“You Have the River to Throw It Away”: Colombian Children's Reasoning About Transgressions to Nature in Contexts of Economic Performance and Communitarian Needs

Abstract

This study explored the reasoning, expectations, and judgments concerning prototypical transgressions to nature and contextualized situations entailing conflict of interest between conservation of nature and economic performance or communitarian needs. The authors interviewed 71 children from three grade levels (mean ages first grade = 5.91, fifth grade = 10.17, ninth grade = 14.48 years) who belong to two schools in Bogotá, Colombia, that are located in a zone with polluted rivers and wetlands with high levels of environmental risk. Results showed that children construct moral reasoning regarding prototypical and contextualized environmental transgressions, and their judgments vary due to informational assumptions. Children are very concerned about environmental transgressions as they recognize their impact on human welfare and the intrinsic value of nature, especially when they believe that there is a correspondence between humans and nature. Whereas young children focus on welfare, older children are also able to consider justice and harmony in their moral evaluations. Surprisingly, children of all ages tend to expect people to damage the environment even when there is no conflict of interest, and this could be related to exposure to degraded environments.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Davidson

, Turiel

, & Black

(1983). The effect of stimulus familiarity on the use of criteria and justifications in children's social reasoning. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 49–65.

Gaitán

, Cancino

, & Behrentz

(2007). Analysis of the air quality status in Bogota. Revista de Ingeniería, 26, 81–92.

Howe

, Kahn

P. H.

Jr. , & Friedman

(1996). Along the Rio Negro: Brazilian children's environmental views and values. Developmental Psychology, 32, 979–987.

Kahn

P. H.

(1999). The human relationship with nature development and culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kahn

P. H.

Jr. (2002). Children's affiliations with nature: Structure, development, and the problem of envrionmental generational amnesia. In P. H. Kahn & S. R. Kellert (Eds.), Children and nature psychological, sociocultural, and evoutionary investigations (pp. 93–116). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Kahn

P. H.

Jr. , & Friedman

(1995). Environmental views and values of children in an inner-city black community. Child Development, 66, 1403–1417.

Kahn

P. H.

Jr. , & Lourenço

(2002). Water, air, fire, and earth. A developmental study in Portugal of environmental moral reasoning. Environment and Behavior, 34, 405–430.

Kopnina

(2013). Evaluating education for sustainable development (ESD): Using ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the sustainable development (EAATSD) scale. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 15, 607–623.

Maslow

A. H.

(1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.

10.

Myers

O. E.

, & Saunders C

(2002). Animals as links toward developing caring relationships with the natural world. In P. H. Kahn & S. R. Kellert (Eds.), Children and nature psychological, sociocultural, and evoutionary investigations (pp. 153–178). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

11.

Nucci

(2008). Nice is not enough: facilitating moral development. New Jersey: Pearson.

12.

Posada

, & Wainryb

(2008). Moral development in a violent society: Colombian children's judgments in the context of survival and revenge. Child Development, 79, 882–898.

13.

Ribot

(2010). Vulnerability does not fall from the sky: Toward multi-scale, pro-poor climate policy. In R. Mearns & A. Norton (Eds.), Social dimensions of climate change: Equity and vulnerability in a warming world (pp. 47–74). Washington, DC: World Bank.

14.

Ruckert

J. H.

(2016) Generation conservation: Children's developing folkbiological and moral conceptions of protecting endangered species. Early Education and Development, 27, 1130–1144.

15.

Severson

, & Kahn

P. H.

(2010). In the orchard: Farm worker children's moral and environmental reasoning. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31, 249–256.

16.

Smetana

J. G.

(2013). Moral development: The social domain theory view. In P. D. Zelazo (Ed.), Oxford handbook of developmental psychology (vol. 1, pp. 832–863). New York, NY: Oxford University Press

17.

Turiel

(1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Wainryb

(1991). Understanding differences in moral judgments: The role of informational assumptions. Child Development, 62, 840–851.

19.

Wainryb

, & Brehl

(2006). I thought she knew that would hurt my feelings: Developing psychological knowledge and moral thinking. In R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 131–171). New York, NY: Academic Press.