BemS.L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
2.
CrawfordM.MarecekJ. (1989). Psychology reconstructs the female. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 147–166.
3.
DeauxK. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist, 39, 105–116.
4.
DeauxK.MajorB. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389.
5.
EaglyA.H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
EichlerM. (1980). The double standard: A feminist critique of feminist social science. New York: St. Martin's Press.
7.
GaileyC.W. (1987). Evolutionary perspectives on gender hierarchy. InHessB.B.FerreeM.M., (Eds.), Analyzing gender: A handbook of social science research (pp. 32–67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Hare-MustinR.T.MarecekJ. (Eds.). (1990). Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
HerdtG.H.DavidsonJ. (1988). The Sambra “Turnim-man”: Sociocultural and clinical aspects of gender formation in male pseudohermaphrodites with 5 alpha-reductase deficiency in Papua New Guinea. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 17, 33–56.
10.
KesslerS.J. (1990). The medical construction of gender: Case management of intersexed infants. Signs, 16, 3–26.
11.
LottB. (1981). A feminist critique of androgyny: Toward the elimination of gender attributions for learned behavior. InMayoC.HenleyN.M., (Eds.), Gender and nonverbal behavior (pp. 171–180). New York: Springer-Verlag.
12.
MoneyJ. (1987). Propaedeutics of diecious G-I/R: Theoretical foundations for understanding dimorphic gender-identity/role. InReinischJ.M.RosenblumL.A.SandersS.S., (Eds.), Masculinity/femininity: Basic perspectives (pp. 13–28). New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
O'LearyV.E.UngerR.K.WallstonB.S. (Eds.). (1985). Women, gender, and social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
RaymondJ. (1979). The transsexual empire: The making of the she-male. Boston: Beacon Press.
15.
RussettD.N. (1989). Sexual science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
ScottJ.W. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. American Historical Review, 91, 1053–1075.
17.
SherifC.W. (1982). Needed concepts in the study of gender identity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 6, 375–398.
18.
ShieldsS.A. (1975). Functionalism, Darwinism, and the psychology of women: A study in social myth. American Psychologist, 30, 739–754.
19.
TobachE. (1971). Some evolutionary aspects of human gender. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 41, 710–715.
20.
UngerR.K. (1979). Toward a redefinition of sex and gender. American Psychologist, 34, 1085–1094.
21.
UngerR.K. (1983). Through the looking glass: No Wonderland yet! (The reciprocal relationship between methodology and models of reality). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8, 9–32.
22.
UngerR.K. (1992). Will the real sex difference please stand up?Feminism & Psychology, 2, 231–238.
23.
UngerR.K. (in press). Alternative conceptions of sex (and sex differences). InHaugM.WhalenR.AronC.OlsenK.L., (Eds.), The development of sex differences and similarities in behavior. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
24.
UngerR.K.CrawfordM. (1992). Women and gender: A feminist psychology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
WeissteinN. (1968). Kinder, Kirche, Kuche as scientific law: Psychology constructs the female. Boston: New England Free Press.
27.
WhitleyB.E.Jr. (1983). Sex role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 765–785.