Although a large body of research has investigated the possibility of motivational or attitudinal differences in women and men that would explain observable differences in levels of achievement, much of this research has failed to produce the expected results. It is proposed that the failure of researchers to consider the personal and contextual characteristics of their college student samples may have contributed to this lack of results. Some of the relevant variables include those provided by the (lack of) context of the typical laboratory experiment. Other context cues emerge from an analysis of the life stage of the typical research study participant. Predictions about achievement differences across the early adult years are outlined. This same life stage analysis is also briefly applied to other areas of gender research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AngristS. S.AlmquistE. (1975). Careers and contingencies: How college women juggle with gender. New York: Doubleday
2.
AtkinsonJ. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand
3.
BlumsteinP.SchwartzP. (1983). American couples: Money, work, sex. New York: Morrow
4.
BussD. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,54, 616–628
5.
BussD. M.BarnesM. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,50, 559–570
6.
CantorN.NoremJ. K.NiedenthalP. M.LangstonC. A.BrowerA. M. (1987). Life tasks, self-concept ideals, and cognitive strategies in a life transition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,53, 1178–1191
7.
CondreyJ.DyerS. (1976). Fear of success: Attribution of cause to the victim.Journal of Social Issues,32(3), 63–83
8.
DeauxK. (1972). To err is humanizing, but sex makes a difference.Representative Research in Social Psychology,3, 20–28
9.
DeauxK. (1988). Incipient identity. Carolyn Wood Sherif Award lecture presented at the American Psychological Association meetings, Atlanta
10.
DeauxK.MajorB. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior.Psychological Review,94, 369–389
11.
EaglyA. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
12.
EcclesJ. S. (1987). Gender roles and women's achievement-related decisions.Psychology of Women Quarterly,11, 135–172
13.
FalboT. (1990). Population policy in context: The case of Chinese children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston
14.
FriezeI. H. (1973). Studies of information processing and the attributional process in achievement-related contexts. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
15.
FriezeI. H. (1975). Women's expectations for and causal attributions of success and failure. In MednickM. T. S.TangriS. S.HoffmanL. W. (Eds.), Women and achievement: Social and motivational analyses (pp. 158–171). New York: Hemisphere
16.
FriezeI. H. (1979). Perceptions of battered wives. In FriezeI. H.Bar-TalD.CarrollJ. S. (Eds.), New approaches to social problems: Applications of attribution theory (pp. 79–108). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
17.
FriezeI. H.HanusaB. H.McHughM. C. (Eds.). (1982). Sex differences in causal attributions for success and failure: A current assessment.Sex Roles,8(4) (entire issue)
18.
FriezeI. H.ParsonsJ. E.JohnsonP. B.RubleD. N.ZellmanG. L. (1978). Women and sex roles: A social psychological perspective. New York: Norton
19.
FunderD. C. (1987). Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment.Psychological Bulletin,101, 75–90
20.
GutmannD. (1964). An exploration of ego configurations in middle and later life. In NeugartenB. L. (Ed.), Personality in middle and later life (pp. 114–148). New York: Atherton
21.
HendrickC.HendrickS. (1986). A theory and method of love.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,50, 392–402
22.
HiltonD. J. (1990). Conversational processes and causal explanation.Psychological Bulletin,107, 65–81
23.
HornerM. S. (1972). Toward an understanding of achievement-related conflicts in women.Journal of Social Issues,28(2), 157–175
24.
JayT. B. (1980). Sex roles and dirty word usage: A review of the literature and a reply to Haas.Psychological Bulletin,88, 614–621
25.
JenkinsS. R. (1987). Need for achievement and women's careers over 14 years: Evidence for occupational structure effects.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,53, 922–932
26.
KlassenA. D.WilliamsC. J.LevittE. E. (1989). Sex and morality in the U. S. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press
27.
Lipman-BlumenJ.LeavittH. J.PattersonK. J.BiesR. J.Handley-IsaksenA. (1980). A model of direct and relational achieving styles. In FryansL. J.Jr. (Ed.), Achievement motivation: Recent trends in theory and research (pp. 135–168). New York: Plenum
28.
MaccobyE. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account.American Psychologist,45, 513–520
29.
