Proprietorial Control in Family Firms: Some Functions of “Quasi-Organic” Management System

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the strategies of managerial control which are used by the proprietors of family-owned business enterprises. Interviews with the proprietors and senior managers of businesses in the building industry illustrate the “quasi-organic” nature of management structures. These grant some autonomy to senior managers without threatening proprietorial decision-making prerogatives. Although the family firm has certain distinctive features, similar control strategies designed to ensure that delegated decisions are “reliable” and “responsible” are evident in various types of business enterprise. There is, then, scope for further comparative research within a conceptual framework which does not entirely divorce the family firm from other business organizations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blau, P. M. “Decentralization in Bureaucracies.” In M. N. Zald (ed.), Power in Organizations. Nashville, Tenn.: Vanderbilt University Press, 1970.

Blau, P. M. , and Schoenherr, R. A. The Structure of Organizations. New York: Basic Books, 1971.

Bolton Committee . Small Firms—Report of the Committee of Inquiry on Small Firms. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1971.

Boswell, J. The Rise and Decline of Small Firms. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1973.

Burch, P. H. The Managerial Revolution Reassessed. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1972.

Burns, T , and Stalker, G. M. The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock, 1961.

Child, J. ‘Organizational Structure, Environment, and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice.”Sociology, 1972, 6 (1), 1–22.

Child, J. Organizations: A Guide to Problems and Practice. London: Harper & Row, 1977.

Curran, J. , and Stanworth, M.J.K. “Self-Selection and the Small Firm Worker: A Critique and an Alternative View.”Sociology, 1979, 13 (3), 437–444.

10.

Drucker, P. The Practice of Management. London: Heinemann, 1963.

11.

Edwards, R. Contested Terrain. London: Heinemann, 1979.

12.

Foster, C. Building with Men. London: Tavistock, 1969.

13.

Fox, A. Beyond Contract. London: Faber, 1974.

14.

Francis, A. ‘Families, Firms, and Finance Capital.”Sociology, 1980, 14 (1), 1–27.

15.

Hall, R. H. Organizations: Structure and Process. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1972.

16.

Handy, C. B. Understanding Organizations. (2nd ed.) Harmondsworth, England: Penguin, 1981.

17.

Humble, J. (ed.). Management by Objectives. London: McGraw-Hill, 1970.

18.

Moore, D. G. “Managerial Strategies.” In W. Warner and N. H. Martin (eds.), Industrial Man. New York: Harper, 1959.

19.

Nichols, T. Ownership, Control, and Ideology. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1969.

20.

Nyman, S. , and Silberston, A. “The Ownership and Control of Industry.”Oxford Economic Papers, 1978, 30 (1), 74–101.

21.

Perrow, C. Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay. Glenview, Ill: Scott, Foresman, 1972.

22.

Salaman, G. ‘An Historical Discontinuity: From Charisma to Routinization.”Human Relations, 1977, 30 (4), 373–388.

23.

Salaman, G. Work Organisations. London: Longman, 1979.

24.

Scase, R. , and Goffee, R. The Real World of the Small Business Owner. London: Croom Helm, 1980.

25.

Scase, R. , and Goffee, R. The Entrepreneurial Middle Class. London: Croom Helm, 1982.

26.

Stanworth, M.J.K. , and Curran, J. Management Motivation in the Smaller Business. Aldershot, England: Gower Press, 1973.

27.

Stanworth, M.J.K. , and Curran, J. “Growth and the Small Firm–An Alternative View.”Journal of Management Studies, 1976, 13 (2), 95–110.

28.

Tavistock Institute of Human Relations . Interdependence and Uncertainty: A Study of the Building Industry. London: Tavistock, 1976.