From the Depths of Despair: Performance,Counterperformance,and “September 11”

Abstract

After introducing a perspective on terrorism as postpolitical and after establishing the criteria for success that are immanent in this form of antipolitical action, this essay interprets September 11, 2001, and its aftermath inside a cultural-sociological perspective. After introducing a macro-model of social performance that combines structural and semiotic with pragmatic and power-oriented dimensions, I show how the terrorist attack on New York City and the counterattacks that immediately occurred in response can be viewed as an iteration of the performance/counterperformance dialectic that began decades, indeed centuries, ago in terms of the relation of Western expansion and Arab-Muslim reaction. I pay careful attention to the manner in which the counterperformance of New Yorkers and Americans develops an idealized, liminal alternative that inspired self-defense and outrage, leading to exactly the opposite performance results from those the al-Qaeda terrorists had intended.

References

Alexander

2001. “Was it Inevitable? Islam Through History.” Pp. 53–70 in How Did This Happen? Terrorism and the New War, edited by Hoge

J. F.

Jr. Rose

New York: Public Affairs.

Austin

J. L.

, 1957. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bakhtin

1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bennet

2003. “Hamas Leader Tells Muslims to Retaliate if U.S. Attacks,” New York Times February 8, p. 9.

Bernstein

2002. Out of the Blue: The Story of September 11, 2001, from Jihad to Ground Zero. New York: Times Books.

Black

2001. The History of Islamic Political Thought. New York: Routledge.

Crick

1962. In Defense of Politics. London, UK: Penguin Books.

Derrida

1978. “Force and Signification.” Pp. 3–30 in Writing and Difference, edited by Derrida

Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Edles

L. D.

1998. Symbol and Ritual in the New Spain: The Transition to Democracy after Franco. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Eyerman

Jameson

1991. Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

11.

Hanson

V. D.

2001. Carnage and Culture: Landmark Battles in the Rise of Western Power. New York: Doubleday.

12.

Hobsbawn

E. J.

1959. Social Bandits and Primitive Rebels. Glencoe: Free Press.

13.

Kepel

2002. Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

14.

Lapidus

I. M.

1987. “Islam and Modernity.” Pp. 65–88 in Patterns of Modernity, vol. 2, Beyond the West, edited by Eisenstadt

S. N.

London, UK: Francis Pinter.

15.

Lears

2003. “How a War Became a Crusade.” New York Times March 11, p. 25.

16.

Liebes

1992a. “Decoding TV News: The Political Discourse of Israeli Hawks and Doves.” Theory and Society 21:357–81.

17.

Liebes

1992b. “Our War/Their War: Comparing the Intifadeh and the Gulf War on U.S. and Israeli Television.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 9:44–55.

18.

Mirsepassi

2000. Intellectual Discourse and the Politics of Modernization: Negotiating Modernity in Iran. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Smith

H. N.

1950. Virgin Land: The American West as Symbol and Myth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

20.

Talbot

Chanda

, eds. 2002. The Age of Terror: America and the World after September 11. New York: Basic Books.

21.

Turner

1982. From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play. New York: PAJ Publications.

22.

Tyler

2003. “War Imminent as Hussein Rejects Ultimatum,” New York Times March 19, pp. 1, 9.

23.

Udovitch

A. L.

1987. “The Constitution of the Traditional Islamic Marketplace: Islamic Law and the Social Context of Exchange.” Pp. 150–71 in Patterns of Modernity, vol. 2, Beyond the West, edited by Eisentstadt

S. N.

London, UK: Francis Pinter.

24.

Weber

1978. Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

25.

Woodward

2002. Bush at War. New York: Simon.