Johansson's point-light walker figures remain one of the most powerful and convincing examples of the role that motion can play in the perception of form (Johansson, 1973 Perception & Psychophysics14 201–211; 1975 Scientific American232(6) 76–88). In the current work, we use a dual-task paradigm to explore the role of attention in the processing of such stimuli. In two experiments we find striking differences in the degree to which direction-discrimination performance in point-light walker displays appears to rely on attention. Specifically, we find that performance in displays thought to involve top – down processing, either in time (experiment 1) or space (experiment 2) is adversely affected by dividing attention. In contrast, dividing attention has little effect on performance in displays that allow low-level, bottom – up computations to be carried out. We interpret these results using the active/passive motion distinction introduced by Cavanagh (1991 Spatial Vision5 303–309).
References
1.
BakerCBraddickO, 1985“Temporal properties of the short-range process in apparent motion”Perception14181–192
2.
BertenthalB IPintoJ, 1994“Global processing of biological motions”Psychological Science5221–225
3.
BertenthalB IProffittD RSpetnerN BThomasM A, 1985“The development of infants sensitivity to biomechanical displays”Child Development56531–543
CavanaghP, 1999“Attention: Exporting vision to the mind”, in Neuronal Basis and Psychological Aspects of Consciousness Eds Taddei-FerrettiCMusioC (Singapore: World Scientific) pp 129–143
9.
CavanaghPLabiancaAThorntonI M, 2001“Attention-based visual routines: Sprites”Cognition8047–60
10.
CavanaghPMatherG, 1989“Motion: The long and the short of it”Spatial Vision4103–129
11.
CuttingJ E, 1978“A program to generate synthetic walkers as dynamic point-light displays”Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation1091–94
12.
CuttingJ EMooreCMorrisonR, 1988“Masking the motions of human gait”Perception & Psychophysics44339–347
13.
DittrichW H, 1993“Action categories and the perception of biological motion”Perception2215–22
14.
FoxRMcDanielC, 1982“The perception of biological motion by human infants”Science218486–487
15.
von HelmholtzH, 1910/1962Treatise on Physiological Opticsvolume 3 (1962, New York: Dover); English translation by SouthallJ P C for the Optical Society of America (1925) from the 3rd German edition of Handbuch der physiologischen Optik Eds GullstrandAvon KriesJNagelW (1910, Hamburg: Voss)
16.
Heptulla ChatterjeeSFreydJShiffrarM, 1996“Configural processing in the perception of apparent biological motion”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22916–929
17.
HoffmanD DFlinchbaughB E, 1982“The interpretation of biological motion”Biological Cybernetics42195–204
18.
InmanV TRalstonHToddF, 1981Human Walking (Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins)
19.
JohanssonG, 1973“Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis”Perception & Psychophysics14201–211
JohanssonG, 1976“Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception”Psychological Review38379–393
22.
JosephJ SChunM MNakayamaK, 1997“Attentional requirements in a ‘preattentive’ feature search task”Nature387805–807
23.
KorteA, 1915“Kinematoskopische Untersuchungen”Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane (1. Abteilung Zeitschrift für Psychologie) 72193–296
McBeathM KShepardR N, 1989“Apparent motion between shapes differing in location and orientation: A window technique for estimating path curvature”Perception & Psychophysics46333–337
26.
McLeodPDittrichWDriverJPerrettDZihlJ, 1996“Preserved and impaired detection of structure from motion by a ‘motion blind’ patient”Visual Cognition3363–391
27.
MareyE J, 1895/1972Movement (1972, New York: Arno Press and New York Times) (original work published in 1895)
28.
MatherGRadfordKWestS, 1992“Low level visual processing of biological motion”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B249149–155
29.
O'CravenK MRosenB RKwongK KTreismanASavoyR L, 1997“Voluntary attention modulates fMRI activity in human MT-MST”Neuron18591–598
30.
OramMPerrettD, 1994“Responses of anterior superior temporal polysensory (STPa) neurons to ‘biological motion’ stimuli”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience699–116
31.
PantleA JPetersikJ T, 1980“Effects of spatial parameters on the perceptual organization of a bistable motion display”Perception & Psychophysics27307–312
32.
PerrettDHarriesMMistlinA JChittyA J, 1990“Three stages in the classification of body movements by visual neurons”, in Images and Understanding Eds BarlowH BBlakemoreCWeston-SmithM (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 94–107
33.
PetersikJ T, 1989“The two-process distinction in apparent motion”Psychological Bulletin106107–127
34.
PetersikJ T, 1991“Comments on Cavanagh and Mather (1989): Coming up short (and long)”Spatial Vision5291–301
35.
ProffittD RBertenthalB IRobertsJ R J, 1984“The role of occlusion in reducing multistability in moving point-light displays”Perception & Psychophysics43465–474
36.
RaymondJ EO'DonnellH LTipperS P, 1998“Priming reveals attentional modulation of human motion sensitivity”Vision Research382863–2867
37.
ReesGFrithCLavieN, 1997“Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task”Science2781616–1619
38.
RegolinLTommasiLVallortigaraG, 1999“Discrimination of point-light animation sequences by newborn chicks”Perception28Supplement, 23
39.
RensinkR A, 2000a“The dynamic representation of scenes”Visual Cognition717–42
40.
RensinkR A, 2000b“Visual search for change: A probe into the nature of attentional processing”Visual Cognition7345–376
41.
RensinkR A, 2000c“Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing”Vision Research401469–1487
42.
ShiffrarM, 1994“When what meets where”Current Directions in Psychological Science396–100
43.
ShiffrarMFreydJ J, 1990“Apparent motion of the human body”Psychological Science1257–264
44.
ShiffrarMFreydJ J, 1993“Timing and apparent motion path choice with human body photographs”Psychological Science4379–384
45.
ShiffrarMLichteyLHeptulla ChatterjeeS, 1997“The perception of biological motion across apertures”Perception & Psychophysics5951–59
46.
SimonsD JLevinD T, 1997“Change blindness”Trends in Cognitive Sciences1(7) 261–267
47.
ThorntonI MPintoJShiffrarM, 1998“The visual perception of human locomotion”Cognitive Neuropsychology15535–552
48.
UllmanS, 1984“Visual routines”Cognition1897–159
49.
VainaLLemayMBienfangDChoiANakayamaK, 1990“Intact ‘biological motion’ and ‘structure from motion’ perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: A case study”Visual Neuroscience5353–369
50.
WallachH, 1935“Über visuell wahrgenommene Bewegungsrichtung”Psychologische Forschung20325–380 [English translation with commentary by WuergerSShapleyRRubinN, 1996“On the visually perceived direction of motion”Perception251317–1367]
51.
WebbJ AAggarwalJ K, 1982“Structure from motion of rigid and jointed objects”Artificial Intelligence19107–130
52.
WertheimerM, 1912“Experimentelle Studien uber das Sehen von Bewegung”Zeitschrift für Psychologie61161–265 [Commentary by SekulerS, 1996“Motion perception: A modern view of Wertheimer's 1912 monograph”Perception251243–1258]
53.
YamaguchiM KFujitaK, 1999“Perception of biological motion by newly hatched chicks and quail”Perception28Supplement, 23–24
