For several polynuclear urban areas (Randstad, Ruhr, Flemish Diamond), (loose) visions, images and planning discourses have been conceived. Nevertheless, one has to conclude that no or very few of these visions, images, discourses have led to actions. This paper explores some lines of thought to bridge the gap between idea and action in polynucleated urban areas. The focus is on the type of planning needed, the kind of issues that could be tackled and the institutions needed to initiate the necessary co-operation between stakeholders—public and private—playing a role in polynucleated urban areas. The Flemish Diamond is treated as a deliberate attempt to use a new type of strategic planning to tackle this polynucleated urban area in an integrated way. The approach is influenced by more general principles derived from planning literature, the authors' own professional experience and the specificity of one particular case: the Flemish Diamond. The paper focuses on the design of arenas (forums) in polynucleated urban areas, the selection of strategic issues and the support of the planning process.
References
1.
Albrechts, L. (1992) Changing aspects of Belgian public planning, in: A. DuTT and F. CosTA (Eds) Perspectives in Planning and Urban Development in Belgium, pp. 27-42. Dordrecht: Kluwer , Academic Publisher.
2.
Albrechts, L. (1995) Batir le visage d'une region, Dokumente und Informationen zur Schweizerischen Orts-, Regional- und Landesplanung, 122(July), pp. 29-34.
3.
Albrechts, L. (1998) The FlemishDiamond: precious gem and virgin area, European Planning Studies, 6, pp. 411-424.
4.
Albrechts, L. (1999a) Planners as catalysts and initiators of change: the new Structure Plan for Flanders, European Planning Studies , 7, pp.587-608.
5.
Albrechts, L. (1999b) Planners and change: how do Flemish planners on the shop floor cope with change?, Sociedade e Territoria, 29(July), pp. 36-46.
6.
Albrechts, L. (1999c) Revival of strategic planning: a western European perspective. Paper presented at the Fifth APSA Congress, Seoul, September.
7.
Balducci, A. and Fareri, P. (1996) Consensus building as a strategy to cope with planning problems at different territorial levels: examples from the Italian case-study . Paper presented at the ACSP/AESOP Congress, Toronto, July.
8.
Baum, H.S. (1997) The Organisation of Hope: Communities Planning Themselves. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
9.
Bryson, J.M. (1995) Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organization. San Francisso, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Bryson, J.M. and Crosby, B.C. (1989) The design and use of strategic planning arenas, PlanningOutlook, 32(1), pp. 5-13.
11.
Bryson, J.M. and Crosby, B.C. (1992) Leadership for the Common Good: Tackling Public Problems in a Shared Power World. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Bryson, J.M. and Roering, W.D. (1988) Initiation of strategic planning by governments , Public Administration Review, 48, pp. 995-1004.
13.
Eadie, D.C. (1983) Putting a powerful tool to practical use: the application of strategic planning in the public sector, Public Administration Review, 43, pp. 447-452.
14.
European Commission (1991) Europe 2000: Outlook for the Development of the Community Territory. Brussels: European Commission.
15.
Faludi, A. (1999) De architectuur van de Europese ruimtelijke ontwikkelingspolitiek. Inaugurale rede, Nijmegen, K.U., Nijmegen.
16.
Flyvbjerg, B. (1998) Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
17.
Gomez, M. and Etxebarria, G. (1993) Networks and spatial dynamics: the case of the Basque country, European Planning Studies, 1, pp.299-318.
18.
Granados-Cabezas, V. (1995) Another methodology for local development? Selling places with packaging techniques: view from the Spanish experience on city strategic planning, European Planning Studies, 3, pp. 173-187.
19.
Haas, P. (1992) Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination, International Organization, 46, pp. 1-35.
20.
Hajer, M. (1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse. A Study of the Acid Rain Controversy in Great Britain and the Netherlands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
Healey, P. (1997a) Collaborative Planning. Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London: Macmillan Press.
22.
Healey, P. (1997b) An institutionalist approach to spatial planning , in: P. Healey, A. Khakee, A. Motte and B. Needham (Eds) Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe, pp. 21-36. London: University College London Press.
23.
Healey, P., Khakee, A., Motte, A. and Needham, B. (1997) Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe . London: University College London Press.
24.
Holt-Jensen, A. (1997) Strategic development planning in western Norway , in: P. Healey, A. Khakee, A. Motte and B. Needham (Eds) Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe, pp. 135-152. London: University College London Press.
25.
Innes, J. (1995) Planning theory's emerging paradigm: communicative action and interactive practice, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(3), pp. 183-190.
26.
Innes, J. (1996) Planning through consensus-building: a new view of the comprehensive planning ideal, Journal of the American Planning Association, 62, pp. 460-472.
27.
Innes, J. and Booher, D.E. (1998) Network power and collaborative planning: strategy for the informational age. Paper presented at the ACSP Congress, Passadena, November.
28.
Kamp, E. (1998) Empathy and planning. Paper presented at the ACSP Congress, Passadena, November.
29.
Kaufman, J.L. and Jacobs, H.M. (1996) A public planning perspective on strategic planning , in: S. Campbell and S. Fainstein (Eds.) Readings in Planning Theory , pp. 323-343. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
30.
Kunzmann, K. (1996) Das Ruhrgebiet: alte Lasten und neue Chancen, in: Akademie Für Raumforschung Und Landesplanung (Ed.) Aggglomerationsräume in Deutschland: Ansichten, Einsichten, Aussichten. Forschungsund Sitzungsberichte , Band 199, ARL, pp. 112-153. Hannover.
31.
Kunzmann, K. (1999) Strategic spatial development through information and communication. Paper presented at the Colloquium 'Revival of Spatial Planning' , Amsterdam, February.
32.
Mandelbaum, S. (1985) The institutional focus of planning theory, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 5, pp. 3-9.
33.
Martin, D. and Ten Velden, H. (1998) Extra options as optional extras: what ideas are behind the ESDP?, Built Environment, 23, pp.267-280.
34.
Mastop, H. (1998) Re-institutionalising strategic spatial planning: some north-west European experiences. Paper presented at the AESOP Congress, Aveiro, July.
35.
Poister, T.H. and Streib, G. (1999) Strategic management in the public sector: concepts, models and processes, Public Management and Productivity Review , 18, pp. 115-125.
36.
Sandercock, L. (1998) Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
37.
Storper, M. (1997) The Regional World. New York : The Guilford Press.