MayoC.HenleyN. M. (1981). Nonverbal behavior: Barrier or agent for social change. In MayoC.HenleyN. M. (Eds.), Gender and nonverbal behavior (pp. 3–13). New York: Springer-Verlag
30.
McClellandD. C.AtkinsonJ. W.ClarkR. A.LowellE. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts
31.
McHughM. C.FriezeI. H.HanusaB. H. (1982). Attributions and sex differences in achievement: Problems and new perspectives.Sex Roles,8, 467–479
32.
McHughM. C.KoeskeR. D.FriezeI. H. (1986). Issues to consider in conducting nonsexist research.American Psychologist,41, 879–890
33.
MurrellA. J.FriezeI. H.FrostJ. L. (1991). Aspiring to careers in male and female dominated professions: A study of black and white women.Psychology of Women Quarterly,15, 103–126
34.
NeugartenB. L. (Ed.). (1968). Middle age and aging. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
35.
O'ConnellA. N.RussoN. F. (Eds.). (1983). Models of achievement: Reflections of eminent women in psychology. New York: Columbia University Press
36.
OlsonJ. E.FriezeI. H.DetlefsenE. G. (1990). Having it all? Combining work and family in a male and a female profession.Sex Roles,23, 515–533
37.
PaludiM. A.Frankell-HauserJ. (1986). An idiographic approach to the study of women's achievement striving.Psychology of Women Quarterly,10, 89–100
38.
ParleeM. B. (1979). Psychology and women.Signs,5, 121–133
39.
PeplauL. A. (1983). Roles and gender. In KelleyH. H.BerscheidE.ChristensenA.HarveyJ. H.HustonT. L.LevingerG.McClintockE.PeplauL. A.PetersonD. R. (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 220–264). New York: Freeman
40.
PreseottS. (1978). Why researchers don't study women. The responses of 62 researchers.Sex Roles,4, 899–905
41.
RavenS.WeirA. (1981). Women of achievement. New York: Harmony Books
42.
RoseS.FriezeI. H. (1989). Young singles' scripts for a first date.Gender and Society,3, 258–268
43.
RossiA. S. (1980). Life-span theories and women's lives.Signs,6, 4–32
44.
RuggieroJ. A.WestonL. C. (1988). Work involvement among college-educated women: A methodological extension.Sex Roles,19, 491–506
45.
SalesE. (1978). Women's adult development. In FriezeI. H.ParsonsJ. E.JohnsonP. B.RubleD. N.ZellmanG. L. (Eds.), Women and sex roles: A social psychological perspective (pp. 157–190). New York: Norton
46.
SchultzD. P. (1969). The human subject in psychological research.Psychological Bulletin,72, 214–228
47.
SearsD. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51, 515–530
48.
SherifC. W. (1976). Orientation in social psychology. New York: Harper & Row
49.
SherifC. W. (1979). Bias in psychology. In ShermanJ. A.BeckE. T. (Eds.), The prism of sex: Essays in the sociology of knowledge (pp. 93–133). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press
50.
SherifC. W. (1980). Needed concepts in the study of gender identity. Presidential address to Division 35 (Psychology of Women) presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal
51.
SignorellaM. L.FriezeI. H. (1991). Context effects on gender schematic behavior. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh
52.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR. L. (1983). Achievement-related motives and behaviors. In SpenceJ. T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 10–74). San Francisco: Freeman
53.
SprecherS. (1989). The importance to males and females of physical attractiveness, earning potential, and expressiveness in initial attraction.Sex Roles,21, 591–607
54.
SteinA. H.BaileyM. M. (1973). The socialization of achievement orientation in females.Psychological Bulletin,80, 345–366
55.
StewartA. J.ChesterN. L. (1982). Sex differences in human social motives: Achievement, affiliation, and power. In StewartA. J. (Ed.), Motivation and society (pp. 172–218). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
56.
TaitM.PadgettM. Y.BaldwinT. T. (1989). Job and life satisfaction: A reevaluation of the strength of the relationship and gender effects as a function of the date of the study.Journal of Applied Psychology,74, 502–507
57.
UngerR. K. (1979). Female and male: Psychological perspectives. New York: Harper & Row
58.
ZirkelS.CantorN. (1990). Personal construal of life tasks: Those who struggle for independence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,58, 172–185
