T-NDX Diagram: Educational Technology Used to Teach Diagnostic Reasoning Based on Nursing Theories

Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe an educational technology to be applied to the teaching and learning of diagnostic judgment based on nursing theories.

METHODS

A methodological study with 10 stages for the development of educational technology.

FINDINGS

An innovative educational technology is proposed to incorporate theoretical and methodological domains in a V-shaped diagram for the diagnosis judgment.

CONCLUSIONS

The technology is innovative in integrating theory and method in a more comprehensive and original way, considering the philosophies and world views of students throughout the reasoning process.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

T-NDx Diagram may be useful in enhancing the integration of philosophical and theoretical knowledge and diagnostic judgment, especially for nursing undergraduate students.

Objetivo

descrever uma tecnologia educacional para ensinar e aprender o raciocínio diagnóstico baseado em teorias de enfermagem.

Métodos

estudo metodológico dividido em dez etapas para o desenvolvimento de uma tecnologia educacional.

Resultados

uma tecnologia educacional inovadora é proposta para incorporar domínios teóricos e metodológicos em um diagrama em forma de V para fins de julgamento de diagnóstico.

Conclusão

a tecnologia é inovadora na integração de teoria e método de um modo mais abrangente e inovador, considerando as filosofias e visões de mundo dos alunos ao longo do processo de raciocínio.

Implicações para a prática de enfermagem

O Diagrama T-NDx pode ser útil para melhorar a integração de conhecimento filosófico e teórico e julgamento diagnóstico, especialmente para estudantes de graduação em enfermagem.

Keywords

Nursing diagnosis nursing education nursing theory methodological research in nursing theoretical models Diagnóstico de Enfermagem Teoria de Enfermagem Educação em enfermagem Modelos Teóricos Pesquisa Metodológica em Enfermagem

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amante

L. N.

Anders

J. C.

Meirelles

B. H. S.

Padilha

M. I.

Kletemberg

D. F.

(2010). A interface entre o ensino do processo de enfermagem e sua aplicação na prática asistencial. Revista Eletrônica Enfermagem, 12(1), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.5216/ree.v12i1.9538

Almeida

M. A.

(2002). Competências e o processo ensino-aprendizagem do diagnóstico de enfermagem: Concepções de docentes e discentes. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.

Banning

(2008a). Clinical reasoning and its application to nursing: Concepts and research studies. Nurse Education in Practice, 8(3), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2007.06.004

Banning

(2008b). A review of clinical decision making: Models and current research. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01791.x

Bittencourt

G. K. G. D.

Crossetti

M. G. O.

(2017). Critical thinking skills in the nursing diagnosis process. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 47(2), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342013000200010

Carvalho

E. C.

Bachion

M. M.

Ferraz

A. E. P.

Veiga

E. V.

Ruffino

M. C.

Robazzi

M. L. C. C.

(1996). The process of diagnosis and its teaching. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 30(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62341996000100004

Carvalho

E. C.

Oliveira-Kumakura

A. R. S.

Morais

S. C. R. V.

(2017). Clinical reasoning in nursing: Teaching strategies and assessment tools. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 70(3), 662–668. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0509

Cerullo

J. A. S. B.

Cruz

D. A. L. M.

(2010). Clinical reasoning and critical thinking. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 18(1), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692010000100019

Chou

M. H.

Lee

L. C.

(2007). Initial formation of nursing philosophies following fundamental clinical practice: The experience of male nursing students. The Journal of Nursing Research: JNR, 15(2), 127–137. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17551894

10.

Conselho Federal de Enfermagem (COFEN) . (2009). Resolução 358 de 15 de outubro de 2009. Dispõe sobre a Sistematização da Assistência de Enfermagem e a implementação do Processo de Enfermagem em ambientes, públicos ou privados, em que ocorre o cuidado profissional de Enfermagem, e dá outras providências. Brasília, Brazil: Conselho Federal de Enfermagem. Retrieved from http://www.cofen.gov.br/resoluo-cofen-3582009_4384.html

11.

deSousa

V. E. C.

deOliveira Lopes

M. V.

Keenan

G. M.

Lopez

K. D.

(2018). Developing and testing of a software prototype to support diagnostic reasoning of nursing students. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 29(2), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12145

12.

Fawcett

DeSanto-Madeya

(2013). Contemporary nursing knowledge: Analysis and evaluation of nursing models and theories (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.

13.

Fawcett

(1984). The metaparadigm of nursing: Present status and future refinements. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 16(3), 84–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1984.tb01393.x

14.

