Abstract
Abstract
Purpose:
To use reflective writing to evaluate a new required palliative care experience for third year medical students.
Method:
The authors used a constant comparison method based on grounded theory to conduct a thematic analysis of reflective writings produced by third-year medical students completing a mandatory week-long clinical rotation in palliative care during academic year 2010 at the University of Louisville.
Results:
Two broad thematic categories were identified: what the students learned and what the students experienced. Student writings revealed learning about palliative care (pain management, family meetings, goals of care, patient-family centered care, timing of palliative care, and delivering bad news); being a doctor (knowledge, communication, presence, empathy, not giving false hope, and person-focused care); the patient (importance of family, the experience of dying, and the uniqueness of each patient); and themselves (need to be non-judgmental, ability to do palliative care, self-limitations, becoming a better physician, and dealing with death). Student reflections centered on encounters with patients and families, internal emotional responses, and self-transformation.
Conclusions:
Systematic analysis of reflective writing provides educators with valuable data about students' learning experiences. These results may inform the design and modification of the curriculum.
Our patients aren't just objects that we are supposed to fix, but instead they are people with values and ideals that we must respect. This is a lesson that I learned while on that rotation that I will never forget …
I will never forget her facial expression or her verbalization of pain and how scared she was. I will also never forget how much I wanted to do something for her to alleviate her suffering.
Introduction
Experiential learning involves interpreting and integrating experience into existing knowledge structures to produce new knowledge. 3 D.A. Kolb refers to this as the experiential learning cycle. 4 According to Kolb, the learner emotionally transforms the experience into something meaningful through either (a) gaining new information by thinking, analyzing, or planning (abstract conceptualization or thinking) or (b) experiencing the concrete, tangible, felt qualities of the world (concrete experience or feeling).
Reflecting on experience is essential for self-discovery, self-regulation, and the therapeutic use of self in clinical situations and is important for professional development. 5 The aim of reflection is to inform future actions so they can be more purposeful and deliberate. 3 Reflection cultivates the self-awareness crucial to those providing compassionate care for seriously ill and dying patients. 1 Reflective writing, one tool for reflection, is an established method for teaching empathetic patient interactions 6 and has been linked to effective use of feedback and improved diagnostic accuracy. 7
Reflective activities have also been shown to provide a rich source of information about the “informal and hidden curriculum,” those things that are learned during the everyday experiences of students outside of the formal curriculum.8,9 Experiences in the clinical setting may well determine perceptions of acceptable behaviors and values as students enter the medical profession.10,11 Evaluations of student reflections can be an important tool for end-of-life curriculum planning, evaluation, and reform.1,9,12
In 2007, the University of Louisville School of Medicine redesigned the curriculum to integrate palliative care into all 4 years of medical school. With the assistance of mentors from the Medical College of Wisconsin, the project team evaluated the components of the existing curriculum, reworked the preclinical curriculum, developed novel educational materials, and developed a one-week required palliative care clinical rotation during the third-year Medicine clerkship. During this rotation, students were assigned to a palliative care program in a hospital setting where they rounded with the physician, provided medical care for palliative patients, completed learning modules on topics such as pain, symptom management, and communication, and responded to a structured clinical vignette designed to teach palliative care principles.
The new curriculum included a writing assignment in which students reflected on a patient interaction or experience related to palliative care. The assignment had two purposes: (1) to provide an opportunity for student reflection and (2) to provide evidence of the impact of the revised curriculum. The aim of this study was to use students' reflective writings to explore the value of this new mandatory palliative care experience for third-year medical students. Approval to conduct the research was granted by the University of Louisville's Human Subject Protection Program. The study was determined to be exempt as it was research conducted in an established educational setting for the purpose of evaluating instructional effectiveness and the identity of the students was not revealed to the research team.
