Abstract
The present experimental study has been conducted to evaluate the impact of an acoustic enclosure of high-pressure oil pump, which is used to reduce the noise emission of an automobile engine. The enclosure is double-layered and made of nylon 66 (PA66) as an outer structure and polyurethane foam as the inner material. The sound signals of the engine were measured separately without an acoustic enclosure and covered by the enclosure. The signals were measured with 5 microphones around the engine under two electric loading conditions (0% and 100% load). The results revealed that the sound pressure level (SPL) of the engine increased significantly with the high-pressure oil pump installed, and the gap between SPL was larger for 100% load than 0% load. Furthermore, the enclosure of high-pressure oil pump was effective to attenuate the engine noise at almost the entire audio frequency range. The SPL reduced approximately 2 dB within nearly the entire test frequency range, supporting the remarkable noise reduction effect of the high-pressure oil pump enclosure.
Introduction
In recent decades, with the rapid increase of vehicle ownership and the rising of living standards, people's awareness of environmental protection and requirements for quiet environment have been increasing [1]. And one of the most important requirement for car comfort is noise, vibration and harshness control (NVH),which is becoming an important part of vehicle sensory quality [2]. It can be harmful to drivers for long-term exposure to noise, distract the attention and easy to cause traffic accidents.
Previous studies have reported that engine noise is one of the most important noise sources, it consists of generator noise, combustion noise, high-pressure oil pump noise, gear noise, exhaust noise, fan noise etc [3, 4]. However of which high-pressure oil pump is used to supply the oil to the engine, and it will not only consume a part of the engine power, but also generate violent vibrations, leading to noise on the condition of high-speed operation. Therefore the noise of high-pressure oil pump cannot be overlooked. However, people mainly considered the rail pressure, displacement, type, volume efficiency, pressure pulsation and flow pressure in current designs of oil pump. Few studies have been conducted focusing on its noise problem [5]. This may be attributable to its complex structure and tedious production process [6]. In 2016, some factory has received complaints regarding high-pressure oil pump noise as high as 61, fully revealing that the noise research of high-pressure oil pump should be given more attention [7].
Lai et al. [8] designed three sound insulation boards with different structures and verified their effectiveness. The results showed that the noise of the shearing machine is reduced by 4–5 dB. Lu and Gao [9] analysed the 16∼31.5 Hz low-frequency noise characteristics before and during the control. The final test showed that the SPL in the resident areas I, II and III classified according to the severity of the interference can be reduced from 95 dB to 74, 91 dB to 66 and 83 dB to 65 dB. Cheng et al. [10] studied the energy transmission path and noise attenuation in double-wall structure based on the coupling equation, and summarised the approximation formula of the effect of gap on the low-order coupling frequency of the system. Beltman [11] set up a revised equation of vibration structure and compressible fluid by testing the noise with different frequency characteristics and modifying the DIANA element. The results show that different noise reduction methods are needed for different structures and different noise frequencies.
There are two main ways to control the engine noise: one is to optimise the design and development, the other is to use shield, including mufflers and sound shields. Noise energy is reasonably controlled by sound absorption, attenuation and reflection of sound insulation materials, and is eventually reduced to an acceptable level when transmitted to the outside world. The sound insulation cover can be made into single layer or multilayer, and can be metal or non-metal with different thickness [12].
These mathematical models are used for finite element calculation to identify and prevent engine noise. However, due to the ever-changing engine structure and the ever-changing operating conditions, the numerical calculation can only provide a theoretical basis for us [13].
Akei et al. [13] described a method of identifying surface vibration from ambient sound pressure, which was called Inverse Numerical Acoustics, and can be used to built a steady-state engine model. The noise level around the engine with sound absorbing materials and openings can be predicted by using this sound source model and boundary element method. Zheng et al. [14] used the transfer path analysis method as the boundary condition, and identified the influence of structural noise and airflow noise on subjective evaluation. The structural-borne input of hybrid FEA/SEA engine enclosure model was analysed. Augusztinovicz et al. [15] used the numerical simulation to calculation the engine with cover and without sound cover, and an experiment was carried out to compared with the calculation results. The decorative cover of the engine acts as a decorative part to play a decorative role. If a reasonable design structure and material selection are done, it will play an excellent role in noise reduction. Nowadays, nylon with fibre glass are widely used in engine cover, auxiliary materials such as polyurethane can be used to enhance sound absorption. This method is not limited to the application of automobile decorative cover [16]. The sound insulation hood is placed downstream of the noise source to prevent the difficulty of controlling the noise scattering. The area of noise reduction materials should not be too small, and should be as close as possible to noise sources. For engines, we should also pay attention to safety, heat resistance, flame retardancy and aging resistance of materials. High-pressure oil pump is one of the most important sources of vehicle noise. However little attention was given to the importance of the high-pressure oil pump as a noise source.