Gallavan

N. P.

Kottler

(2007). Eight types of graphic organizers for empowering social studies students and teachers. Social Studies, 98(3), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.3200/TSSS.98.3.117-128

15.

Gowin

Alvarez

(2005). The art of educating with V Diagrams (1st ed.). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Herdman

T. H.

Kamitsuru

(Eds.). (2014). NANDA International nursing diagnoses: Definitions and classification, 2015-2017. Oxford, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell.

17.

International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) . (2018). Standards for educators. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/standards/for-educators

18.

Januszewski

Molenda

(2008). Educational technology: A definition with commentary. New York, NY: Routledge.

19.

Kao

H. F. S.

Reeder

F. M.

Hsu

M. T.

Cheng

S. F.

(2006). A Chinese view of the Western nursing metaparadigm. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 24(2), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898010105282516

20.

Lira

A. L. B. C.

Lopes

M. V. O.

(2011). Nursing diagnosis: Educational strategy based on problem-based learning. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 19(4), 936–943. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692011000400012

21.

Lunney

(2011). Pensamento crítico para o alcance de resultados positivos em saúde. Análise e estudos de caso em enfermagem. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Artmed.

22.

Kim

H. S.

(2010). The nature of theoretical thinking in nursing (3rd ed.). Danvers, MA: Springer Publishing Company.

23.

Menezes

S. S. C.

Corrêa

C. G.

Silva

R. C. G.

Cruz

D. A. M. L.

(2015). Clinical reasoning in undergraduate nursing education: A scoping review. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 49(6), 1032–1039. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342013000200010

24.

Muis

K. R.

Duffy

M. C.

(2013). Epistemic climate and epistemic change: Instruction designed to change students' beliefs and learning strategies and improve achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029690

25.

Oliveira Lopes

M. V.

Silva

V. M.

Herdman

T. H.

(2015). Causation and validation of nursing diagnoses: A middle range theory. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 28(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12104

26.

Ramalho Neto

J. M.

Bezerra

P. A. P. L.

Nóbrega

M. M. L.

Soares

M. J. G. O.

Fernandes

M. G. M.

(2012). Nursing assistance systematization: Terms, theoretical referential and phases of nursing process. Journal of Nursing UFPE, 6(7), 2617–2624. https://doi.org/10.5205/1981-8963-v6i11a7627p2617-2624-2012

27.

Renpenning

K. M.

SozWiss

G. B.

Denyes

M. J.

Orem

D. E.

Taylor

S. G.

(2011). Explication of the nature and meaning of nursing diagnosis. Nursing Science Quarterly, 24(2), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318411399451

28.

Fox

(2007). Gowin's knowledge vee and the integration of philosophy and methodology: A case study. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(2), 269–284, https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260601063735

29.

Silva

A. G. I.

Peixoto

M. A. P.

Brandão

M. A. G.

Ferreira

M. A.

Martins

J. S. A.

(2011). Nursing students' difficulties in the learning of diagnostics in nursing, in a metacognitive. Escola Anna Nery, 15(3), 466–471. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-81452011000300004

30.

Silva

C. C.

Oliveira

A. K. S.

Egry

E. Y.

Lima Neto

E. A.

Anjos

U. U.

Silva

A. T. M. C.

(2013). Constructing a Gowin's V diagram to analyze academic work in nursing. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 47(3), 709–713. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420130000300026

31.

Smith

B. E.

(1992). Linking theory and practice in teaching basic nursing skills. Journal of Nursing Education, 31(1), 16–23.

32.

Sousa

A. T. O.

Formiga

N. S.

Oliveira

S. H. S.

Costa

M. M. L.

Soares

M. J. G. O.

(2015). Using the theory of meaningful learning in nursing education. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 68(4), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167.2015680420i

33.

Sørensen

E. E.

Hall

E. O. C.

(2011). Seeing the big picture in nursing: A source of human and professional pride. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(10), 2284–2291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05639.x

34.

U. S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology . (2015). Ed Tech Developer's Guide. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://tech.ed.gov

35.

Thompson

Dowding

(2009). Essential decision making and clinical judgement for nurses (1st ed.). London, U.K.: Elsevier.

36.

Yura

Torres

(1975). Today's conceptual framework within baccalaureate nursing programs. In Faculty-curriculum development. Part III: Conceptual framework-Its meaning and function (pp. 17–25). New York: National League for Nursing.