BovbjergR.SloanF.DorA.HsiehC. (1991). Juries and justice: Are malpractice and other injuries created equal? Law and Contemporary Problems, 54, 5–42.
2.
BreederD. (1959). The University of Chicago jury project. Nebraska Law Review, 38, 744–760.
3.
CatherC.GreeneE.DurhamR. (1996). Plaintiff injury and defendant reprehensibility: Implications for compensatory and punitive damage awards. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 189–205.
4.
GalanterM. (1988). The life and times of the big six; or, the federal courts since the good old days. Wisconsin Law Review, 1988, 921–954.
5.
GoodmanJ.GreeneE.LoftusE. (1989). Runaway verdicts or reasoned determinations: Mock juror strategies in awarding damages. Jurimetrics Journal, 29, 285–309.
6.
GoodmanJ.LoftusE.MillerM.GreeneE. (1991). Money, sex and death: Gender bias in wrongful death damage awards. Law and Society Review, 25, 263–282.
7.
GreeneE. (1989). On juries and damage awards: The process of decision making. Law and Contemporary Problems, 52, 225–246.
8.
HammittJCarrollS.ReliesD. (1985). Tort standards and jury decisions. Journal of Legal Studies, 14, 751–762.
9.
HansV.ErmannM. (1989). Responses to corporate versus individual wrongdoing. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 151–166.
10.
HorowitzI.BordensK. (1990). An experimental investigation of procedural issues in complex tort trials. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 269–285.
11.
KoenigT.RustadM. (1993). The quiet revolution revisited: An empirical study of the impact of state tort reform of punitive damages in products liability. The Justice System Journal, 16, 21–44.
12.
MacCounR. (1996). Differential treatment of corporate defendants by juries: An examination of the “deep-pockets” hypothesis. Law and Society Review, 30, 121–161.
13.
PetersonM. (1984). Compensation for injuries: Civil jury verdicts in Cook County. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.
14.
PetersonM. (1987). Civil juries in the 1980's: Trends in jury trials and verdicts in California and Cook County, Illinois. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.
15.
RaitzA.GreeneE.GoodmanJ.LoftusE. (1990). Determining damages: The influence of expert testimony on juror's decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 385–395.
16.
RodgersG. (1991). Factors contributing to compensatory damage awards in product liability cases involving personal injury. Journal of Products Liability, 13, 19–29.
17.
SaksM.HollingerL.WisslerR.EvansD.HartA. (1997). Reducing variability in civil jury awards. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 243–256.
18.
VidmarN. (1993). Empirical evidence on the “deep pockets” hypothesis: Jury awards for pain and suffering in medical malpractice cases. Duke Law Journal, 43, 217–266.
19.
VidmarN.LeeJ.CohenE.StewartA. (1994). Damage awards and jurors' responsibility ascriptions in medical versus automobile negligence cases. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 12, 149–160.
20.
WisslerR.EvansD.HartA.MorryM.SaksM. (1997). Explaining “pain and suffering” awards: The role of injury characteristics and fault attributions. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 181–207.