Materials and methods
Engine
The structure of the engine used in this study is shown in Figure 1 [17], while the red part is the high-pressure oil pump system and the high-pressure oil pump is located at the top of the engine. And the basic information of the engine is given in Table 1.
The structure of engine used in the study. The basic information of the engine.
Acoustic enclosure
The sound insulation ability of an acoustic enclosure depends on a variety of factors, such as the shape and size, structural rigidity, opening size, gap area, average sound absorption coefficient, sound insulation, loss factor, and so on. The commonly used sound insulation enclosure contains 5 types: open type, semi-open type, semi-open type with muffler, totally enclosed type and semi-open type with sound barrier. The structure diagrams are shown in Figure 2.
Several structural types of sound insulation.
Taking sound absorption material as inner material will greatly improve the insulation of the enclosure [18]. On account of this, a double-layer enclosure was developed using PA66 (Polyamide-66) with 4 mm thickness as the outer structure, and polyurethane(PU) foam with 8 mm thickness as the inner material, which belongs to semi-open enclosure. PA66 exhibits good strength and impact resistance, while PU is lightweight, waterproof and moisture-proof, convenient to process, and has excellent absorption capacity. Models of high-pressure oil pump, acoustic enclosure, and the assemble model are shown in Figure 3.
The models of high-pressure oil pump (a), acoustic enclosure (b), and assemble model (c).
Insertion loss IL is generally used to express the noise reduction effect of the acoustic enclosure. Since the sound insulation cover designed in this paper is semi-open, the sound isolation performance can be calculated in the following form [18]:
Acoustic performance test of the enclosure
Transfer Function Method was utilised to test the sound absorption performance of the inner PU foam and insulation of the double-layer enclosure. The test equipment is SW422 impedance tube and four-channel acoustic analyser coming from Beijing Prestige Sound Electrical Technology Co., LTD. The diameter of the impedance used here is 100 mm, and the test frequency bend is 63∼1600 Hz. The impedance tube test system and test sample are shown in Figure 4. The specific test principle is detailed in the international standard 15010534–2 and GB/T 18696.2 2002 [19].
The impedance tube test system (a) and test samples (b).
Test of the engine noise spectrum
In order to obtain the noise spectrum of the engine, 5 microphones are distributed around the engine, and are respectively located onthe top, the bottom, the front, the right, and the left of the engine. Under the 0% and 100%loads, the SPL of 5 points under one metre noise were tested, and the five-point average is obtained finally. Schematic diagram(a) and test chart(b) of microphone field distributionof engine acoustic test are shown in Figure 5.
Schematic diagram (a) and test chart (b) of microphone field distribution of engine acoustic test.
Instrumentation and signal processing
Specifications of the used instruments.
Notes: Piston sounder: B&K4231; Test standard: GB 1859–2000; Full anechoic chamber. Structure: Space: 9 m × 8 m × 7 m, flat sound absorbing material. Environmental control system produced by IMETCH. Ensure that the ambient temperature in the full anechoic chamber is 25 ± 3°C.
Sound absorption of the enclosure
Porous cell morphologiesof inner PU foam
Pore size and pore distribution are important parameters to govern the acoustic performance of porous acoustic materials. The scanning electron microscopy photos of the inner PU foam are tested to further analyse its acoustic performance. As shown in Figure 6, inner PU foam presented typical porous structures, and almost all the pores are open and connected to each other. Many litter pores (The aperture is 0.1–0.3 mm) distributed in the grain of larger pores (The aperture is 0.4–0.6 mm). Which indicates that the material has good sound absorption property [20].
Some SEM micrographs of PU foams.
Sound absorption of inner PU foam
The sound absorption coefficients of the inner PU foam of the enclosure are shown in Figure 7. The results indicated that the PU foam selected here exhibited good absorption performance. The sound absorption coefficients rise rapidly with the increase of frequency, until reaches the peak of 0.8 at 1600 Hz. However, the absorption performance at low frequency was not ideal because the inner foam was relatively thin, only 8 mm.