Method
Data source
The assignment
For the reflective writing assignment, students were instructed to: (1) summarize a specific doctor-patient experience/encounter involving palliative care (a telling of the story without interpretation); (2) explore/interpret the possible meanings of the event; and (3) describe/predict how the knowledge gained from the encounter could be used professionally in the future. This assignment structure reflected the four phases of the experiential learning cycle as conceptualized by D.A. Kolb: (1) the learner has an experience; (2) the learner reflects on the experience; (3) the learner makes an attempt to understand his or her actions or reactions to the experience; and (4) the learner applies the new knowledge. 4 Papers were to be approximately one page in length and were submitted online.
All third-year medical students (academic year 2009–2010, n=155) completed the palliative care rotation during their medicine clerkship and submitted the required assignment at any chosen point before the end of the clerkship.
Sample selection
Student names were removed from the essays and the essays were copied to a computer disk. A member of the research team (BH) who had no previous contact with the students or their essays selected 40 essays randomly from the group of 155. It was believed that 40 essays would be manageable for in-depth analysis. The research team agreed that if data saturation was not evident after analyzing these essays, more would be selected and analyzed. The essays were assigned numbers, copied, and distributed to the six members of the research team.
Ensuring trustworthiness
The six members of the research team represented diverse backgrounds and included four Department of Medicine faculty members (three M.D.s and one Ph.D./social worker), the Associate Dean for Medical Education, and a Medicine resident. Each team member read the essays several times. Dialogue and peer debriefing ensured reliability of the overall findings. Random selection of the essays contributed to the data being representative of the whole. The process of conceptualizing categories, agreeing on domains and themes, and developing an overall scheme was documented at each meeting using flip charts, thereby providing a clear audit trail.
Analysis
Analysis proceeded using a constant comparison approach based on grounded theory.
13
Steps in the analysis follow:
(1) A “naïve” first reading of all essays. Researchers read all essays while “bracketing” or putting aside any preexisting ideas or thoughts about what should or might be revealed. Researchers noted themes that they observed separate from the data. (2) A second reading of essays and identification of quotes related to themes by coding in the margins. Both the first and second readings were done by each member of the team in isolation. (3) Development of an exhaustive list of themes. The team reached consensus regarding the dominant themes. The team concluded that data saturation had been achieved (no new themes emerged; repetition of those identified was evident). (4) Identification of two core domains encompassing the themes: what the students experienced and what the students learned. (5) Division of the team into two smaller groups, each assigned to one of the two domains. (6) Small-group “deconstruction” of the data by selecting quotes representative of the themes within each domain. (7) Small-group presentation of findings to the research team. (8) Development of consensus about the themes and quotes to include as representative of each domain.
Results
Initial coding of the data into themes delineated two broad domains: what the students learned and what the students experienced. These two domains reflect Kolb's two methods of transforming experience into meaning: (1) thinking, analyzing or planning (our domain of what the student learned) and (2) experiencing the felt qualities of the world (our domain of what the students experienced). Within each domain, further themes emerged during the constant comparison process.
What students learned
This domain encompassed the development of knowledge or skill and the modification of a behavioral tendency by experience. Student learning was further categorized into four topical areas or subdomains: learning about palliative care (Table 1); learning about being a doctor (Table 2); learning about the patient (Table 3); and learning about oneself (Table 4). Key points for each area evolved as the data were further analyzed. For most subdomains, there were five or more related quotes by students. The Tables include only key quotes selected to be representative of the students' thinking in each topical area. Students' writing was not edited.
What students experienced
Analysis revealed that the required palliative care experience was also an emotional experience for the students. This domain addressing what they experienced included three subdomains: intimate encounters with patients and families, internal emotional responses, and transformation and journey in patient experiences. Representative quotes from the data are displayed in Table 5.
Discussion
What we learned
What we learned about the students
Analysis revealed that the students' experiences with dying patients and their exposure to palliative care left them with positive attitudes related to the practice of palliative care. Specifically, they learned that the physician-patient encounter can provide healing and help prepare patients and families for life-changing experiences.
Similar to other studies, 8 , 14 we found that both positive and negative observations shape student perceptions of the profession and its values. These observations also contribute to development of their professional identities and shape their views about the physicians they want to become. Their writings conveyed realization of the privilege of being a physician and the immense responsibility that accompanies this role.
