While many efforts to foster teacher leadership focus on the power, authority, and control that can come with teachers’ formal positions in organizational hierarchies, case studies of 4 teachers document how expertise, credibility, and influence can come together in teachers’ activities regardless of the formal positions they hold. These teachers’ expertise emerged from investigations of issues that were of concern to them in their own classrooms and schools. Through these investigations, they developed representations that both helped them to articulate their own ideas and facilitated the sharing of their work in a variety of different contexts. The connections these teachers made provided them with new perspectives, helped them to build their credibility, and enabled them to gain access to individuals who served as translators, advocates, and amplifiers for their work. Despite conditions that provided little support for—and often significant discouragement from—sharing their work and ideas, their experiences suggest some of the ways that schools, school systems, and reform networks can build on the ideas, energy, and influence of teachers both in the classroom and out.
References
1.
BoerstT. A. (2001). Problem solvers: Responses to the patterns in squares problems. Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(3), 169—172.
2.
BoerstT. A. (2003a, April). Perspective from a teacher-scholar. In T. Hatch (Chair), The journey of ideas: The dynamics of learning and leadership. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
3.
BoerstT. A. (2003b). 24′ x 30′: Professing teacher knowledge beyond the classroom walls. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9(9), 499—501.
4.
BoerstT. A., and SchielackJ. F. (2003). Computational fluency. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9(6), 292.
5.
CobbP., McClainK., LambergT. d. S., and DeanC. (2003). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13—24.
6.
Cochran-SmithM., and LytleS. (1999). The teacher research movement a decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15—25.
7.
ColeM. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
ConeJ. K. (1992). Untracking AP English: Creating opportunity is not enough. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(9), 712—717.
9.
ConeJ. K. (1993). The key to untracking: Learning to teach an untracked class. College Board Review, 169(Fall), 20—27.
10.
ConeJ. K. (1994). Appearing acts: Creating readers in a high school English class. Harvard Educational Review, 64(4), 450—473.
11.
ConeJ. K. (2002, May 26). The gap is in our expectations. Newsday, pp. B8.
12.
ConeJ. K. (2003). The construction of low achievement: A study of one detracked senior English class. Harvard Education Letter (May/June). Retrieved February 22, 2005, from http://www.edletter.org/past/issues/2003-mj/teacher.shtml
13.
CzarniawskaB., and SevonG. (1996). Translating organizational change. Berlin: de Gruyter.
14.
Darling-HammondL. (1992). Reframing accountability: Creating learner-centered schools. In and and LiebermanA. (Ed.), The changing contexts of teaching (91st yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, pp. 11—36). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
EisnerE. (1998). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
16.
ElmoreR., and BurneyD. (1997). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement in community school district #2, New York City. New York: National Commission on Teaching & America's Future.
17.
FayC. (1992). Empowerment through leadership: In the teachers’ voice. In and and LivingstonC. (Ed.), Teachers as leaders: Evolving roles (pp. 57—91). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
18.
FirestoneW. A., and BaderB. (1992). Redesigning teaching: Professionalism or bureaucracy?Albany: State University of New York Press.
19.
FreedmanS. W., SimonsE. R., KalninJ., and M-ClassTeams. (1999). Inside city schools: Investigating literacy in multicultural classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
20.
HatchT., Eiler WhiteM., and CapitelliS. (2003). From practice to practice: How teachers’ learning can advance knowledge, influence policy and improve performance. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
21.
HonigM. I., and HatchT. (2003, April). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
22.
HutchingsP., and ShulmanL. S. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change (September-October), 10—15.
23.
LiebermanA., and MillerL. (1999). Recreating leadership: Values, visions, and action. In LiebermanA., and MillerL. (Eds.), Teachers–Transforming their world and their work (pp. 39—58). New York: Teachers College Press.
24.
LiebermanA., and MillerL. (2001). Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters. New York: Teachers College Press.
25.
LittleJ. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teacher's professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509—536.
26.
LittleJ. W. (1999). Organizing schools for teacher learning. In Darling-HammondL., and SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession (pp. 233—262). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
LortieD. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
McLaughlinM., and TalbertJ. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
MishlerE. (1990). Validation in inquiry guided research: The role of exemplars. Harvard Educational Review, 60(4), 415—442.
30.
MooreR. (2002). Circles of influence: Use of dialogue circles in researching culturally engaged instruction. Palo Alto, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
31.
NietoS. (2003). What keeps teachers going?New York: Teachers College Press.
32.
NonakaI. (1994). A dynamic theory of knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5, 14—37.
33.
PowellW. W., and DiMaggioP. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
RichertA. E. (1999, April). The learning teacher and the changing school: Teacher research as a methodology for change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
35.
RosenholtzS. J. (1989). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools. White Plains, NY: Longman.
36.
RowanB. (1990). Commitment and control: Alternative strategies for the organizational design of schools. Review of Research in Education, 16, 359—389.
Seely BrownJ., and DuguidP. (2002). The social life of information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
39.
ShulmanL. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1—22.
40.
ShulmanL. S. (1993). Teaching as community property: Putting an end to pedagogical solitude. Change, 25(6), 6—7.
41.
SilvaD. Y., GimbertB., and NolanJ. (2000). Sliding the doors: Locking and unlocking possibilities for teacher leadership. Teachers College Record, 102(4), 779—804.
42.
SmylieM. A. (1994). Redesigning teachers’ work: Connections to the classroom. Review of Research in Education, 20, 129—177.
43.
SmylieM. A. (1995). New perspectives in teacher leadership. Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 3—7.
44.
SmylieM. A. (1996). From bureaucratic control to building human capital: The importance of teacher learning in education reform. Educational Researcher, 25(9), 9—11.
45.
SmylieM. A., and DennyJ. W. (1990). Teacher leadership: Tensions and ambiguities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(3), 235—259.
46.
SpillaneJ. P., HallettT., and DiamondJ. B. (2003). Forms of capital and the construction of leadership: Instructional leadership in urban elementary schools. Sociology of Education, 76(1), 1—17.
47.
SpillaneJ. P., HalversonR., and DiamondJ. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23—28.
48.
SupovitzJ. A., and KleinV. (2003). Mapping a course for improved student learning: How innovative schools systematically use student performance data to guide improvement. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
49.
WasleyP. (1991). Teachers who lead: The rhetoric of reform and the realities of everyday practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
50.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.
WigginsG., and McTigheJ. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
52.
WolkE. (1997, March). Progressive education in conservative times. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Conference, Chicago.
53.
WolkE. (1998, April). Diversifying the research team: The inclusion of students and community members. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Conference, San Diego, CA.
54.
WolkE. (2004, April). Getting the green light: The transformative power of participatory action-research with students as researchers. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Conference, San Diego, CA.
