The association of employment status and family status with health among women and men in four Nordic countries

Abstract

Aims: The Nordic countries have relatively equal employment participation between men and women, but some differences between countries exist in labour market participation. The aim was to examine the association between employment status and health among women and men in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, and analyse whether this association is modified by marital status and parental status. Methods: The data come from nationally representative cross-sectional surveys carried out in Denmark (n=2,209), Finland (n=4,604), Norway (n=1,844) and Sweden (n=5,360) in 1994—95. Women and men aged 25—49 were included. Employment status was categorized into full-time employed, part-time employed, unemployed, and housewives among women and into employed and unemployed among men. Health was measured by perceived health and limiting longstanding illness. Logistic regression analysis was used, adjusting for age and education. Marital status and parental status were analysed as modifying factors. Results: The non-employed were more likely to report perceived health as below good and limiting longstanding illness than the employed among both women and men. The association between employment status and perceived health remained unchanged when marital status and parental status were adjusted for among all men and Finnish women, but the association was slightly strengthened among Danish and Swedish women, with the housewives becoming more likely to report ill health than employed women. The association between employment status and limiting longstanding illness was slightly strengthened among women, and slightly weakened among Norwegian men when marital and parental status were adjusted for. Conclusions: Non-employment was associated with poorer health in all countries, although there are differences in the employment patterns between the countries. Among women marital status and parental status showed a modest or no influence on the association between employment status and health. Among men there was no such influence.

Keywords

Employment status marital status parental status gender health Denmark Finland Norway Sweden

References

Rubery J. , Smith M. , Fagan C. Women's employment in Europe. London: Routledge, 1999.

Anson O. , Anson J. Women's health and labour force status: An enquiry using a multi-point measure of labour force participation. Soc Sci Med 1987;25:57—63.

Arber S. , Lahelma E. Inequalities in women's and men's ill-health: Britain and Finland compared . Soc Sci Med 1993;37:1055—68.

Arber S. Comparing inequalities in women's and men's health: Britain in the 1990s. Soc Sci Med 1997;44:773—87.

Elstad JI Inequalities in women's health related to women's marital, parental, and employment status: A comparison between the early 70s and late 80s, Norway . Soc Sci Med 1996;42:75—89.

Waldron I. , Weiss CC , Hughes ME Interacting effects of multiple roles on women's health. J Health Soc Behav 1998;39:216—36.

Lahelma E. , Arber S. , Kivelä K. , Roos E. Multiple roles and health among British and Finnish women: The influence of socioeconomic circumstances . Soc Sci Med 2002;54:727—40.

Lahelma E. , Kivelä K. , Roos E. , Tuominen T. , Dahl E. , Diderichsen F. , Elstad JI , Lissau I. , Lundberg O. , Rahkonen O. , Rasmussen NK , Åberg Yngwe M. Analysing changes of health inequalities in the Nordic welfare states. Soc Sci Med 2002 ;55:609—25.

Ross & Mirowsky , Does employment affect health? J Health Soc Behav 1995;36:230—43.

10.

Klumb PL , Lampert T. Women, work, and well-being 1950—2000: A review and methodological critique . Soc Sci Med; in press.

11.

Goode W. A theory of role strain. Am Soc Rev 1960;25:483—96.

12.

Gove WR Gender differences in mental and physical illness: The effects of fixed roles and nurturant roles. Soc Sci Med 1984;19:77—91.

13.

Nathanson CA Social roles and health status among women: The significance of employment . Soc Sci Med 1980;14a:463—71.

14.

Arber S. Class , paid employment and family role : Making sense of structural disadvantage, gender and health status. Soc Sci Med 1991;32:425—36.

15.

Bartley M. , Sacker A. , Firth D. , Fitzpatrick R. Social position, social roles and women's health in England: Changing relationships 1984—1993. Soc Sci Med 1999;48:99—115.

16.

Popay J. , Bartley M. , Owen C. Gender inequalities in health: Social position, affective disorders and minor physical morbidity. Soc Sci Med 1993;36:21—32.

17.

Macran S. , Clarke L. , Joshi H. Women's health: Dimensions and differentials. Soc Sci Med 1996;42:1203—16.

18.

Martikainen P. Women's employment, marriage, motherhood and mortality: A test of the multiple role and role accumulation hypotheses. Soc Sci Med 1995;40:199—212.

19.

Roos E. , Lahelma E. , Virtanen M. , Prättälä R. , Pietinen P. Gender, socioeconomic status, and family status as determinants of food behaviour . Soc Sci Med 1998;46:1519—29.

20.

Kautto M , Heikkilä M , Hvinden B , Marklund S , Ploug N , editors. Scandinavian social policy. London: Routledge, 1999.

21.

Forssén K. Family policies and the economic wellbeing of children in some OECD countries . In: Social policy in tandem with the labour market in the European Union. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Publication 10,1999 :177—94.

22.

Marklund S. , Nordlund A. Economic problems, welfare convergence and political instability. In: Kautto M , Heikkilä M , Hvinden B , Marklund S , Ploug N , editors. Scandinavian social policy. London: Routledge, 1999: 19—53.

23.

OECD Employment outlook: Towards more and better jobs. Paris: OECD, 2003 [available at: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/ww2000/table5b.htm ].

24.

Palme J. , Bergmark Å. , Bäckman O. , Estrada F. , Fritzell J. , Lundberg O. , Sjöberg O. , Sommestad L. , Szebehely M.

A welfare balance sheet for the 1990s. Scand

J Public Health 2003; 3(Suppl. 60), p143.

25.

Available at: <www.kttl.helsinki.fi/englishResearchNordiccomparativestudies>.

26.

De Bruin AD , Pichavet HSJ , Nossikov A. Health interview surveys: Towards international harmonisation of methods and instrument. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Publications, 1996.

27.

Lahelma E. , Manderbacka K. , Rahkonen O. , Karisto A. Comparisons of inequalities in health: Evidence from national surveys in Finland, Norway and Sweden. Soc Sci Med 1994;38:517—24.

28.

Cavelaars AE , Kunsta AE , Geurts JJ , Crialesi R. , Grotvedt L. , Helmert U. , Lahelma E. , Lundberg O. , Matheson J. , Mielck A. , et al. Differences in self-reported morbidity by educational level: a comparison of 11 western European countries. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:219—27.

29.

Manderbacka K. Examining what self-rated health question is understood to mean by respondents. Scand J Soc Med 1998;26:145—53.

30.

Lundberg O. , Manderbacka K. Assessing the reliability of a measure of self-rated health. Scand J Soc Med 1996;24:218—24.

31.

Martikainen P. , Aromaa A. , Heliövaara M. , Klaukka T. , Knekt P. , Maatela J. , Lahelma E. Reliability of perceived health by sex and age. Soc Sci Med 1999;48:1117—22.

32.

Idler EL , Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality, a review of twenty-seven community studies . J Health Soc Behav 1997;38:21—37.

33.

Heistaro S. , Jousilahti P. , Lahelma E. , Puska P. Self-rated health and mortality: A long term prospective study in eastern Finland. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001;55:227—32.

34.

Blaxter M. A comparison of measures of inequality in morbidity. In: Fox J , editor. Health inequalities in European countries. Aldershot: Gower, 1989:199—230.

35.

Lahelma E. , Arber S. , Rahkonen O. , Silventoinen K. Widening or narrowing inequalities in health? Comparing Britain and Finland from the 1980s to 1990s. Sociol Health Illn 2000;22:110—36.