A retrospective descriptive study of NANDA-I nursing diagnoses used by midwives working in obstetrics and gynecologic service: An example from south-eastern Turkey

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to identify NANDA-I nursing diagnoses that midwives working in obstetrics and gynecologic service use while managing the electronic nursing care process.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted in a descriptive way to evaluate electronic care plan records of 3025 patients staying in obstetrics and gynecologic service between April 1, 2020. and April 1, 2021. Diagnoses in the records of the electronic care process were digitalized by two faculty members. Then, NANDA-I nursing diagnoses used by midwives were identified. NANDA-I nursing diagnoses used by midwives were identified.

Findings

It was determined that diagnoses in care plans documented from the system within the 1-year period fell into eight domains and 10 classes, and 5819 diagnoses were given in total. The most frequent diagnoses given in obstetrics and gynecologic service were “acute pain” and “risk for bleeding.”

Conclusion

Findings of this study revealed that nursing care records in obstetrics and gynecologic service did not have a large number of diagnoses and interventions.

Implications for nursing practice

Care plans directly reflect the contribution of the care to the patient. Consequently, midwives being aware of and recording nursing diagnoses while giving care will ensure a standardized language and visibility in care. More coverage of midwifery-related diagnoses in the midwifery curriculum will make NANDA-I nursing diagnoses more visible in midwifery as well.

Keywords

electronic health records midwifery midwifery record nursing diagnoses standardized midwifery language

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akın

Türkçelik

(2018). Sağlık Hizmetlerine Erişimde Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitliği Haritalama ve İzleme Çalışması. CEİD Yayınları. http://www.ceidizleme.org/medya/dosya/93.pdf

Alvarenga

S. C.

Castro

D. S.

Leite

F. M. C.

Garcia

T. R.

Brandão

M. A. G.

Primo

C. C.

(2018). Critical defining characteristics for nursing diagnosis about ineffective breastfeeding. Revista Brasileira de Enfermage, 71(2), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0549

Aksoy Derya

Pasinlioğlu

(2015). The effect of nursing care based on comfort theory on women's postpartum comfort levels after caesarean sections. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 28(3), 138–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12122

Apolônio

F. R.

Pontes

C. M.

Perrelli

J. G. A.

Sousa

S. M. A.

Mendes

R. C. M. G.

Mangueira

S. O.

Linhares

F. M. P.

(2021). Content validity of the nursing diagnosis powerlessness in women during natural childbirth. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 55, e20210198. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2021-0198

Aseratie

Murugan

Molla

(2014). Assessment of factors affecting implementation of nursing process among nurses in selected governmental hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Cross sectional study. Journal of Nursing Care, 3(3), 170. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1168.1000170

Ayerle

G. M.

Eggenschwiler

L. C.

Linhart

Cignacco Müller

(2019). Hebammendiagnosen: Der Hebammenarbeit eine Sprache verleihen. Zeitschrift für Hebammenwissenschaft, 7(2), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.9989

Betran

A. P.

Torloni

M. R.

Zhang

J. J.

Gülmezoglu

A. M.

WHO Working Group on Caesarean Section . (2016). WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 123(5), 667–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13526

Birol

(2011). Hemşirelik Süreci. (10.Baskı) Etki Yayınları (pp. 133–156). Etki Matbaacılık Yayıncılık.

Bubeníková

Š.

Procházka

(2015). Validation of diagnostic elements of the nursing diagnosis 00132 Acute Pain in Midwifery. Profese Online, 8(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5507/pol.2015.008

10.

Bulechek

G. M.

Butcher

H. K.

Dochterman

J. M.

Wagner

C. M.

(2010). Classificação Das Intervenções De Enfermagem (NIC) (5 edn.). Elsevier.

11.

Carteiro

Caldeira

Sousa

Costa

Mendes

(2017). Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis of sexual dysfunction in pregnant women. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 28(4), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12139

12.

Carvalho

O. M. C.

Silva

K. R.

Andrade

L. Z. C.

Silva

V. M. D.

Lopes

M. V. D. O.

(2014). Prevalence of nursing diagnoses of breastfeeding in the mother-infant dyad in basic health unit. Rev Rene, 15(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.2014000100013

13.

Chang

Y. Y.

Chao

L. F.

Xiao

Chien

N. H.

(2021). Effects of a simulation-based nursing process educational program: a mixed-methods study. Nurse Education in Practice, 56, 103188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103188

14.

Clark

Lang

(1992). Nursing's next advance: An internal classification for nursing practice. International Nursing Review, 39(4), 109–128.

15.

D'Agostino

Pancani

Romero-Sánchez

J. M.

Lumillo-Gutierrez

Paloma-Castro

Vellone

Alvaro

(2018). Nurses' beliefs about nursing diagnosis: A study with cluster analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(6), 1359–1370. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13545

16.

Erer

M. T.

Akbaş

Yıldırım

(2017). Hemşirelik Sürecinin Evrimsel Gelişimi Hemşirelik Süreci. Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Lokman Hekim Tıp Tarihi ve Folklorik Tıp Dergisi, 7(1), 1–5. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/mutftd/issue/43189/523856

17.

Fonseca

S. S. O.

Gerk

M. A. S.

Loureiro

M. D. R.

Nunes

C. B.

Ivo

M. L.

Justino

L. C. L.

Campos de Azevedo

Ferreira Júnior

M. A.

(2016). Nursing diagnosis of mothers and roomed-in newborns. International Archives of Medicine, 9(291), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3823/2162

18.