Sound absorption performance of the inner PU foam.
Sound insulation of the double layer enclosure
The sound insulation of the double-layer acoustic enclosure is shown in Figure 8. The results indicated that the acoustic enclosure showed good soundinsulationproperty. The sound insulation rise with the increase of frequency, and up to 24 dB at 1600 Hz.
Sound insulation of the double layer enclosure.
An acoustic enclosure was installed on the high-pressure oil pump of the engine, and one metre SPL was tested under 0% load condition. The SPL of the top site is shown in Figure 9. The results revealed that the overall noise of the engine is high, and the SPL is almost all above 70 dB over 1000 Hz. The SPL curve rises nearly in a straight line with the increase of frequency, and above 90 dB over 4800 Hz. It can be seen that the engine noise is concentrated at medium and high frequencies. The SPL decreased rapidly after the high-pressure oil pump was installed, and reduced more than 5 dB in most frequency bend, indicating that the high-pressure oil pump has great effect on the engine noise and should be focused on governance. However, when the acoustic enclosure was used, the engine noise rapidly reduced, especially at 3500 Hz, which declined by more than 5 dB, and at some frequency (1000 Hz)-SPL reduced as high as 7 dB. Even compared with the SPL without high-pressure oil pump, the complete engine noise decreased about 1 dB in most frequency bend, and at some frequency (1850Hz), the SPL reduced more than 2 dB. Additionally reduction is about 4 dB at about 1000 Hz.
SPL of the top site at 0% load condition of the engine.
The average SPL of the five sites under 0% load condition is shown in Figure 10. The results revealed that the average SPL slightly increased above 4000 Hz after the installation of high-pressure oil pump, and essentially remained unchanged above 4000 Hz. After the acoustic enclosure was installed, the SPL significantly reduced by about 2 dB. Further, it even reduced 1 dB more compared with the condition without high-pressure oil pump, showing that the acoustic enclosure has an obvious effect on engine noise elimination.
Average SPL of the five points at 0% load condition of the engine.
Noise reduction effect under 100% load
The SPL of the top site under 100% load condition is shown in Figure 11. The results revealed that the overall noise of the engine is high under 100% load condition, and increase obviously compared with 0% load condition. The SPL rises with the increase of frequency, and the rising speed is slightly slower than that of 0% load condition. The total noise increased significantly after high-pressure oil pump was installed. In some frequency bands, the SPL increased even to 10 dB. When the double layer acoustic enclosure was installed, the SPL of the engine decreased significantly, especially for the top measuring point.
SPL of the top site at 100% load condition of the engine.
The average SPL of the five sites under 100% load condition is shown in Figure 12. The results revealed that the SPL curve increases with the increase of frequency, but the rising speed is slightly slower than the SPL of 0% load. After the high-pressure oil pump was installed, the engine noise still remained significantly increased. Additionally, SPL increased at some frequency bands and reached 10 dB. The SPL of the engine clearly reduced after the acoustic enclosure was installed, especially for the top site. The SPL change for the average of five points is fundamentally consistent with the 0% load.
Average SPL of the five points at 100% load condition of the engine.
Conclusions
In this study, the noise reduction effect of a double layer acoustic enclosure of the high-pressure oil pump was experimentally measured. The data obtained from the experimental study for the SPL of the engine with and without the acoustic enclosure are presented. The results revealed that the SPL of the engine evidently increased after the high-pressure oil pump was installed, especially at frequencies below 4000 Hz. And the average SPL increased at approximately 8 dB, revealing that the high-pressure oil pump is a very important noise source for the engine. A double layer enclosure was developed using 4 mm thickness PA66 as an outer structure and 8 mm thickness polyurethane foam as the inner material, which is owning to the fact that PA66 has good impact resistance and the polyurethane foam showed an excellent absorption effect. Finally, one metre SPL was tested under 0% and 100% load conditions. The results indicated that the SPL is significantly reduced throughout the spectrum when the acoustic enclosure is installed, the SPL reduced by almost 2 dB within the entire test frequency, in addition to the SPL in a small band near 2000Hz changed little, showing a remarkable noise reduction effect of the high-pressure oil pump enclosure.
Footnotes
All support is greatly acknowledged and appreciated, especially the constructive discussions and criticism from colleagues.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
