BellC.R. (1967). Plant Variation and Classification. Belmont, C.A: Wads-worth Publishing Co., Inc.
2.
ColerM.S.JohnsonT.JohnsonB.SnaydJ.WiedligerC.CaplanC.DodgeJ.LeeY.ThayerK. (1989). NANDA Taxonomy I: A preliminary validation/ invalidation study, In Carroll–JohnsonR.M. (Ed.). Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Eight Conference. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
3.
EnglandM. (1989). Nursing Diagnosis: A Conceptual Framework. In FitzpatrickJ.J.WhallAL. (Eds.). Conceptual Models of Nursing. Nor-walk, Conn: Appleton & Lange.
4.
FawcettJ. (1988). Guest Editorial: Conceptual model of nursing, nursing diagnosis and nursing theory development. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 8, 397–399.
5.
FleishmanE.A. (1975). Toward a taxonomy of human performance. American Psychologist, 30, 1127–1149.
6.
FleishmanE.A.QuaintanceM.K. (1984). Taxonomies of Human Performance. Orlando, FL: Harcourt–Brace–Jovanovich.
7.
GebbieK.M.LavinM.A. (1975). Classification of Nursing Diagnosis: Proceedings of the First National Conference, St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
8.
JennyJ. (1989). Classifying nursing diagnoses: A self-care approach. Nursing & Health Care, 10, 83–85.
9.
LevineM.E. (1987). Approaches to the development of a nursing diagnosis taxonomy. In McLaneA. M. (Ed.). Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
10.
MillsW. (1991). Nursing Diagnosis: The Importance of a Definition. Nursing Diagnosis, 2, 3–8.
11.
North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (1989). Taxonomy I–Revised 1989. St. Louis, MO: author.
12.
North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (1990). Taxonomy I–Revised 1990. St. Louis, MO: author.
13.
PorterE.J. (1986). Critical analysis of NANDA nursing diagnosis Taxonomy I. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship.18, 136–139.
14.
RoySr. C. (1982). Theoretical framework for classification of nursing diagnosis. In KimM.J.MoritzD. A. (Eds.). Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Third and Fourth National Conferences. New York: McGraw–Hill.