International Collaboration and New Research Evidence on Nanda International Terminology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To discuss priorities and possibilities for promoting international collaboration and new research evidence on NANDA International, Inc. (NANDA-I).

METHODS

Theoretical reflection article based on the literature and the authors’ opinions on the subject matter, carried out by six research nurses.

CONCLUSIONS

International research collaboration for NANDA-I allows the improvement of research production in an actual clinical setting, especially with multicenter and validation studies, conducted by researchers from different countries. This provides for improved understanding of patients’ experiences and may help to produce robust scientific evidence.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING KNOWLEDGE

The generation of new evidence may lead to an increase in NANDA-I visibility and in nurses’ understanding of its meaning for clinical practice and for the formulation of diagnostic hypotheses.

Keywords

International cooperation nursing diagnoses theoretical models

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Almeida

M. A.

Lucena

A. F.

Franzen

Laurent

M. C.

(Eds.) (2011). Processo de enfermagem na prática clínica: estudos clínicos realizados no Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Artmed.

Avena

M. J.

Pedreira

M. d.

Alves

L. B. O.

Herdman

T. H.

Gutiérrez

M. G.

(2019). Frequency of respiratory nursing diagnoses and accuracy of clinical indicators in preterm infants. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 30(2), 73–80.

Azzolin

Mussi

C. M.

Ruschel

K. B.

Souza

E. N.

Lucena

A. F.

Rabelo-Silva

E. R.

(2013). Effectiveness of nursing interventions in heart failure patients in home care using NANDA-I, NIC, and NOC. Applied Nursing Research, 26(4), 239–244.

Caldeira

Timmins

Carvalho

E. C.

Vieira

(2017). Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis spiritual distress in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 28(1), 44–52.

Carvalho

E. C.

Cruz

D. A. L. M.

Herdman

T. H.

(2013). Contribution of standardized languages for knowledge production, clinical reasoning and clinical nursing practice. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 66(esp), 134–141.

Chaves

E. C. L.

Carvalho

E. C.

Rossi

L. A.

(2008). Validation of nursing diagnoses: Validated types, patterns and validated components. Revista Eletrônica de Enfermagem, 10(2), 13–520.

D'Agostino

Barbaranelli

Paans

Wolter

Belsito

Vela

R. J.

Alvaro

Vellone

(2017). Psychometric evaluation of the D-catch, an instrument to measure the accuracy of nursing documentation. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 28(3), 145–152.

Danski

M. T. R.

Oliveira

G. L. R.

Pedrolo

Lind

Johann

D. A.

(2017). Importance of evidence-based practice in nurse's work processes. Ciência, Cuidado e Saúde, 16(2), 1–6.

deSousa

G. S.

Perrelli

deOliveira Mangueira

deOliveira Lopes

M. V.

Sougey

E. B.

(2020). Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis risk for suicide in the older adults. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 34(2), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2020.01.003

10.

Dias Emidio

S. C.

Moorhead

Oliveira

H. C.

Herdman

T. H.

Oliveira-Kumakura

A. R.

Carmona

E. V.

(2020). Validation of nursing outcomes related to breastfeeding establishment. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12256

11.

Ferreira

A. M.

Predebon

C. M.

Cruz

Rabelo

E. R.

(2011). Clinical validation of nursing diagnoses of acute pain in hospitalized children. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, 22(4), 162–169.

12.

Gallani

M. C.

(2016). International collaboration in the nursing agenda in the coming decades. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 24, e2739.

13.

Grant

Kinney

M. R.

(1992). Using the Delphi technique to examine the content validity of nursing diagnoses. Nursing Diagnosis, 3(1), 12–22.

14.

Herdman

T. H.

Kamitsuru

(Eds.) (2017). NANDA International nursing diagnoses: Definitions and classification, 2018–2020. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers.

15.

Hoeck

Delmar

(2018). Theoretical development in the context of nursing: The hidden epistemology of nursing theory. Nursing Philosophy, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12196.

16.

Larson

E. L.

Cohen

Liu

Zachariah

Yao

Shang

(2017). Assessing intensity of nursing care needs using electronically available data. Computers, Informatics, Nursing: CIN, 35(12), 617–623. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000375

17.

Linch

Rabelo-Silva

Keenan

Moraes

Stifter

Müller-Staub

(2014). Validation of the quality of diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes (Q-DIO) instrument for use in Brazil and the United States. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 26(1), 19–25.

18.