The writings provide evidence that the clinical experience in palliative care made them more prepared. They learned first-hand about pain management, the power of the family meeting, and giving bad news. They experienced empathy as they identified with patient situations (“he is a young man around my age which wasn't something I was prepared for …”, “I sat down on his bed like he was my brother.”), and reflected on mortality (“I know how fleeting life is,” “we will never beat death.”).
Many students reflected upon medicine's tendency to evaluate patients based upon objective measures (patient's outward physical appearance, vital signs, physical exam, or lab results) and “lump” them into disease categories. After this clinical exposure, students realized they often lost sight of the uniqueness of the individual. The palliative care experience served as a reminder of how physicians should actually relate to and treat “our fellow human beings.”
Students also realized the importance of being “present” for the patients. We were struck by how descriptive their writings were. They were truly in the moment with their patients, and evidence of the depth of their presence manifested itself in the richness of their descriptions. Many students indicated that being able to spend time with patients, learning their stories, and relating to them as fellow human beings were the reasons why they became physicians. They rediscovered their initial motivation and interest in medicine during their palliative care experience.
What we learned about the curriculum
Previous authors have suggested that didactic training in palliative medicine is not adequate preparation to enable students to provide such care.1,8 Students also need role models and experiences with both positive and negative behaviors. In our analysis, we found this to be true. Students were extremely impressed by their observations of palliative care physicians in action, and their eyes were opened to improper treatment of seriously ill patients, be it poor pain management, inadequate education, discrimination, or an unwillingness to be present to the patient's suffering. In many of their reflective writings, the students clearly state they had learned both what to do and not do on the basis of their observations of medical practitioners. According to Karniele-Miller and colleagues, these experiences compose the “informal curriculum” that shapes students' perceptions of professionalism. 8
Students reported observing essential skills (i.e., giving bad news, conducting a family conference, or setting goals of care) that will provide guidance to them in future practice. Most would agree that students should not be expected to use a skill they haven't observed, 1 but without a palliative care rotation, most students' medical education would be void of such exposure. Pain management was frequently cited as an area of new learning, whereas management of other symptoms was not viewed as noteworthy by these students. Perhaps this reflects an area of medical practice (pain management) that is severely neglected during the course of medical education unless it is taught during exposure to palliative care.
During analysis, themes emerged that reflect student exposure to all six core competency domains defined by the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine work group 15 and adopted by the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) as standards for palliative medicine education 16 (see Table 6). Learning objectives guiding the revised curriculum were structured to address all of these domains. The reflective writing analysis validated progress toward student mastery of the objectives.
Student exposure to interdisciplinary teams was an initial goal of the curricular redesign. Although some students did refer to the “team,” this did not evolve as a significant theme in the coding process. Realizing the need for interdisciplinary learning, our research team has since received funding for the development and testing of an interdisciplinary palliative care curriculum involving students from medicine, nursing, social work, and chaplaincy in interdisciplinary learning opportunities.
Limitations
One significant limitation of our study is that the data are drawn from a single academic center. In addition, the reflections were written at different times during the medical clerkship as students rotated through palliative medicine at various points during the 12-week experience. Experiences either before or after the week in palliative medicine could have had an impact on their essays, which is unaccounted for in the analysis.
Conclusion
Our in-depth qualitative analysis of the reflective writings of third-year medical students completing a mandatory week-long rotation in palliative care supports the call for “hands on” teaching and role modeling via a clinical experience 1 and “reflective time” 17 as essential components of palliative medical education. If physicians are to effectively care for the dying, they must participate in the clinical care of the dying as part of their educational experience. 18 Such exposure teaches not only the skills and knowledge required in palliative care but also compassionate, person-centered care crucial to all medical practice. The reflections of these students provided insight into learning not easily measured by traditional evaluation techniques (i.e., pre-test, post-test, knowledge-based questions)—learning that, in their own words, they will never forget.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation funded the revision of the curriculum discussed in this article. Ethical approval was granted by the University of Louisville's Human Subject Protection Program.
Author Disclaimer Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
