Past scientific assessments of global climate change impacts have tended to give us information on global impacts. But scientists have been refining their predictions down to regional, national and local levels. Improved understanding of climate change impacts, and particularly more specific information on which countries are most vulnerable, will affect international co-operation. Presumably, countries that are most vulnerable to climate change will be more likely to join international efforts to address climate change. At least that is what one could logically hypothesise. Questions addressed include: Does ‘vulnerability’ to climate change matter for international cooperation? What might be the political impact of improved understanding of the effects of climate change on international environmental co-operation?
References
1.
AndresenS.OstrengW. (eds.) (1989), International Resource Management: The Role of Science and Politics, London: Belhaven.
2.
BenedickR.E. (1998), Ozone Diplomacy, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
3.
CaldwellL.K. (1990), Between Two Worlds: Science, the Environmental Movement, and Policy Choice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
CollierU.LofstedtR.E. (1997), ‘Think Globally, Act Locally? Local Climate Change and Energy Policies in Sweden and the UK’, Global Environmental Change7(1), pp. 25–40.
5.
DrakeF. (2000), Global Warming: The Science of Climate Change, New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
GelbspanR. (1997), The Heat is On: The High Stakes Battle Over Earth's Threatened Climate, New York: Addison-Wesley.
HaasP.M. (1992), ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, International Organization46(1).
9.
HarrisP.G. (1996), ‘Considerations of Equity and International Environmental Institutions’, Environmental Politics5(2), pp. 274–301.
10.
HarrisP.G. (1997), ‘Affluence, Poverty and Ecology: Obligation, International Relations and Sustainable Development’, Ethics and the Environment2(2), pp. 121–138.
11.
HarrisP.G. (1998a), ‘Les Etats-Unis: Un Joueur Clé’, Liaison Energy Francophonie39, pp. 11–15.
12.
HarrisP.G. (1998b), Understanding America's Climate Change Policy: Realpolitik, Pluralism and Ethical Norms, Oxford: Oxford Centre for the Environment, Ethics and Society.
13.
HarrisP.G. (1999a), ‘Common but Differentiated Responsibility: The Kyoto Protocol and United States Policy’, Environmental Law Journal7, pp. 27–48.
14.
HarrisP.G. (1999b), ‘Sharing the Costs of Climate Change: An Assessment of American Foreign Policy’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs12(2), 289–310.
15.
HarrisP.G. (ed.), (2000a), Climate Change and American Foreign Policy, New York: St Martin's Press.
16.
HarrisP.G. (2000b), ‘Climate Change and American Foreign Policy: An Introduction’ in HarrisPaul G. (ed.), Climate Change and American Foreign Policy, New York: St Martin's Press, pp. 3–25.
17.
HoughtonJ.J. (eds.) (1996), Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
IPCC (1995), IPCC Working Group III, ‘Summary for Policymakers: The Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change’, in BruceJ.P.LeeH.HaitesE. (eds.), Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–16.
KeohaneR.O.NyeJ.S. (1989), Power and Interdependence, Boston: Little, Brown.
21.
KristoffN.D. (1997), ‘Global Warming: Around the Globe, Big Worries and Small Signs of Progress’, New York Times (1 December).
22.
LiefferinkD. (1996), Environment and the Nation State: The Netherlands, the EU, and Acid Rain, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
23.
MichaelA.J. (eds.) (1996), Climate Change and Human Health, Geneva: World Health Organisation.
24.
PanemS. (ed.) (1983), Public Policy, Science, and Environmental Risk, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
25.
PhilanderS.G. (1998), Is the Temperature Rising? The Uncertain Science of Global Warming, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26.
PortneyK.E. (1992), Controversial Issues in Environmental Policy: Science vs. Economics vs. Politics, Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.
27.
Union of Concerned Scientists and Tellus Institute (1998) ‘A Small Price to Pay: US Action to Curb Global Warming Is Feasible and Affordable’, Union of Concerned Scientists, July.
28.
WatsonR.T.ZinyoweraM.C.MossR.H. (eds.) (1996), Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-technical Analyses, New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
WatsonR.T.ZinyoweraM.C.MossR.H. (eds.) (1998), The Regional Impacts of Climate Change: An Assessment of Vulnerability, IPCC Working Group II Special Report, http://www.ipcc.ch/pub/sr97.htm.
30.
WetstoneG.RosencranzA. (1983), Acid Rain in Europe and North America, Washington, D.C.: Environmental Law Institute.
31.
World Resources Institute (1998), World Resources 1998–99: Environmental Change and Human Health, New York: Oxford University Press.