Lopes

M. V. O.

Silva

V. M.

Araujo

T. L.

(2013). Validation of nursing diagnosis: challenges and alternatives. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 66(5), 649–655.

19.

McLane

A. M.

(1987). Measurement and validation of diagnostic concepts: A decade of progress. Heart Lung, 16(6), 616–624.

20.

Melo

M. D. M.

Queiroz

C. G.

Freitas

L. S.

Silva

I. P. da

Xavier

S. S. M.

Costa

I. K. F.

(2019). Situational low self-esteem nursing diagnosis in people with an ostomy: a diagnostic accuracy study. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 53, e03514. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-220X2018005003514

21.

Miguel

Caldeira

Vieira

(2018). The adequacy of the Q Methodology for clinical validation of nursing diagnoses related to subjective foci. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 29(2), 97–103.

22.

Müller-Staub

(2009). Evaluation of the implementation of nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, 20(1), 9–15.

23.

Müller-Staub

Lavin

M. A.

Needham

vanAchterberg

(2007). Meeting the criteria of a nursing diagnosis classification: Evaluation of ICNP, ICF, NANDA and ZEFP. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(5), 702–13.

24.

Nanda International, Inc. (2018). Bylaws of NANDA International, Inc. http://www.nanda.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Bylaws-Revision_Final_06.07.18.pdf

25.

Paganin

Rabelo

E. R.

(2012). A clinical validation study of impaired hhysical mobility of patients submitted to cardiac catheterization. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 23(3), 159–162.

26.

Pascoal

L. M.

Lopes

M. V.

Silva

V. M.

Beltrão

B. A.

Chaves

D. B.

Santiago

J. M.

Herdman

T. H.

(2014). Ineffective breathing pattern: defining characteristics in children with acute respiratory infection. International journal of nursing knowledge, 25(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2047-3095.2013.01249.x

27.

Park

(2014). Core NANDA-I, NIC, NOC for heart failure. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 25(1), 30–38.

28.

Pereira

J. M. V.

Cavalcanti

A. C. D.

Lopes

M. V. O.

Silva

V. G.

Souza

R. O.

Gonçalves

L. C.

(2015). Accuracy in inference of nursing diagnoses in heart failure patients. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 68(3), 690–696. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167.2015680417i

29.

Pesut

D. J.

Herman

(1998). OPT: transformation of nursing process for contemporary practice. Nursing outlook, 46(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-6554(98)90022-7

30.

Rocha

S. R.

Santos

M. C. L.

Lopes

M. V. O.

Rodrigues

A. B.

Sousa

V. E. C.

Aquino

C. B. Q.

Mendes

C. R. S.

(2018). Accuracy of the defining characteristics of the nursing diagnosis for fatigue in women undergoing radiotherapy. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 71(Suppl. 3), 1445–1452. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0549

31.

Peres

H. H.

Jensen

Martins

T. Y.

(2016). Assessment of diagnostic accuracy in nursing: paper versus decision support system. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 29(2), 218–224.

32.

Rabelo-Silva

E. R.

Cavalcanti

A. C. D.

Caldas

M. C. R. G.

Lucena

A. F.

Almeida

M. A.

Linch

G. F.

Silva

M. B.

Müller-Staub

(2017). Advanced nursing process quality: Comparing the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) with the NANDA International (NANDA-I) and Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(3-4), 379–387.

33.

Saranto

Kinnunen

U. M.

Kivekäs

Lappalainen

A. M.

Liljamo

Rajalahti

Hyppönen

(2014). Impacts of structuring nursing records: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 28(4), 629–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12094.

34.

Sigma Theta Tau International (2003). Guidelines for International Collaborative Research. International Research Committee. https://www.nursingsociety.org/docs/default-source/research-documents/guidelines_icr.pdf?sfvrsn=0

35.

Silva

R. A. R.

Costa

M. M. N.

Souza Neto

V. L.

Silva

B. C. O.

Costa

C. S.

Andrade

I. F. C.

(2017). Noncompliance in people living with HIV: accuracy of defining characteristics of the nursing diagnosis. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 25, e2940.

36.

Tastan

Linch

G. C.

Keenan

G. M.

Stifter

McKinney

Fahey

Lopez

K. D.

Yao

Wilkie

D. J.

(2014). Evidence for the existing American Nurses Association-recognized standardized nursing terminologies: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(8), 1160–70.

37.

Törnvall

Jansson

(2017). Preliminary evidence for the usefulness of standardized nursing terminologies in different fields of application: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 28(2), 109–119.