialities of power and postmodern ethics-rethinking geopolitical encounters”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1555–72.
38.
SmithD M, 1997, “Back to the good life: Towards an enlarged conception of social justice”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1519–35.
39.
SmithD M, 1998a, “Geography and moral philosophy: Some common ground”Ethics, Place and Environment17–34.
40.
SmithD M, 1998b, “How far should we care? On the spatial scope of beneficence”Progress in Human Geography2215–38.
41.
SmithD M, 1999a, “Geography and ethics: How far should we go?”Progress in Human Geography23119–125.
42.
SmithD M, 1999b, “Conclusion: Towards a context-sensitive ethics”, in Geography and Ethics: Journeys in a Moral Terrain Eds ProctorJ DSmithD M (Routledge, London) pp 275–289.
43.
SmithD M, 2000a, “The Progress in Human Geography Lecture: Moral progress in human geography: Transcending the place of good fortune”Progress in Human Geography241–18.
44.
SmithD M, 2000bMoral Geographies: Ethics in a World of Difference (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh).
45.
TaussigM, 1992, “Culture of terror-space of death: Roger Casement's Putumayo Report and the explanation of torture”, in Colonialism and Culture Ed. DirksN B (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI) pp 135–174.
46.
TuanY-F, 1993Morality and Imagination: Paradoxes of Progress (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI).
47.
WhatmoreS, 1997, “Dissecting the autonomous self: Hybrid cartographies for a relational ethics”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space1537–53.
