The Effect of Web-Based Nursing Process Teaching on Senior Nursing Students’ Care Planning Skills #

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of web-based nursing process teaching on senior nursing students’ care plan preparation skills.

METHODS

Pretest-posttest intervention design was used. A total of 131 senior nursing students were evaluated for 5 weeks. Data were collected using a datasheet, a nursing care plan (pretest-posttest), and a self-efficacy form.

FINDINGS

The intervention group had significantly higher data collection, planning stage scores, and a total care plan score than the others. The intervention group was competent in all self-efficacy items, except the one concerning prioritizing nursing diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Web-based nursing process teaching offered with the curriculum helps students to develop care planning skills.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

It is necessary to focus on different teaching methods and using standardized terminology in teaching the nursing process.

AMAÇ

Web tabanlı hemşirelik süreci öğretiminin son sınıf hemşirelik öğrencilerinin bakım planı hazırlama becerisine etkisini değerlendirmektir.

YÖNTEM

ön test son test kontrol gruplu desen kullanılmıştır. Toplam 131 öğrenci katılmış ve müdahale 5 hafta sürmüştür. Veriler, tanıtıcı özellikler formu, hemşirelik bakım planı (ön test-son test) ve öz yeterlilik formu ile toplanmıştır.

BULGULAR

Müdahale grubunun veri toplama, planlama ve toplam bakım planı puanları kontrol grubundan istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir şekilde yüksek bulunmuştur. Ayrıca müdahale grubundaki öğrenciler öz yeterlilikle ilgili maddelerde hemşirelik tanılarını önceliklendirme dışındaki tüm maddelerde kendilerini yeterli hissettikleri belirtilmiştir.

SONUÇ

Müfredat programına ek olarak verilen web tabanlĲ hemşirelik süreci öğretimi, öğrencilerin bakım planlama becerilerini geliştirmelerine yardımcı olur.

HEMŞIRELIK UYGULAMALARINA ETKISI

Hemşirelik sürecinin öğretiminde farklı öğretim yöntemlerine ve standart terminolojiye odaklanmak gerekir.

Keywords

Care plan nursing process nursing student self-efficacy web-based teaching

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Açıksöz

Uzun

Ş.

Arslan

(2016). Assessment of relationship between nursing students’ self-efficacy and levels of their anxiety and stress about clinical practice. Gülhane Medical Journal, 58, 129–135.

Andsoy

I. I.

Güngör

Dikmen

Nabel

E. B.

(2013). Difficulties that nurses have in using care plan. Journal of Contemporary Medicine, 3(2), 88–94.

Bada

S. O.

Olusegun

(2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66–70.

Banamwana

Smith

A. M.

(2015). Evaluation of the use and value of nursing care plans in nursing practice at a referral hospital, Kigali, Rwanda: Nurses’ perspectives. Rwanda Journal, 2(2), 76.

Berman

Snyder

S. J.

Frandsen

(Eds.). (2016). Kozier&Erb's fundamentals of nursing, concepts, process, and practice (10 ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey: Julie Levin Alexander.

Bhandari

Pareek

Vashisht

Kalia

(2016). Nursing competency self efficacy (NCSE) scale for outgoing nursing students. IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science (IOSR-JNHS), 5(1), 56–63.

Bilgiç

Ş.

Temel

Çelikkalp

Ü.

(2017). Assessment of learned resourcefulness, self-efficacy and hope levels of nursing students: A case study Tekirdağ. Journal of Health and Nursing Management, 3(4), 117–126.

Bloomfield

Roberts

While

(2010). The effect of computer-assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the acquisition and retention of handwashing theory and skills in pre-qualification nursing students: A randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(3), 287–294.

Bulechek

G. M.

Butcher

H. K.

Dechterman

J. M.

Wagner

(2013). Nursing interventions classification (NIC) (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier/Mosby.

10.

Dobre

(2012, October). Web-based training systems—evaluation and measurement of their quality component. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Virtual Learning ICVL, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania.

11.

Fesci

Dogan

Pinar

(2008). Nurses working in medical clinics in patients care were faced difficulties and their suggestions for solution. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 11(3), 40–50.

12.

Gerdprasert

Pruksacheva

Panijpan

Ruenwongsa

(2010). Development of a web-based learning medium on mechanism of labour for nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 30(5), 464–469.

13.

Gerdprasert

Pruksacheva

Panijpan

Ruenwongsa

(2011). An interactive web-based learning unit to facilitate and improve intrapartum nursing care of nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 31(5), 531–535.

14.

Hagos

Alemseged

Balcha

Berhe

Aregay

(2014). Application of nursing process and its affecting factors among nurses working in Mekelle Zone Hospitals, Northern Ethiopia. Nursing Research and Practice, 2014, 675212 .

15.

Hakverdioğlu Yönt

Akın Korhan

Erdemir

Müller-Staub

(2014). Nursing diagnoses determined by first year students: A vignette study. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 25(1), 39–42.

16.

