This paper is a critical response to the newest version of the rational choice theory of religion (RCTR). In comparison with previous critiques, this paper takes aim at RCTR's foundational assumption of psychological egoism and argues that the thesis of psychological egoism is untenable. Without that thesis, the normative aspects of religious commitment cannot be reduced validly to instrumental reason. On neither conceptual nor empirical grounds therefore can religion or religious commitment be defined comprehensively in terms of exchange theory. With the failure of psychological egoism as a point of departure, the paper articulates an alternative theory of religion, one based on the epistemic rationality grounded in religious experience and religious emotion.
References
1.
AbellP.1992. “Is Rational Choice Theory a Rational Choice of Theory?” Pp. 183–206 in Rational Choice Theory: Advocacy and Critique, edited by ColemanJ. S.FararoT.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
AbrahamssonB.1970. “Homans on Exchange: Hedonism Revisited.”American Journal of Sociology76:273–85.
3.
AlexanderJ.1982. The Antinomies of Classical Thought: Marx and Durkheim.Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
AlstonW.1991. Perceiving God.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
5.
AmmermanN. T.1997. “Religious Choice and Religious Vitality: The Market and Beyond.” Pp. 119–32 in Rational Choice Theory and Religion, edited by YoungL. A.New York: Routledge.
6.
BarbaletJ. M.1998. Emotion, Social Theory, and Social Structure.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BergerP.1970. A Rumor of Angels.Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
8.
BergerP.1979. The Heretical Imperative: Contemporary Possibilities of Religious Affirmation.Garden City, NY: Anchor.
9.
BhaskarR.1994. Plato Etc.New York: Verso.
10.
BruceS.1999. Choice and Religion: A Critique of Rational Choice.Oxford: Oxford University Press. Calhoun, C. 1995. Critical Social Theory. New York: Blackwell.
11.
ChavesM.1995. “On the Rational Choice Approach to Religion.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion34:98–104.
12.
ColemanJ. S.1990. “Norm-Generating Structures.” Pp. 250–72 in The Limits of Rationality, edited by CookK. S.CookL. M.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
ColemanJ. S.FararoT. J.1992. Rational Choice Theory: Advocacy and Critique.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
DavidsonD.1973. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.”Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association20:5–20.
15.
DemerathN. J.1995. “Rational Paradigms, A-Rational Religion, and the Debate over Secularization.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion34:105–12.
16.
DreyfusH.1972. What Computers Can't Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence.New York: Harper and Row.
17.
DurkheimE.1951. Suicide.New York: Free Press.
18.
EliadeM. E.1957. The Sacred and the Profane.New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
19.
EllisonC.1995. “Rational Choice Explanations of Individual Religious Behavior: Notes on the Problem of Social Embeddedness.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion34:89–97.
20.
ElsterJ.1990. “When Rationality Fails.” Pp. 19–46 in The Limits of Rationality, edited by CookK. S.CookL. M.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
FeinbergJ.1971. “Psychological Egoism.” Pp. 489–99 in Reason and Responsibility, edited by FeinbergJ.Encino, CA: Dickenson Publishing Company.
22.
FrendW. H. C.1984. The Rise of Christianity.Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
23.
GiddensA.1976. New Rules of the Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies.New York: Basic.
24.
GreeleyA.1996. Religion as Poetry.New Brunswick: NJ: Transaction.
25.
HayD.MorisyA.1978. “Reports of Ecstatic, Paranormal, or Religious Experiences in Great Britain and the U.S.—A Comparison of Trends.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion17:255–68.
26.
HomansG. C.1961. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms.New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
27.
HullClark L.1943. Principles of Behavior: An Introduction to Behavior Theory.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
28.
IannacconeL. R.1995. “Voodoo Economics? Reviewing the Rational Choice Approach to Religion.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion34:76–88.
29.
JamesW.1961. The Varieties of Religious Experience.New York: Collier-MacMillan.
30.
KuhnT.1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
LakatosI.1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs.” Pp. 91–196 in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by LakatosI.MusgraveA.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
LaudanL.1977. Progress and Its Problems.Berkeley: University of California.
