Psychometric properties of unemployment syndrome scale and relevance to clinical practice

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly completed unemployment syndrome scale (USS).

Method

Using a cross-sectional descriptive design, 319 long-term unemployed people completed a questionnaire.

Findings

Internal consistency reliability was supported by Cronbach's α value of .912 for the total scale. To assess the construct validity of the USS, we examined convergent validity, known-groups validity, and exploratory factor analysis. We also assessed convergent validity by examining the relationship between the USS and five other related and known concepts. The Exploratory Factor Analysis performed on the USS extracted three factors with Eigen values >1 (Kaiser's Criterion), which explained the variability of 55.16%. As hypothesized, all correlations were moderate. On the other hand, regarding known-groups validity, the hypotheses were validated.

Conclusions

This evidence of the reliability and validity of USS supports its use in research and clinical practice to evaluate the impact of long-term unemployment and its treatment.

Relevance to clinical practice

The USS is a Spanish clinical tool for the assessment of patients with unemployment syndrome symptoms and integral needs care by nursing professionals.

Keywords

Nursing diagnosis patient-centered care public health nursing questionnaire

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Artazcoz

Benach

Borrell

Cortes

(2004). Unemployment and mental health: Understanding the interactions among gender, family roles, and social class. American Journal of Public Health, 94(1), 82–88.

Benach

Muntaner

Solar

Santana

Quinlan

(2011). Empleo, trabajo y desigualdades en salud: Una visión global. Barcelona, Spain: Icaria Editorial.

Blanchflower

D. G.

Bryson

(2020). Unemployment disrupts sleep (No. w27814). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Bocchino

Lepiani Diaz

Medialdea

M. J.

Gilart Cantizano

Dueñas Rodríguez

(2020). Development of a scale to measure an unemployment syndrome: Items generation and content validity. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 31(3), 210–217.

Bocchino

Medialdea

M. J.

Lepiani

Mejías

Dueñas

(2017). The nursing diagnosis development of unemployment disorder: Content validation with nursing experts. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 28(4), 184–191.

Bordea

E. N.

Pellegrini

(2014). The evaluation of the level of stress, anxiety and depression for the unemployed persons. International Journal of Academic Research, 6(1), 325–332.

Carver

C. S.

(1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol'too long: Consider the brief cope. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 92–100.

Diener

E. D.

Emmons

R. A.

Larsen

R. J.

Griffin

(1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.

Evans-Lacko

Knapp

McCrone

Thornicroft

Mojtabai

(2013). The mental health consequences of the recession: Economic hardship and employment of people with mental health problems in 27 European countries. PloS One, 8(7), e69792.

10.

Galatzer-Levy

I. R.

Bonanno

G. A.

Mancini

A. D.

(2010). From marianthal to latent growth mixture modeling: A return to the exploration of individual differences in response to unemployment. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 3(2), 116–125.

11.

J. F.

Longnecker

(2010). Doctor-patient communication: A review. Ochsner Journal, 10(1), 38–43.

12.

Joliffe

I. T.

(1996). Principal components analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

13.

Kroenke

Spitzer

R. L.

Williams

J. B.

(2002). The PHQ-15: Validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64, 258–266.

14.

Lovibond

P. F.

Lovibond

S. H.

(1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3), 335–343.

15.

Luhmann

Eid

(2009). Does it really feel the same? Changes in life satisfaction following repeated life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 363–381.

16.

McDowell

(2006). Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires (3rd ed.). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

17.

McKee-Ryan

Song

Wanberg

C. R.

Kinicki

A. J.

(2005). Psychological and physical well-being during unemployment: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 53.

18.

Mossakowski

K. N.

(2009). The influence of past unemployment duration on symptoms of depression among young women and men in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 99(10), 1826–1832.

19.

Nunnally

J. C.

(1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

20.

Nunnally

J. C.

Bernstein

(1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.

21.

Paul

K. I.

Moser

(2009). Unemployment impairs mental health: Meta-analyses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 264–282.

22.

Rosenberg

(1965). Society and adolescent self image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

23.

Sanz

A. D.

Fradua

I. A.

Cabrera

M. S.

(2017). Coping with the impact of long-term unemployment in Bizkaia: Reports of Uncertainty and Insecurity (pp. 125–139). Zerbitzuan: Gizarte zerbitzuetarako aldizkaria = Social Services Magazine.

24.

Schalock

R. L.

Verdugo

M. A.

(2002). Handbook on quality of life for human service practitioners. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.

25.

Spector

P. E.

(2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221–232.

26.

Starace

Mungai

Sarti

Addabbo

(2017). Self-reported unemployment status and recession: An analysis on the Italian population with and without mental health problems. PLoS One, 12(4): e0174135.

27.

Tinsley

H. E. A.

Tinsley

D. J.

(1987). Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 414–424.

28.

Turner

G. M.

Litchfield

Finnikin

Aiyegbusi

O. L.

Calvert

(2020). General practitioners’ views on use of patient reported outcome measures in primary care: A cross-sectional survey and qualitative study. BMC Family Practice, 21(1), 14.

29.

Waters

L. E.

Moore

K. A.

(2002). Self-esteem, appraisal and coping: A comparison of unemployed and re-employed people. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(5), 593–604.