Halim

N. D. A.

Ali

M. B.

Yahaya

(2010, October). Personalized learning environment: A new trend in online learning. Paper presented at the Education Postgraduate Research Seminar 2010 (Edupres ’10), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia.

17.

Jakubec

Astle

(2019). Communication and relational practice. In Astle

Duggleby

(Eds.), Canadian fundamentals of nursing (6th ed.). Ontario, Canada: Elsevier.

18.

Joseph

(2017). The need of nursing care plans in hospitals. Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research, 6, 318–322.

19.

Karadağ

Aksoy Derya

Ucuzal

(2011). The self-efficacy-sufficiency levels of a health college student. Maltepe University Journal of Nursing Science and Art e-Journal, 4(1), 13–20.

20.

Karadakovan

Yeşilbakan

Ö. U.

(2004). The investigation of the NANDA nursing diagnosis determined by the students on neurological patient. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 7(3), 1–7.

21.

Kaya

Babadağ

Yeşiltepe Kaçar

Uygur

(2010). Nurses’ nursing model/theory, nursing process, and classification systems know and implication status. Maltepe University Journal of Nursing Science and Art e-Journal, 3(3), 24–33.

22.

Keski

Ç.

Karadağ

(2010). Investigation of knowledge levels of final year nursing students regarding nursing process. Turkish Journal of Research & Development in Nursing, 12(1), 41–52.

23.

Levitin

Kushnir

(2012). The Nursing Process Self Efficacy Scale: Introducing a new research tool . Retrieved from https://docplayer.net/25161863-The-nursing-process-self-efficacy-scale.html

24.

Mahmoud

M. H.

Bayoumy

H. M.

(2014). Barriers and facilitators for execution of nursing process from nurses' perspective. International Journal, 2(2), 300–315.

25.

NANDA-I. (2012). Nursing diagnoses, definition and classifications 2012–2014, Chichester, UK: NANDA International.

26.

Nettina

(2015). Nursing practice and the nursing process. In Nettina

(Ed.), Lippincott manual of nursing practice (10th ed.). Waltham, MA: Wolters Kluwer Health.

27.

Nursing Regulation . (2010). Official paper, number: 27515.

28.

Özmen

(2004). learning theories and technology aided constructivist learning in science teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET, 3(1), 100–111.

29.

Öztürk

Dinç

(2014). Effect of web-based education on nursing students' urinary catheterization knowledge and skills. Nurse Education Today, 34(5), 802–808.

30.

Sarita

(2017). Constructivism: A new paradigm in teaching and learning. International Journal of Academic Research and Development, 2(4), 183–186.

31.

Seaback

W. W.

(2006). Nursing process: Concepts and application (2nd ed.). Quebec, Canada: Thomson Delmar Learning.

32.

Sharma

M. S.

Bansal

(2017). Constructivism as paradigm for teaching and learning. International Journal of Physical Education, Sports and Health, 4(5), 209–212.

33.

Swearingen

P. L.

(2016). All-in-one nursing care planning resources (4th ed.). Maryland Heights, MO: Elsevier.

34.

Şendir

Acaroğlu

Aktaş

(2009). The knowledge and views of fourth class nursing school students about nursing process. Istanbul University Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing, 17(3), 166–173.

35.

Takahashi

A. A.

Barros

A. L. B. L.

Michel

J. L. M.

Souza

M. F.

(2008). Difficulties and facilities pointed out by nurses of a university hospital when applying the nursing process. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 21(1), 32–38.

36.

Tambag

Can

(2014). Evaluation of the NANDA nursing diagnoses level of determining in nursing students during applicatıon of the psychiatric nursing course. Yildirim Beyazit University Journal of Nursing, 2(3), 12–20.

37.

Tasdemir

Kizilkaya

(2013). Evaluation of NANDA nursing diagnoses of healthcare college final year students during the clinical application of the mental health and disease nursing course. Journal of Human Sciences, 10(1), 246–257.

38.

Yilmaz

F. T.

Sabanciogullari

Aldemir

(2015). The opinions of nursing students regarding the nursing process and their levels of proficiency in Turkey. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(4), 265–275.

39.

Veredas

F. J.

Ruiz-Bandera

Villa-Estrada

Rufino-Gonzalez

J. F.

Morente

(2014). A web-based e-learning application for wound diagnosis and treatment. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 116(3), 236–248.

40.

Wasim

Sharma

S. K.

Khan

I. A.

Siddiqui

(2014). Web based learning. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 5, 446–449.

41.

Wilkinson

J. M.

(2018). Pearson nursing diagnosis handbook. Ankara, Turkey: Pelikan Publishing.

42.

Yönt

G. H.

Khorshid

Eşer

İ.

(2009). Examination of nursing diagnoses used by nursing students and their opinions about nursing diagnoses. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 20(4), 162–168.

43.

Zaybak

Ozdemir

Gunay Islamoglu

(2016). Examining the difficulties experienced by nurses in the nursing process applications. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 19(4), 269–277.