The first three books of the Book of Optics written by Alhazen in Cairo in the eleventh century were translated into English by A I Sabra in 1989. Book I deals with optics, the structure of the eye, image formation in the eye, and with the visual pathways. This book inspired all other books on optics from the thirteenth to the seventeenth century and formed the basis upon which Kepler solved the problem of image formation. However, Alhazen's work contained in Books II and III has been almost totally ignored. These two books contain an account of hundreds of observations and experiments carried out by Alhazen on a broad range of topics which are now studied under the heading of visual perception. He clearly enunciated many of the fundamental principles which are credited to scientists living in the last two hundred years, including a theory of unconscious inference; the law of equal innervation of the eye muscles; the principles of binocular direction; constancy of size, shape, and colour; induced visual motion; the vertical horopter; the fusional range of binocular disparity; and many others.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlhazenI, 1983Book of Optics, in The Optics of Ibn al-Haythamtwo volumes; translation by SabraA I, (1989; London: Warburg Institute)
2.
AguiloniusF, 1613Opticorum Libri Sex (Antwerp: Plantin)
3.
BauerH, 1912“Die Psychologie Alhazens”Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters51–72
4.
BoringE G, 1942Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts)
5.
BurtonH E, 1945“The Optics of Euclid”Journal of the Optical Society of America35357–372
6.
CrombieA C, 1967“The mechanistic hypothesis and the scientific study of vision: Some optical ideas as a background to the invention of the microscope”, in Historical Aspects of Microscopy Eds BradburySTurnerG L'E, (Cambridge: Heffer) pp 3–113
FantzR, 1965“Visual perception from birth as shown by pattern selectivity”Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences118793–814
9.
GalenC, 175 ad De Usa Partium Corporis Humani translated by MayM T, (1968; Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press)
10.
GarnerW R, 1974The Processing of Information and Structure (New York: John Wiley)
11.
GilchristA L, 1980“When does perceived lightness depend on perceived spatial arrangement?”Perception & Psychophysics28527–538
12.
GregoryR L, 1991“Putting illusions in their place”Perception201–4
13.
HammondJ H, 1981The Camera Obscura: A Chronicle (Bristol: Hillger)
14.
HellerD, 1988“History of eye movements”, in Eye Movement Research Eds LüerGLassUShallo-HoffmannJ, (Toronto: Hogrefe) pp 37–54
15.
von HelmholtzH, 1910Handbook of Physiological Optics translation by SouthallJ P C, (1962; New York: Dover) of Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik3rd edition (1910; Hamburg: Voss)
16.
HeringE, 1879Spatial Sense and Movements of the Eye translation by RaddeC A, (1942; Baltimore, MD: American Academy of Optometry)
17.
von HolstEMittelstaedtH, 1950“Das Reafferenzprinzip”Naturwissenschaften37464–476
18.
HolwayA HBoringE G, 1941“Determinants of apparent visual size with distance variant”American Journal of Psychology5421–37
19.
HowardI P, 1982Human Visual Orientation (Chichester: John Wiley)
20.
HowardI PRogersB, 1995Binocular Vision and Stereopsis (New York: Oxford University Press)
21.
HowardI PWadeN J, 1996“Ptolemy's contributions to the geometry of binocular vision”Perception251189–1201
22.
HuffmanD, 1971“Impossible objects as nonsense sentences”, in Machine Intelligence 6 Eds MeltzerBMichieD, (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press) pp 295–324
23.
KanizsaG, 1979Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception (New York: Praeger)
24.
KatzD, 1911“Die Erscheinungsweisen der Farben”Zeitschrift für Psychologie779–245
25.
KoffkaK, 1935Principles of Gestalt Psychology (New York: Harcourt Brace)
26.
LindbergD C, 1976Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press)
27.
MeyeringT C, 1989Historical Roots of Cognitive Science (Dordrecht: Kluwer)
28.
NeedhamJ, 1962Science and Civilization in ChinaVolume 4, Part 1 (London: Cambridge University Press)
29.
OnoH, 1980“Hering's law of equal innervation and vergence eye movement”American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics57578–585
30.
OnoH, 1981“On Wells' 1792 law of visual direction”Perception & Psychophysics30403–406
31.
PanumP L, 1858Physiologische Untersuchungen über das Sehen mit zwei Augen (Kiel: Schwers)
32.
ParksT E, 1965“Postretinal visual storage”American Journal of Psychology78145–147
33.
PlugCRossH E, 1994“The natural moon illusion: A multifactor angular account”Perception23321–333
34.
PolyakS, 1957The Vertebrate Visual System (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press) pp 109–110
35.
PrevostP, 1804Essais de Philosophie ou Étude de l'Esprit Humain (Geneva: Paschoud)
36.
PriestleyJ, 1772The History and Present State of Discoveries Relating to Vision, Light, and Colours (London: Johnson)
37.
RonanC A, 1978The Shorter Science and Civilization in China. An abridgement of Joseph Needham's original text Science and Civilisation in China (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) volume 2, pp 351–352
38.
RonchiV, 1970The Nature of Light. An Historical Survey (London: William Heinemann)
39.
RussellG A, 1979“Ibn al-Haytham—the first biophysicist”Trends in Neurosciences2VIII–XI
40.
RossH ERossG M, 1976“Did Ptolemy understand the moon illusion?”Perception5377–385
41.
SabraA I, 1966“Ibn al-Haytham's criticisms of Ptolemy's Optics”Journal of the History of Philosophy4145–149
42.
SabraA I, 1978“Sensation and inference in Alhazen's theory of visual perception”, in Studies in Perception Eds MachamerP KTurnbullR G, (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press) pp 160–184
43.
SabraA I, 1987a“Islamic optics”, in Dictionary of the Middle Agesvolume 9, Ed. StrayerJ R, (New York: Scribner) pp 240–247
44.
SabraA I, 1987b“Psychology versus mathematics: Ptolemy and Alhazen on the moon illusion”, in Mathematics and Its Applications to Science and Natural Philosophy in the Middle Ages Eds GrantEMurdochJ E, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 217–247
45.
SabraA I, 1989“Form in ibn al-Haytham's theory of vision”Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Arabisch-Islamischen Wissenschaften5115–140
46.
ten DoesschateG, 1962“Oxford and the revival of optics in the thirteenth century”Vision Research1313–342
47.
ViethG A U, 1818, “Über die Richtung der Augen”Annalen der Physik28233–253
48.
WadeN J, 1987“On the late invention of the stereoscope”Perception16785–818
49.
WangQCavanaghPGreenM, 1994“Familiarity and pop-out in visual search”Perception & Psychophysics56495–500
50.
WellsW C, 1792An Essay upon Single Vision with Two Eyes: Together with Experiments and Observations on Several Other Subjects in Optics (London: Cadell)
51.
WernerO, 1910Zur Physik Leonardo da Vinci (Magdeburg)
52.
WheatstoneC, 1838“Contributions to the physiology of vision. Part the first. On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London128371–394
