Cluster policy in the UK, pursued by the Regional Development Agencies (RDAs), has readily adopted a simplistic definition based upon industrial sectors and location quotients. Evidence drawn from a study of the operating behaviour of SMEs belonging to two traditional manufacturing industries within the West Midlands—automotive components and clothing—provides a critique of this approach. Whilst the automotive components industry has been designated part of a key, high priority cluster, the clothing industry has not. Using case studies from both industries, this paper shows firms both within and outside RDA cluster definitions display a remarkably similar range of behavioural characteristics. Yet, based on weakly defined cluster policy, one industry enjoys considerably more policy support than the other. The paper begins to question the logic of RDA cluster policy and to ask whether a more sophisticated and locally sympathetic manner of visualising clusters and business behaviour rather than an emphasis on employment numbers would have a greater impact for policy.
Advantage West Midlands (1999) Creating Advantage: the West Midlands Economic Strategy. (Birmingham: Advantage West Midlands).
2.
Advantage West Midlands (2001a) Agenda for Action: a Regional Partnership to Deliver the West Midlands Economic Strategy. (Birmingham: Advantage West Midlands).
3.
Advantage West Midlands (2001b) Midwest Clothing 2000 (Birmingham: Advantage West Midlands/ Midlands Clothing Link).
4.
Advantage West Midlands (2003) Delivering Advantage: West Midlands Economic Strategy and Action Plan: Update 2004-10, Consultation draft. (Birmingham: Advantage West Midlands).
5.
AminA.ThriftN. (2002) Cities: Reimagining the Urban. (Cambridge: Polity Press).
6.
AydalotP. (1986) Milieux Innovateurs en Europe (Paris: GREMI).
7.
BarnesS.DonnellyT.MorrisD. (2003) Restructuring the automotive industry in the English Midlands Region, Regional Studies Association Conference, Reinventing Regions in a Global Economy, 12–15 April, Pisa.
8.
BattersbyJ.BerkeleyN.ClarkG.Lawton Smith H.TraceyP.TullyJ.WojcikD. (2001) Questionnaire and Fieldwork Data (UK study). Working Paper (RASTEI Technical Paper) 01–15. (Oxford: School of Geography, University of Oxford).
9.
BenneworthP.WhiteheadF. (2001). Regional Development Agencies' approaches to cluster strategies. Regions, No. 234, August, pp. 6–9.
10.
BerkeleyN.P. (2003) A stitch in time? Institutional support for the clothing industry in the West Midlands region of the UK. Regional Studies Association Conference, Reinventing Regions in a Global Economy, 12–15 April, Pisa.
11.
BerkeleyN. P.SteuerN.GodfreyD. (2001) Industrial Development Strategy for the Coventry Clothing Sector. (Coventry: Emersons Press).
12.
ClarkC. (1940). The Conditions of Economic Progress. (London: Macmillan).
13.
CoeN. M. (2001) A hybrid agglomeration? The development of a satellite-Marshallian industrial district in Vancouver's film industry. Urban Studies, 38(10), pp. 1753–1775
14.
CookeP.MorganK. (1998) The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions and Innovation (Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
DTI (2001) Business Clusters in the UK: a First Assessment (Department of Trade and Industry, London: HMSO).
16.
FeserE.BergmanE. (2000) National industry cluster templates: a framework for applied regional cluster analysis, Regional Studies, 34(1), pp. 1–19
FloridaR. (1995) Toward the learning region, Futures: The Journal of Forecasting and Planning, 27, June, pp. 527–536.
19.
GordonI. R.McCannP. (2000) Industrial clusters: complexes, agglomerations and/or social networks. Urban Studies, 37(3), pp. 513–532.
20.
GranovetterM. (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91, pp. 481–510.
21.
HusbandJ.JerrardB. (2001) Formal aid in an informal sector: institutional support for ethnic minority enterprise in local clothing and textiles industries, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 27(1), pp.115–132.
22.
KrakteS. (2002) Network analysis of production clusters: the Potsdam/Babelsberg film industry as an example. European Planning Studies, 10(1), pp. 27–54
23.
MaillatD.KebirL. (1999) Learning region and territorial production systems, Revue d'Economie Regionale et Urbaine, 3, pp. 429–448.
24.
MarkusenA. (1996) Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts, Economic Geography, 72, pp. 293–313.
25.
MarshallA. (1890) Principles of Economies, 1st edn (London: Macmillan).
26.
MarshallN.WoodP. (1995) Services and Spaces. (Essex: Longman).
27.
MartinR.SunleyP. (2003) Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea?Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1), pp. 5–35.
28.
PeckF.McGuinnessD. (2003) Regional Development Agencies and cluster strategies: engaging the knowledge-base in the North of England, Local Economy, 18(1), pp. 49–62.
29.
PerrouxF. (1950) Economic space: theory and applications, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64, pp. 89–104
30.
PorterM. E. (1998) The Competitive Advantage of Nations (London: Macmillan).
31.
RosenfeldS. A. (1997) Bringing clusters into the mainstream of economic development, European Planning Studies, 5(1), pp. 3–23.
32.
TullyJ. M.BerkeleyN. P. (2002) Visualising the operation behaviour of SMEs in sector and cluster: evidence from the West Midlands, European Regional Science Association Conference, 27–31 August, Dortmund.
33.
WebbD.CollisC. (2000) Regional Development Agencies and the New Regionalism in England, Regional Studies, 34(9), pp. 857–864.
