Perspectives on lifestyle intervention: The views of general practitioners who have taken part in a health promotion study

Abstract

Aim: A study was carried out to discover the views of Danish general practitioners on the possibility of intervening in their patients' lifestyles in general and on the obstacles to doing so, based on their experience of participating in a health promotion study. Method: A focus group interview was conducted with five general practitioners who had participated in ``The Ebeltoft Health Promotion Study'' to assess their views on their preventive role. Results: The general practitioners have internalized the view advanced by society and the medical profession that they have an important role to play in preventing lifestyle-related illness. However, they are sceptical about the effectiveness of intervention and have ethical concerns about giving lifestyle advice. They are also somewhat irritated by the fact that patients are chiefly interested in having their health checked, rather than in following up by changing their behaviour. The general practitioners differ in their views as to when, and how actively, they should initiate discussions with individual patients to encourage them to change their lifestyles. Conclusions: If the medical profession and those responsible for overall health policy wish to make general practitioners change their behaviour towards their patients, it is important that they understand the aims, values, and working conditions of general practitioners that underlie their present attitudes and behaviour.

Keywords

Ebeltoft Health Promotion Study general practitioners health discussion and lifestyle health prevention health screening qualitative study

References

Sundhedsministeriet. Regeringens Folkesundhedsprogram 1999—2008 [The Government Public Health Programme 1999—2008]. Koebenhavn: Sundhedsministeriet , 1999.

Svendsen O. Praktiserende laeger som frontloebere i forebyggelsen [General practitioners in the forefront of prevention]. VITAL 1995(3):18—20.

Svendsen O. Forebyggelse i almen praksis [Prevention in general practice]. Ugeskr Laeger 1996;158:247.

Thom B. , Téllez C. A difficult business: detecting and managing alcohol problems in general practice . Br J Addict 1986;81:405—18.

Kottke TE , Willms G. , Solberg LI , Brekke ML Physician-delivered smoking cessation advice: issues identified during ethnographic interviews. Tob Control 1994;3:46—9.

Rush B. , Ellis K. , Crowe T. , Powell L. How general practitioners view alcohol use. Clearing up the confusion . Can Fam Physician 1994;40:1570—9.

Williams SJ , Calnan M. Perspectives on prevention: the views of general practitioners. Sociol Health Illn 1994; 16:372—93.

McIlvain HE , Crabtree F. , Gilbert C. , Havranek R. , Backer EL Current trends in tobacco prevention and cessation in Nebraska Physicians' Offices. J Fam Pract 1997;44:193—202.

Lawlor DA , Keen S. , Neal RD

Can general practitioners influence the nation's health through a population approach to provision of lifestyle advice?

Br J Gen Pract 2000; 50:455—9.

10.

Beich A. , Gannik D. , Malterud K. Screening and brief intervention for excessive alcohol use: qualitative interviews study of the experiences of general practitioners. Br Med J 2002;325(7369):870.

11.

Thune Jacobsen E. `Sundhedsprojekt Ebeltoft'. Praktiserende laegers vurdering af organisatoriske aspekter ved implementering af forebyggende helbredsundersoegelser og —samtaler i almen praksis [`Health care project Ebeltoft'. General pratitioners' assessment of the organizational aspects of implementing preventive health screenings and interviews in general practice] (DSI rapport 2001: 05). Koebenhavn: DSI, 2001.

12.

Lauritzen T. , Bach Nielsen KD , Leboeuf-Yde C. , Lunde IM Sundhedsprojekt Ebeltoft: Helbredsundersoegelser og helbredssamtaler i almen praksis. Basisdata fra en femaarig, prospektiv, randomiseret, kontrolleret befolkningsundersoegelse [Health care project Ebeltoft. Health screenings and health interviews in general practice. Basic data from a five-yearly, prospective, randomised, controlled population study]. Ugeskr Laeger 1997;159:3940—6.

13.

Engberg M. , Christensen B. , Karlsmose B. , Lous L. , Lauritzen T. General health screenings to improve cardiovascular risk profiles: a randomized controlled trial in general practice with 5-year follow-up. J Fam Pract 2002;51(5):546—52.

14.

Kanstrup H. , Refsgaard J. , Engberg M. , Lassen JF , Larsen ML , Lauritzen T. Cholesterol reduction following health screening in general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care 2002;20(4):219—23.

15.

Imperial Cancer Research Fund OXCHECK Study Group. Effectiveness of health checks conducted by nurses in primary care: final results of the OXCHECK study. Br Med J 1995;310:1099—104.

16.

Wood DA , Kinmouth AL , Davies GA , Yarwood J. , Thompson SG , Pyke SDM , et al. A randomised controlled trial evaluating cardiovascular screening and intervention in general practice: principal results of British family heart study. Br Med J 1994;308:313—20.

17.

Ebrahim S. , Davey Smith G. Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease (Cohrane Review). Cohrane Library 2001(3).

18.

Karlsmose B. , Lauritzen T. , Engberg M. , Parving A. A randomised controlled trial of screening for adult hearing loss during preventive health checks. Br J Gen Pract 2001;51(466):351—5.

19.

Jensen MS , Thomsen JL , Jensen SE , Lauritzen T. , Engberg M. Low prevalence of ischemic electrocardiographic findings in a Danish population. Scand Cardiovasc J 2003;37(1):49—57.

20.

Hartvigsen J. , Bakketeig LS , Leboeuf-Yde C. , Engberg M. , Lauritzen T. The association between physical workload and low back pain clouded by the `healthy worker' effect: population-based cross-sectional and 5-year prospective questionnaire study. Spine 2001;26(16):1788—92; discussion 1792—3.

21.

Basch CE Focus Group Interview: an underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Educ Q 1987;14:411—48.

22.

Kitzinger J. The methodology of Focus Groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol Health Illn 1994;16:103—21.

23.

Kitzinger J. Introducing focus groups. Br Med J 1995;311: 299—302.

24.

Kvale S. InterView. En introduktion til det kvalitative forskningsinterview [Interview. An introduction to the qualitative research interview]. Koebenhavn : Hans Reitzels Forlag, 1997.

25.

Thune Jacobsen E. , Timm HU Forebyggelse som led i behandlingen af rygproblemer. Undersoegt med udgangspunkt i de sundhedsprofessionelles perspektiv [Prevention as part of the treatment of back problems. Studied on the basis of the health professional perspective] (Forebyggelse og sundhedsfremme 1997/11). Koebenhavn: Sundhedsstyrelsen og DSI, 1997.

26.

Traeden UI , Zwisler ADO , Moeller L. , Toennesen H. Forebyggelse på danske sygehuse. En kortlaegning [Prevention in Danish hospitals. A survey.] Koebenhavn: Klinisk Enhed for Sygdomsforebyggelse, 2001.

27.

Morgan DL Designing focus group research. In: Stewart M , Tudiver F , Bass MJ , Dunn EV , Norton PG , editors. Tools for primary care research. London: Sage Publications, 1992: 1992:177—93.