The differential outcomes effect (DOE) pertains to enhanced conditional discrimination performance if each correct stimulus-choice sequence is always followed by a different outcome (e.g., food vs. water) compared to when each correct sequence is followed equally often by either outcome. The present experiments sought evidence of a DOE in pigeons, using biologically neutral outcomes. Experiment 1 replicated findings with rats demonstrating that a DOE can occur when one outcome is a biologically neutral light and the other is the absence of that light. Experiment 2 extended these findings by demonstrating a DOE when two biologically neutral outcomes of similar sensory and associative properties were employed.
References
1.
BrodiganD. L.PetersonG. B. (1976). Two-choice conditional discrimination performance of pigeons as a function of reward expectancy, prechoice delay, and domesticity.Animal Learning & Behavior4, 121–124.
2.
CarlsonJ. G.WielkiewiczR. M. (1976). Mediators of the effects of magnitude of reinforcement.Learning and Motivation7, 184–196.
3.
DeLongR. E.WassermanE. A. (1981). Effects of differential reinforcement expectancies on successive matching-to-sample performance in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes7, 394–412.
4.
FedorchakP. M.BollesR. C. (1986). Differential outcome effect using a biologically neutral outcome difference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes12, 125–130.
5.
FriedmanG. J.CarlsonJ. G. (1973). Effects of a stimulus correlated with positive reinforcement upon discrimination learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology97, 281–286.
6.
GoetersS.BlakelyE.PolingA. (1992). The differential outcomes effect.The Psychological Record42, 389–411.
7.
KruseJ. M.OvermierJ. B. (1982). Anticipation of reward omission as a cue for choice behavior.Learning and Motivation13, 505–525.
8.
PetersonG. B. (1984). How expectancies guide behavior.Animal cognition.RoitblatH. L.BeverT. G.TerraceH. S.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.135–148.
9.
PetersonG. B.TrapoldM. A. (1980). Effects of altering outcome expectancies on pigeons’ delayed conditional discrimination performance.Learning & Motivation11, 267–288.
10.
PetersonG. B.WheelerR. L.ArmstrongG. D. (1978). Expectancies as mediators in the differentialreward conditional discrimination performance of pigeons.Animal Learning & Behavior6, 279–285.
11.
PetersonG. B.WheelerR. L.TrapoldM. A. (1980). Enhancement of pigeons’ conditional discrimination performance by expectancies of reinforcement and nonreinforcement.Animal Learning & Behavior8, 22–30.
12.
SantiA. (1989). Differential outcome expectancies and directed forgetting effects in pigeons.Animal Learning & Behavior17, 349–354.
13.
TrapoldM. A. (1970). Are expectancies based upon different positive reinforcing events discriminably different?.Learning and Motivation1, 129–140.
14.
TrapoldM. A.OvermierJ. B. (1972). The second learning process in instrumental learning.Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory.BlackA. H.ProkasyW. F.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts427–452.
15.
UrcuioliP. J. (1990). Some relationships between outcome expectancies and sample stimuli in pigeons’ delayed matching.Animal Learning & Behavior18, 302–314.