33.
MunchR.1992. “Rational Choice Theory: A Critical Assessment of Its Explanatory Power.” Pp. 137–60 in Rational Choice Theory: Advocacy and Critique, edited by ColemanJ. S.FararoT.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
NeitzM. J.PeterM.1997. “Economic Man and the Sociology of Religion.” Pp. 105–19 in Rational Choice Theory and Religion: Summary and Assessment, edited by YoungL.New York: Routledge.
35.
NeitzM. J.SpickardJ.1990. “Steps Toward a Sociology of Religious Experience: The Theories of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Alfred Schutz.”Sociological Analysis50:127–38.
36.
O'DeaT. F.1966. The Sociology of Religion.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37.
OttoR.1958. The Idea of the Holy.New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
PetersonA. L.1997. Martyrdom and the Politics of Religion.Albany: State University of New York Press.
39.
PorporaD.1987. The Concept of Social Structure.New York: Greenwood Press.
40.
PorporaD.1996. “Heroes, Religion, and Transcendental Metanarratives.”Sociological Forum11:209–30.
41.
PorporaD.2001. Landscapes of the Soul: the Loss of Moral Meaning in American Life.New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
ScheffT. J.1992. “Rationality and Emotion: Homage to Norbet Elias.” Pp. 101–19 in Rational Choice Theory: Advocacy and Critique, edited by ColemanJ. S.FararoT.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43.
SchleiermacherF.1994. On Religion: Speeches to Its Cultured Despisers.Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox Press.
44.
SchwartzB.1985. “Emerson, Cooley, and the American Heroic Vision.”Symbolic Interaction8: 103–20.
45.
SkinnerB. F.1969. Contingencies of Reinforcement.New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.
46.
SkinnerB. F.1971. Beyond Freedom and Dignity.New York: Vintage Books.
47.
SmithC.1996. Resisting Reagan: The U.S. Central America Peace Movement.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
SolomanR.1980. “Emotions and Choice.” Pp. 251–83 in Explaining Emotions, edited by RortyA. O.Berkeley: University of California Press.
49.
SpickardJ. V.1998. “Rethinking Religious Social Action: What Is ‘Rational’ about Rational Choice Theory?”Sociology of Religion59:99–115.
50.
StarkR.1996. The Rise of Christianity.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
StarkR.1997. “Bringing Theory Back In.” Pp. 3–24 in Rational Choice Theory and Religion: Summary and Assessment, edited by YoungL.New York: Routledge.
52.
StarkR.1999a. “Micro Foundations of Religion: A Revised Theory.”Sociological Theory17:264–89.
53.
StarkR.1999b. “A Theory of Revelations.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion38:287–308.
54.
StarkR.BainbridgeW. S.1987. A Theory of Religion.New York: Peter Lang.
55.
StarkR.FinkeR.2000. Acts of Faith: Explaining the Human Side of Religion.Berkeley: University of California Press.
56.
StroudB.1969. “Conventionalism and the Indeterminacy of Translation.” Pp. 82–96 in Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine, edited by DavidsonD.HintikkaJ.Dordrecht: Netherlands: Reidel.
57.
SwineburneR.1979. The Existence of God.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
58.
TaylorC.1964. The Explanation of Behavior.New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
59.
TaylorC.1992. Sources of the Self.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
TillichP.1957. The Dynamics of Faith.New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers.
61.
WilliamsR. H.2000. “Rational Choice Theory and Religion: Summary and Assessment.”Sociology of Religion61:105–06.
62.
YamaneD.1998. “Religious Experience.” Pp. 179–82 in The Encyclopedia of Religion and Society, edited by SwatosW.Jr.Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.
63.
YamaneD.PolzerM.1994. “Ways of Seeing Ecstasy in Modern Society: Experiential-Expressive and Cultural-Linguistic Views.”Sociological Analysis55:1–25.
64.
YoungL.1997. “Phenomenological Images of Religion and Rational Choice Theory.” Pp. 133–46 in Rational Choice Theory and Religion: Summary and Assessment, edited by YoungL.New York: Routledge.
