There is both an art and a science to nursing diagnosis. Art is a creative force, whereas science is a systematic force. Each is necessary for diagnosis development. This paper examines issues confronting nurse clinicians, educators, and scientists interested in continued efforts to generate and validate diagnoses. It concludes with suggestions of tasks necessary for sound diagnosis development.
BeaulieuJ.A. (1989). Nursing diagnoses co-occurring in adults with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. In Carroll-JohnsonR.M. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eighth conference (pp. 199–205). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
3.
GordonM.G.SweeneyM.A. (1979). Methodological problems and issues in identifying and standardizing nursing diagnoses. Advances in Nursing Science2 (1), 1–15.
4.
GoveP.B. (1981). Webster's third new international dictionary of the english language (Unabridged). Springfield, MA: Merriam.
5.
HinshawA.S. (1989). Keynote address: Nursing diagnosis: Forging the link between theory and practice. In Carroll-JohnsonR.M. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eighth conference (pp. 3–10). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
6.
HoskinsL.M. (1989). Clinical validation methodologies for nursing diagnosis research. In Carroll-JohnsonR.M. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eighth conference (pp. 126–131). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
7.
KinneyM.R.GuzzettaC.E. (1989). Testing a measuring technique to study nursing diagnosis. In Carroll-JohnsonR.M. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eighth conference (pp. 419–420). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
8.
LackeyN.R. (1989). Use of the object content test to derive defining characteristics of nursing diagnoses. In Carroll-JohnsonR.M. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eighth conference (pp. 421–424). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
9.
LangN.M.GebbieK. (1989). Nursing taxonomy: NANDA and ANA joint venture toward ICD-10CM. In Carroll-JohnsonR.M. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eighth conference (pp. 11–17). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
10.
MurphyC.P. (1989). Integration of diagnostic and ethical reasoning in clinical practice: Teaching and evaluation. In Carroll-JohnsonR.M. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eighth conference (pp. 73–76). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
TannerC.A.HughesA.G. (1984). Nursing diagnosis: Issues in clinical practice research. Topics in Clinical Nursing5 (4), 30–38.
13.
WalkerL.AvantK. (1988). Strategies for theory construction in nursing (2nd ed.). Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
14.
WebsterG.A. (1984). Nomenclature and classification system development. In KimM.J.McFarlaneA. M. (Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the fifth national conference (pp. 14–25). St. Louis: Mosby.
15.
YoungM.S.LucasC.M. (1984). Nursing diagnosis: Common problems in implementation. Topics in Clinical Nursing5 (4), 68–77.