Georg

Cignacco

(2006). Hebammendiagnosen und deren Bedeutung für die Professionalisierung des Hebammenberufes. Hebammenarbeit. Assessment, Diagnosen und Interventionen bei (patho) physiologischen und psychosozialen Phänomenen (pp. 255–281), Hogrefe AG.

19.

Hariyati

R. T. S.

Hamid

A. Y.

Eryando

Hasibuan

Z. A.

(2020). Usability and satisfaction of using electronic nursing documentation, lesson-learned from new system implementation at a hospital in Indonesia. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 13(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434602014010300

20.

Herdman

T. H.

Kamitsuru

Lopes

C. T.

(2021). NANDA International Diagnosis Nursing: Definitions and classification (12th ed., pp. 2021–2023). Thieme.

21.

Jansen

A. J.

vanRhenen

D. J.

Steegers

E. A.

Duvekot

J. J.

(2005). Postpartum hemorrhage and transfusion of blood and blood components. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, 60(10), 663–671. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000180909.31293.cf

22.

Jensen

deAlmeida Lopes Monteiro da Cruz

Gomes

L. C.

Jr Lopes

M. H.

(2013). Attributing fuzzy values to nursing diagnoses and their elements: The specialists' opinion. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 24(3), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2047-3095.2013.01242.x

23.

Korhan

E. A.

Hakverdioğlu

Demiray

Akça

Eker

(2015). Yoğun Bakım Ünitesinde Hemşirelik Tanılarının Belirlenmesi ve NANDA Tanılarına Göre Değerlendirilmesi. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(1), 16–21. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/duzcesbed/issue/4848/66641

24.

Mazoni

S. R.

deCarvalho

E. C.

dosSantos

C. B.

(2013). Clinical Validation of the Nursing Diagnosis Labor Pain. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 21, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-11692013000700012

25.

Medeiros

A. L.

Santos

S. R.

Cabral

R. W.

Silva

J. P.

Nascimento

N. M.

(2016). Assessing nursing diagnoses and interventions in labour and high-risk pregnancies. Avaliando Diagnósticos E Intervenções De Enfermagem No Trabalho De Parto E Na Gestação De Risco. Revista Gaucha de Enfermagem, 37(3), e55316. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2016.03.55316

26.

Melo

N. P.

Souza

J. M.

Cordeiro

S. M.

Veríssimo

M. Ó. R.

(2022). Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis “risk for delayed child development”. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 56, e20220229. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0229en

27.

Menard

M. K.

Main

E. K.

Currigan

S. M.

(2014). Executive summary of the reVITALize initiative: Standardizing obstetric data definitions. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 124(1), 150–153. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000322

28.

Mendes

R. C. M. G.

Frazão

C. M. F. Q.

Lacerda

A. C. T.

Lopes

M. V. O.

Linhares

F. M. P.

Mangueira

S. O.

(2021). Content validation of the nursing diagnosis risk for disturbed maternal-fetal dyad. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 55, e03689. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2019041403689

29.

Moura

E. R. F.

Valente

M. M. Q. P.

Lopes

M. V. D. O.

Damaseno

A. K. D. C.

Evangelista

D. R.

(2012). Prevalence of the nursing diagnosis, imbalanced nutrition: more than body requirements, in pregnant women. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 25, 560–566. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-21002012000400013

30.

Neves

R. S.

Araújo

P. H. M.

Lacerda

T. C. L.

(2014). Diagnósticos De Enfermagem Prevalentes No Bloco Materno-Infantil de um Hospital Público de Brasília. Enfermagem Em Foco, 5(3/4), 53–56. https://doi.org/10.21675/2357-707X.2014.v5.n3/4.560

31.

Park

J. E.

Chung

K. A.

Cho

Kim

H. S.

(2013). Construction of the nursing diagnosis ontology in obstetric and gynecologic nursing unit using nursing process and SNOMED CT. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing, 19(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2013.19.1.1

32.

Perry

Potter

(2014). Canadian fundamentals of nursing (5th edn.). Elsevier.

33.

Poorolajal

Alafchi

Najafi Vosoogh

Hamzeh

Ghahramani

(2014). Risk factors for maternal mortality in the west of Iran: A nested case-control study. Epidemiology and Health, 36, e2014028. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih/e2014028

34.

Ribeiro da Silva

deOliveira Silva

Andrade Teles Monteiro

N. M.

Matos Santana

Santos Rocha

Ramos da Cruz Almeida

T. H.

(2018). Diagnoses, results, and nursing interventions in C-sections. Journal of Nursing UFPE/Revista de Enfermagem UFPE, 12(12), 3221–3230. http://doi.org/10.5205/19818963-v12i12a237549p3221-3230-2018

35.

Vieira

Bachion

M. M.

Salge

A. K. M.

Munari

D. B.

(2010). Diag-Nósticos de Enfermagem da NANDA No Período Pós-parto Imediato E Tardio. Escola Anna Nery, 14(1), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-81452010000100013

36.

World Health Organization Human Reproduction Programme . (2015). WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Reproductive Health Matters, 23(45), 149–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhm.2015.07.007

37.

Yang

M. J.

Kim

H. Y.

Kim

H. K.

(2019). Identification of nursing diagnosis-outcome-intervention linkages for inpatients in the obstetrics department nursing unit in South Korea. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 30(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12187

38.

Zuchatti

B. V.

Ferreira

R. C.

Ribeiro

Duran

E. C. M.

(2022). Clinical validation of nursing diagnosis fatigue (00093) in women in the immediate hospital postpartum period. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 56, e20210530. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2021-0530en