The North American Control Animal Database: A Resource Based on Standardized Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria

Abstract

Historical control data have been shown to be valuable in the interpretation and evaluation of results from rodent carcinogenicity studies. Standardization of terminology and histopathology procedures is a prerequisite for meaningful comparison of control data across studies and analysis of potential carcinogenic effects. Standardization is particularly critical for the construction of a database that includes incidence data from different studies evaluated by pathologists in different laboratories. Standardized nomenclature and diagnostic criteria have been established for neoplasms and proliferative lesions. Efforts of the National Toxicology Program, the Society of Toxicologic Pathology (STP), and the Registry of Industrial Toxicology Animal-data (RITA) have led to a harmonized pathology nomenclature for the rat and the mouse. This nomenclature with detailed descriptions of lesions is available in publications by the STP and International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). A listing of these terms is available on the World Wide Web. Utilizing the model established by RITA and working with the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI), companies with laboratories in North America formed a working group in 1994 to establish and maintain a database of neoplastic and proliferative lesions from control animals in carcinogenicity studies. The rationale for development of the North American Control Animal Database (NACAD), the factors that influence tumor incidence, operation of the database, and the benefits to be realized by using a standardized approach are discussed.

Keywords

Rat mouse histopathology pathology historical control data NACAD RITA ILSI neoplasia neoplastic lesion.

References

Bahnemann R. , Jacobs M. , Karbe E. , Kaufmann W. , Morawietz G. , Nolte T. , Rittinghausen S. (1995). RITA-Registry of industrial toxicology animaldata—Guides for organ sampling and trimming procedures in rats. Exp Toxic Pathol 47: 247—266.

Eustis SL , Hailey JR , Boorman GA , Haseman JK (1994). The utility of multiple-section sampling in the histopathological evaluation of the kidney for carcinogenicity studies. Toxicol Pathol 22: 457—472.

Halliwell WH (1998). Submucosal mesenchymal tumors of the mouse urinary bladder. Toxicol Pathol 26: 128—136.

Haseman JK (1989). Sources of variability inrodentcarcinogenicity studies. Fundam Appl Toxicol 12: 793—804.

Keenan KP , Ballam GC , Soper KA , Laroque P. , Coleman JB , Dixit R. (1999). Diet, caloric restriction, and the rodent bioassay . Toxicol Sci 52 (Supplement): 24—34.

McAuslane Jan (1991). The need for a control animal pathology database: An international survey. Hum Exp Toxicol 10: 205—213.

Morawietz G. , Rittinghausen S. , Mohr U. (1992). RITA-Registry of industrial toxicology animal-data—Progress of the working group. Exp Toxic Pathol 44: 301—309.

National Toxicology Program (NTP) (1997). Effect on Dietary Restriction on Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice. Technical Report Series No. 460. NIH Publication No. 97-3376. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

Sheldon W. , Bucci T. , Hart R. , Turturro A. (1995). Age-related neoplasia in a lifetime study of ad libitum-fed and food restricted B6C3F1 mice. Toxicol Path 23: 458—476.

10.

van Zwieten MJ , Majka JA , Peter CP , Burek JD (1988): The value of historical control data. In: ILSI Monographs: Carcinogenicity—The design, analysis and interpretation of long-term animal studies, Grice HC , Ciminera JL (eds). Springer-Verlag, Berlin , pp 39—51.