One distinctive feature of processing faces, as compared to other categories, is thought to be the large dependence on configural cues such as the metric relations among features. To test the role of low spatial frequencies (LSFs) and high spatial frequencies (HSFs) in configural and featural processing, subjects were presented with triplets of faces that were filtered to preserve either LSFs (below 8 cycles per face width), HSFs (above 32 cycles per face width), or the full frequency spectrum. They were asked to match one of two probe faces to a target face. The distractor probe face differed from the target either configurally, featurally, or both featurally and configurally. When the difference was at the configural level, performance was better with LSF faces than with HSF faces. In contrast, with a featural difference, a strong performance advantage was found for HSF faces as compared to LSF faces. These results support the dominant role that LSFs play in the configural processing of faces, whereas featural processing is largely dependent on HSFs.
References
1.
AkhtarNEnnsJ T, 1989“Relations between covert orienting and filtering in the development of visual attention”Journal of Experimental Psychology48315–334.
2.
BartlettJ CSearcyJ, 1993“Inversion and configuration of faces”Cognitive Psychology25281–316.
3.
BartonJ JKeenanJ PBassT, 2001“Discrimination of spatial relations and features in faces: Effects of inversion and viewing duration”British Journal of Psychology92527–549.
4.
BoutetICollinCFaubertJ, 2003“Configural face encoding and spatial frequency information”Perception & Psychophysics651078–1093.
5.
BullierJ, 2001“Integrated model of visual processing”Brain Research. Brain Research Reviews3696–107.
6.
ChristieJKleinR, 1995“Familiarity and attention: Does what we know affect what we notice?”Memory & Cognition23547–550.
7.
CollishawS MHoleG J, 2000“Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity”Perception29893–909.
8.
CostenN PParkerD MCrawI, 1994“Spatial content and spatial quantisation effects in face recognition”Perception23129–146.
9.
CostenN PParkerD MCrawI, 1996“Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification”Perception & Psychophysics58602–612.
10.
De ValoisR LDe ValoisK K, 1988Spatial Vision (New York: Oxford University Press).
11.
DiamondRCareyS, 1986“Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General115107–117.
12.
FiorentiniAMaffeiLSandiniG, 1983“The role of high spatial frequencies in face perception”Perception12195–201.
13.
FreireALeeKSymonsL A, 2000“The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence”Perception29159–170.
14.
GauthierITarrM J, 1997“Becoming a ‘Greeble’ expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition”Vision Research371673–1682.
15.
GoffauxVGauthierIRossionB, 2003a“Spatial scale contribution to early visual differences between face and object processing”Cognitive Brain Research16416–424.
16.
GoffauxVJemelBJacquesCRossionBSchynsP G, 2003b“ERP evidence for task modulations on face perceptual processing at different spatial scales”Cognitive Science27313–325.
17.
GoldJBennettP JSekulerA B, 1999“Identification of band-pass filtered letters and faces by human and ideal observers”Vision Research393537–3560.
18.
HaigN D, 1984“The effect of feature displacement on face recognition”Perception13505–512.
19.
HochsteinSAhissarM, 2002“View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system”Neuron36791–804.
20.
HosieJ AEllisH DHaigN D, 1988“The effect of feature displacement on the perception of well-known faces”Perception17461–474.
21.
KempRMcManusCPiggotT, 1990“Sensitivity to the displacement of facial features in negative and inverted images”Perception19531–543.
22.
KennettSEimerMSpenceCDriverJ, 2001“Tactile – visual links in exogenous spatial attention under different postures: Convergent evidence from psychophysics and ERPs”Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience13462–478.
23.
LederH, 1996“Line drawings of faces reduce configural processing”Perception25355–366.
24.
LederHBruceV, 1998“Local and relational aspects of face distinctiveness”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology51449–473.
25.
LederHBruceV, 2000“When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A53513–536.
26.
LederHCandrianGHuberOBruceV, 2001“Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces”Perception3073–83.
27.
Le GrandRMondlochC JMaurerDBrentH P, 2001“Neuroperception. Early visual experience and face processing”Nature410890.
28.
MaurerDLe GrandRMondlochC J, 2002“The many faces of configural processing”Trends in Cognitive Sciences6255–260.
29.
MorrisonD JSchynsP G, 2001“Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects, and scenes”Psychonomic Bulletin & Review8454–469.
30.
NäsänenR, 1999“Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images”Vision Research393824–3833.
31.
ParkerD MCostenN P, 1999“One extreme or the other or perhaps the golden mean? Issues of spatial resolution in face processing”Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality18118–127.
32.
PellicanoERhodesG, 2003“Holistic processing of faces in preschool children and adults”Psychological Science14618–622.
33.
RhodesGBrakeSAtkinsonA P, 1993“What's lost in inverted faces?”Cognition4725–57.
34.
RossionBGauthierI, 2002“How does the brain process upright and inverted faces?”Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews163–75.
35.
SchynsP GOlivaA, 1999“Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: When categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations”Cognition69243–265.
36.
SearcyJ HBartlettJ C, 1996“Inversion and processing of component and spatial – relational information in faces”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22904–915.
37.
SergentJ, 1984“An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception”British Journal of Psychology75221–242.
38.
SergentJ, 1986“Microgenesis of face perception”, in Aspects of Face Processing Eds EllisH DJeevesM ANewcombeFYoungA M, (Dordrecht: Kluwer) pp 17–33.
39.
TanakaJ WFarahM J, 1993“Parts and wholes in face recognition”Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A46225–245.
40.
TanakaJ WGauthierI, 1997“Expertise in object and face recognition”, in Psychology of Learning and Motivation Eds GoldstoneR LSchynsP GMedinD L, (San Diego, CA: Academic Press) pp 83–125.
41.
TanakaJ WSengcoJ A, 1997“Features and their configuration in face recognition”Memory & Cognition25583–592.
42.
TownsendJ TAshbyF G, 1983The Stochastic Modelling of Elementary Psychological Processes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
43.
ValentineT, 1988“Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition”British Journal of Psychology79471–491.
44.
WebsterM AKapingDMizokamiYDuhamelP, 2004“Adaptation to natural facial categories”Nature428557–561.
45.
WengerM JTownsendJ T, 2000“Spatial frequencies in short-term memory for faces: A test of three frequency-dependent hypotheses”Memory & Cognition28125–142.
46.
YinR K, 1969“Looking at upside-down faces”Journal of Experimental Psychology81141–145.
