NANDA's Definition of Nursing Diagnosis: A Plea for Conceptual Clarity

Abstract

A working definition of nursing diagnosis was adopted by the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA) Biennial Business Meeting in March 1990. Because of the working nature of the definition, members and nonmembers of the Association were invited to judge the merits and faults of the definition and to recommend areas needing further debate, analysis, or modification. The purpose of this article is to apply principles and rules of definition to an analysis of the working definition of nursing diagnosis as adopted by the NANDA General Assembly. In presenting this analysis, concerns and questions regarding the conceptual, logical, and grammatical clarity of essential elements (e.g., clinical judgment; individual, family, or community responses; actual or potential health problems; and actual or potential life processes) in the definition are posed; and, where appropriate, suggestions for clarification are offered. Further debate, research, and clinical testing is requested in an attempt to improve NANDA's very important contribution to the development of nursing practice theory.

Keywords

nursing diagnosis concept formation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Nurses' Association . (1980). Nursing. A social policy statement. Kansas city, MO: Author.

Bircher

A.U.

(1986). Nursing diagnosis: Where does the conceptual framework fit. In Hurley

M. E.

(Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the sixth conference (pp. 66–97). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

Black

(1952). Critical thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.

Carnevali

D.L.

(1983). Nursing care planning: Diagnosis and management. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

Carpenito

(in press). Development of the NANDA definition of nursing diagnosis. In Carroll-Johnson

R.M.

(Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the ninth conference. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

Carrieri

V.K.

Lindsey

A.M.

West

CM.

(1986). Pathophysiological phenomena in nursing. Philadelphia: Saunders.

Carroll–Johnson

R.M.

(1990). Reflections on the ninth biennial conference. Nursing Diagnosis, 1, 50.

Cohen

M.R.

Nagel

(1934). An introduction to logic and scientific method. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & Company.

Feinstein

A.R.

(1967). Clinical judgment. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

10.

Fitzmaurice

J.B.

(1987). Nurses' use of cues in the clinical judgment of activity intolerance. In McLane

A. M.

(Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the seventh conference (pp. 315–323). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

11.

Gordon

(1987). Nursing diagnosis, process and application. New York: McGraw–Hill.

12.

Griffith

J.W.

Christensen

P.J.

(1982). Nursing process. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

13.

Hempel

C.G.

(1966). Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.

14.

Kelly

M.A.

(1985). Nursing diagnosis sourcebook. Nor-walk, CI: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

15.

Kritek

P.B.

(1986). Development of a taxonomic structure for nursing diagnoses: A review and an update. In Hurley

M. E.

(Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the sixth national conference (pp. 23–38). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

16.

Lindsey

A.S.

(1990). Identification and labeling of human responses. Journal of Professional Nursing, 6, 143–150.

17.

McLane

A.M.

(1987). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the seventh conference. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

18.

Miers

L.J.

(1987). The concept of nursing diagnosis for theory and practice Unpublished paper, University of Alabama School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

19.

North American Nursing Diagnosis Association . (1986). Bylaws. St. Louis, MO: Author.

20.

North American Nursing Diagnosis Association . (1987). Taxonomy I. St. Louis, MO: Author.

21.

North American Nursing Diagnosis Association . (1989). Taxonomy I revised—-1989 St. Louis, MO:Author.

22.

North American Nursing Diagnosis Association . (1990). Guidelines for submission St. Louis, MO:Author.

23.

Roy

(1984). Framework for classification systems development: Progress and issues. In Kim

M.J.

McFarland

G.K.

McLane

A. M.

(Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the fifth national conference (pp. 26–45). St. Louis, MO:Mosby.

24.

Roy

(1988). An explication of the philosophical assumptions of the Roy adaptation model. Nursing Science Quarterly, I, 26–34.

25.

Searles

H.L.

(1956). Logic and scientific methods. New York: Ronald Press.

26.

Suppes

(1957). Introduction to logic. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand.

27.

Werkmeister

W.H.

(1948). An introduction to critical thinking. Lincoln, NE: Johnsen Publishing.