We describe the DNA collection processes of an initial pilot and full study, which is designed to investigate joint peer and genetic effects on health behaviors and attitudes in a college campus setting. In the main study, 2664 (79.5%) students completed a Web survey and 2080 (78.7% of the survey completers after adjusting for the ineligible) provided a saliva DNA sample. The response rate for completing both the survey and the DNA portion of the study is 62.5%. Our DNA yields are of high quality. Overall, our experiences and results demonstrate that genetic data can be successfully collected as a part of traditional social science survey research projects. To aid others in doing so, we provide extensive details of our data collection experiences and offer recommendations to future researchers seeking to do or evaluate similar work.
References
1.
AhituvN.KavaslarN.SchackwitzW.UstaszewskaA.CollierJ. M.HebertS. et.al. 2006. “A PYY Q62P variant Linked to Human Obesity.”Human Molecular Genetics15:387–91.
2.
BhattiP.SigurdsonA. J.WangS. S.ChenJ. B.RothmanN.HartgeP. et.al. 2005. “Genetic Variation and Willingness to Participate in Epidemiologic Research: Data from Three Studies.”Cancer, Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention14:2449–53.
3.
BoisjolyJ.DuncanG. J.KremerM.LevyD. M.EcclesJ.2006. “Empathy or Antipathy? The Impact of Diversity.”American Economic Review96:1890–905.
4.
Committee on Population. 2001. Cells and Surveys: Should Biological Measures be Includedin Social Science Research?Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5.
CriderK. S.ReefhuisJ.WoomertA.HoneinM. A.2006. “Racial and Ethnic Disparity in Participation in DNA Collection at the Atlanta Site of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.”American Journal of Epidemiology164:805–12.
6.
DuncanG. J.BoisjolyJ.KremerM.LevyD. M.EcclesJ.2005. “Peer Effects in Drug Use and Sex Among College Students.”Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology33:375–85.
7.
FraylingT. M.TimpsonN. J.WeedonM. NZegginiE.FreathyR. M.LindgrenC. M. et.al. 2007. “A Common Variant in the FTO Gene is Associated with Body Mass Index and Predisposes to Childhood and Adult Obesity.”Science316:889–94.
8.
FreemanB.PowellJ.BallD.HillL.CraigI.PlominR.1997. “DNA by Mail: An Inexpensive and Noninvasive Method for Collecting DNA Samples from Widely Dispersed Populations.”Behavior Genetics27:251–57.
9.
FreemanB.SmithN.CurtisC.HuckettL.MillJ.CraigI.2003. “DNA from Buccal Swabs Recruited by Mail: Evaluation of Storage Effects on Long-Term Stability and Suitability for Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Genotyping.”Behavior Genetics33:67–72.
10.
GuoG.RoettgerE. M.CaiT.2008. “The Integration of Genetic Propensities into Social Control Models of Delinquency and Violence Among Male Youths.”American Sociological Review73:543–68.
11.
HalbertC. H.GandyO. H.CollierA.ShakerL.2006. “Intentions to Participate in Genetics Research Among African American Smokers.”Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention15:150–53.
12.
HansenT. V. O.SimonsenM. K.NielsenF. C.HundrupY. A.2007. “Collection of Blood, Saliva, and Buccal Cell Samples in a Pilot Study on the Danish Nurse Cohort: Comparison of the Response Rate and Quality of Genomic DNA.”Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention16:2072–76.
13.
HarrisK. M.FloreyF.TaborJ.BearmanP. S.JonesJ.UdryJ. R.2003. “The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health: Research Design,”vol. 2005. Retrieved February 26, 2008 (http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design).
14.
HernandezL. M.BlazerD. G., eds. 2006. Genes, Behavior, and the Social Environment: Moving Beyond the Nature/Nurture.Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
15.
HodgkinsonC. A.XuK.YuanQ.ShenP. H.HeinzE.LobosE. A. et.al. 2008. “Addictions Biology: Haplotype-Based Analysis for 130 Candidate Genes on a Single Array.”, Alcohol and Alcoholism43(5):505–15.
16.
HuntK. A.ZhernakovaA.TurnerG.HeapG. A. R.FrankeL.BruinenbergM. et.al. 2008. “Newly Identified Genetic Risk Variants for Celiac Disease Related to the Immune Response.”Nature Genetics40:395–402.
17.
KevlesDaniel1985. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity.New York: Knopf.
18.
McCreadyM. E.GrimseyA.StyerT.NikkeiS. M.BulmanD. E.2005. “A Century Later Farabee Has His Mutation.”Human Genetics117:285–87.
19.
MeulenbeltI.DroogS.TrommelenG. J. M.BoomsmaD. I.SlagboomP. E.1995. “High-Yield Noninvasive Human Genomic DNA Isolation Method for Genetic-Studies in Geographically Dispersed Families and Populations.”American Journal of Human Genetics57:1252–54.
20.
MoormanP. G.SkinnerC. S.EvansJ. P.NewmanB.SorensonJ. R.CalingaertB. et.al. 2004. “Racial Differences in Enrolment in a Cancer Genetics Registry.”Cancer, Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention13:1349–54.
21.
PhilibertR. A.ZadorozhnyayaO.BeachS. R. H.BrodyG. H.2008. “Comparison of the Genotyping Results Using DNA Obtained from Blood and Saliva.”Psychiatric Genetics18:275–81.
22.
ProctorRobert1988. Racial Hygiene: Medicine under the Nazis.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
ScottL. J.MohlkeK. L.BonnycastleL. L.WilierC. J.LiY.DurenW. L. et.al. 2007. “A Genome-wide Association Study of Type 2 Diabetes in Finns Detects Multiple Susceptibility Variants.”Science316:1341–45.
24.
SladekR.RocheleauG.RungJ.DinaC.ShenL.SerreD. et.al. 2007. “A Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Novel Risk Loci for Type 2 Diabetes.”Nature445:881–85.
25.
SteinthorsdottirV.ThorleifssonG.ReynisdottirI.BenediktssonR.JonsdottirT.WaltersG. B. et.al. 2007. “A Variant in CDKAL1 Influences Insulin Response and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes.”Nature Genetics39:770–75.
26.
TapperM.1999. In the Blood: Sickle Cell Anemia and the Politics of Race. Critical Histories.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
27.
ZegginiE.WeedonM. N.LindgrenC. M.FraylingT. M.ElliottK. S.LangoH. et.al. 2007. “Replication of Genome-wide Association Signals in UK Samples Reveals Risk Loci for Type 2 Diabetes.”Science316:1336–41.
