It is now well known that processing of shading information in face recognition is susceptible to bottom lighting and contrast reversal, an effect that may be due to a disruption of 3-D shape processing. The question then is whether the disruption can be rectified by other sources of 3-D information, such as shape-from-stereo. We examined this issue by comparing identification performance either with or without stereo information using top-lit and bottom-lit face stimuli in both photographic positive and negative conditions. The results show that none of the shading effects was reduced by the presence of stereo information. This finding supports the notion that shape-from-shading overrides shape-from-stereo in face perception. Although shape-from-stereo did produce some signs of facilitation for face identification, this effect was negligible. Together, our results support the view that 3-D shape processing plays only a minor role in face recognition. Our data are best accounted for by a weighted function of 2-D processing of shading pattern and 3-D processing of shapes, with a much greater weight assigned to 2-D pattern processing.
References
1.
BassiliJ N, 1978“Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expression”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance4373–379
2.
BerryD S, 1990“What can a moving face tell us?”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology581004–1014
3.
BerryD S, 1991“Child and adult sensitivity to gender information in patterns of facial motion”Ecological Psychology3349–366
4.
BeymerDPoggioT, 1996“Image representations for visual learning”Science2721905–1909
5.
BrajeW LKerstenDTarrM JTrojeN F, 1998“Illumination effects in face recognition”Psychobiology26371–380
6.
BruceVBurtonA MHannaEHealeyPMasonOCoombesAFrightRLinneyA, 1993“Sex discrimination: How do we tell the difference between male and female faces?”Perception22131–152
BruceVLangtonS, 1994“The use of pigmentation and shading information in recognising the sex and identities of faces”Perception23803–822
9.
BülthoffH H, 1991“Shape from X: Psychophysics and computation”, in Computational Models of Visual Processing Eds LandyM SMovshonJ A, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 305–330
10.
BülthoffH HEdelmanS, 1992“Psychophysical support for a 2-D view interpolation theory of object recognition”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA8960–64
11.
BülthoffH HEdelmanSTarrM J, 1995“How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain?”Cerebral Cortex5247–260
12.
BülthoffH HMallotH A, 1988“Integration of depth modules: Stereo and shading”Journal of the Optical Society of America A51749–1758
13.
ChristieFBruceV, 1998“The role of dynamic information in the recognition of unfamiliar faces”Memory & Cognition26780–790
14.
DaviesGEllisHShepherdJ, 1978“Face recognition accuracy as a function of mode of representation”Journal of Applied Psychology63180–187
15.
EdelmanSBülthoffH H, 1992“Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects”Vision Research322385–2400
16.
EnnsJ TShoreD I, 1997“Separate influences of orientation and lighting in the inverted-face”Perception & Psychophysics5923–31
17.
ErensR GKappersA MKoenderinkJ J, 1993“Perception of local shape from shading”Perception & Psychophysics54145–156
18.
GalperR E, 1970“Recognition of faces in photographic negative”Psychonomic Science19207–208
19.
GalperR EHochbergJ, 1971“Recognition memory for photographs of faces”American Journal of Psychology84351–354
20.
GauthierITarrM J, 1997“Becoming a ‘Greeble’ expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition”Vision Research371673–1682
21.
HancockP J BBruceVBurtonM A, 1998“A comparison of two computer-based face identification systems with human perceptions of faces”Vision Research382277–2288
22.
HayesA, 1988“Identification of two-tone images: Some implications for high- and low-spatial-frequency processes in human vision”Perception17429–436
23.
HillHBruceV, 1993“Independent effects of lighting, orientation, and stereopsis on the hollow-face illusion”Perception22887–897
24.
HillHBruceV, 1994“A comparison between the hollow-face and ‘hollow-potato’ illusions”Perception231335–1337
25.
HillHBruceV, 1996“The effects of lighting on the perception of facial surfaces”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22986–1004
26.
HillHSchynsP GAkamatsuS, 1997“Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition”Cognition62201–222
27.
