An analysis of the conceptualization embedded within the development of nursing diagnoses, including the historical perspective on this process, is presented. Although there are conceptual issues still to be resolved, nursing diagnosis can be considered as a conceptual approach to developing disciplinary knowledge.
American Nurse's Association (1980). Nursing: A social policy statement. Kansas city, MO: Author.
2.
EnglandM. (1989). Nursing diagnosis: A conceptual framework. In FitzpatrickJ.J.WhallA. L. (Eds.), Conceptual models of nursing: Analysis and evaluation, (2nd ed.). Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
3.
FitzpatrickJ.J. (1987) Etiology: Conceptual concerns, In McLaneA. (Ed.). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the seventh conference, (pp. 61–64). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
4.
FitzpatrickJ.J. (1988). How can we enhance nursing knowledge and practice. Nursing & Health Care, 9, 517–521.
5.
FitzpatrickJ.J.KerrM.E.SabaV.K.HoskinsL.M.HurleyM.E.MillsW.C.RottkampB.C.WarrenJ.J.CarpenitoL.J. (1989). Translating nursing diagnosis into ICD code. American Journal of Nursing, 89, 493–495.
6.
GebbieK.M. (1982). Toward the theory for nursing diagnosis classification. In KimM.J.MortizD. A. (Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the third and fourth national conferences, (pp. 8–18). New York: McGraw-Hill.
7.
GordonM. (1985). Nursing diagnosis. In WerleyH.H.FitzpatrickJ.J., (Eds.). Annual Review of Nursing Research. (Vol. 3) pp. 127–146. New York: Springer.
8.
GordonM. (1987). Nursing diagnosis: Process and application. (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
9.
KimM.J. (1989). Nursing diagnosis. In FitzpatrickJ.J.TauntonR.L.BeneliolJ. Q. (Eds.). Annual Review of Nursing Research. (Vol. 7). New York: Springer.
10.
KritekP.B. (1978). The generation and classification of nursing diagnoses: Toward a theory of nursing. Image. 1033–40.
11.
KritekP.B. (1986). Development of a taxonomic structure for nursing diagnoses: A review and an update. In HurleyM. E. (Ed.). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the sixth conference. (pp. 23–33). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
12.
McManusR.L. (1950, June). Assumption of functions of nursingPaper presented at the Regional Planning for Nursing and Nursing Education Conference, Plymouth, NH.
13.
NewmanM.A. (1982). Theoretical framework for the classification of nursing diagnoses. KimM.J.MoritzD.A. (Eds.). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the third and fourth national conferences, (pp. 225–226). New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
NewmanM.A. (1984). Nursing diagnoses: Looking at the whole. American Journal of Nursing, 841496–1499.
15.
NewmanM. (1987). Nursing's emerging paradigm: The diagnosis of pattern. In McLaneA. M. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses; Proceedings of the seventh conference, (pp. 53–60). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
16.
North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (1986). NANDA Nursing Diagnosis Taxonomy I. St. Louis, MO: Author.
17.
North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (1989). NANDA Nursing Diagnosis Taxonomy I Revised. St. Louis, MO: Author.
18.
North American Nursing Diagnosis Association, & The American Nurses Association. (1989). The proposed ICD-10 version of NANDA's Taxonomy I Revised: Conditions that necessitate nursing care. St. Louis, MO: Author.
19.
WerleyH.H.LangN.M.WestlakeS.K. (1986). Brief summary of the Nursing Minimum Data Set Conference. Nursing Management, 17, 42–45.
20.
WerleyH.H.LangN.M. (1988). The Nursing Minimum Data Set. New York: Springer.