JohnstonAHillHCarmanN, 1992“Recognising faces: Effects of lighting direction, inversion, and brightness reversal”Perception21365–375
28.
JohnstonAPassmoreP J, 1994a“Shape from shading I: Surface curvature and orientation”Perception23169–189
29.
JohnstonAPassmoreP J, 1994b“Shape from shading II: Geodesic bisection and alignment”Perception23191–200
30.
KempRPikeGWhitePMusselmanA, 1996“Perception and recognition of normal and negative faces: The role of shape from shading and pigmentation cues”Perception2537–52
31.
KnightBJohnstonR A, 1997“The role of movement in face recognition”Visual Cognition4265–273
32.
LanderKChristieFBruceV, 1999“The role of movement in the recognition of famous faces”Memory & Cognition27974–985
33.
LederH, 1996“Line drawings of faces reduce configural processing”Perception25355–366
34.
LiuC HChaudhuriA, 1997“Face recognition with multi-tone and two-tone photographic negatives”Perception261289–1296
35.
LiuC HChaudhuriA, 1998“Are there qualitative differences in face recognition between positive and negative?”Perception271107–1122
36.
LiuC HCollinC ABurtonA MChaudhuriA, 1999“Lighting direction affects recognition of untextured faces in photographic positive and negative”Vision Research394003–4009
37.
LiuC HCollinC ARainvilleS J MChaudhuriA, in press “The effects of spatial frequency overlap on face recognition”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
38.
MamassianPKerstenD, 1996“Illumination, shading and the perception of local orientation”Vision Research362351–2367
39.
NásásnenR, 1999“Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images”Vision Research393824–3833
40.
NelsonC AHorowitzF D, 1983“The perception of facial expressions and stimulus motion by two- and five-month-old infants using holographic stimuli”Child Development54868–877
41.
ParkerA JCummingB GJohnstonE BHurlbertA C, 1995“Multiple cues for three-dimensional shape”, in The Cognitive Neurosciences Ed. GazzanigaM S, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 351–364
42.
PhillipsR J, 1972“Why are faces hard to recognise in photographic negative?”Perception & Psychophysics12425–426
43.
PikeG EKempR ITowellN APhillipsK C, 1997“Recognizing moving faces: The relative contribution of motion and perspective view information”Visual Cognition4409–437
44.
RamachandranV S, 1988“Perception of shape from shading”Nature (London)331163–166
45.
RamachandranV SArmelCFosterCStoddardR, 1998“Object recognition can drive motion perception”Nature (London)395852–853
46.
SokenN HPickA D, 1992“Intermodal perception of happy and angry expressive behaviors by seven-month-old infants”Child Development63787–795
47.
StuckiMKaufmann-HayozRKaufmannF, 1987“Infants' recognition of a face revealed through motion: Contribution of internal facial movement and head movement”Journal of Experimental Child Psychology4480–91
SunJPeronaP, 1997“Shading and stereo in early perception of shape and reflectance”Perception26519–529
50.
TarrM JKerstenDBülthoffH H, 1998“Why the visual recognition system might encode the effects of illumination”Vision Research382259–2275
51.
TrojeN FBülthoffH H, 1996“Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape”Vision Research361761–1771
52.
TrojeN FBülthoffH H, 1998“How is bilateral symmetry of human faces used for recognition of novel views?”Vision Research3879–89
53.
TrojeN FSymonsL A, 1998“Search asymmetries for shaded disks are not present for shaded faces”Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science39(4) S166
54.
UttalW RLiuNKalkiJ, 1996“An integrated computational model of three-dimensional vision”Spatial Vision9393–422
55.
ValentinDAbdiHEdelmanB, 1997“What represents a face? A computational approach for the integration of physiological and psychological data”Perception261271–1288
56.
Van den EndenASpekreijseH, 1989“Binocular depth reversals despite familiarity cues”Science244959–961
57.
WiskottLFellousJ-MKrugerNvon der MalsburgC, 1997“Face recognition by elastic bunch graph matching”Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Santa Barbara, CAvolume 1, pp 129–132
