The clinical presence of impaired physical mobility documented for acute-care patients was studied. The frequency, individual, and group sensitivity levels of the defining characteristics documented as empirical referents for the diagnosis were examined. The frequency of the related factors associated with the diagnosis, patient demographics, length of stay (LOS), discharge destination, and diagnostic-related groups (DRGs) were also examined. Data were obtained from electronic tapes of patient information. Support was found for impaired mobility, as a high-frequency diagnosis, in heterogeneous acute-care patients. No support was found for any major defining characteristics across the heterogeneous sample. A cluster of three defining characteristics: (a) inability to purposefully move within the environment; (b) decreased muscle strength, control, or mass; and (c) imposed restrictions of movement was supported by group sensitivity measures. Major defining characteristics were supported in two DRG subsets. Clusters of defining characteristics varied among four DRGs. The NANDA-preidentified related factors were associated with the diagnosis. Electronic storage and retrieval of computerized nursing data, including the elements of the Nursing Minimum Data Set (NMDS), was an effective, efficient method for data collection and analysis.
BrennenP. F.RomanoC.A. (1987). Computers and nursing diagnoses. Nursing Clinics of North America, 22, 935–941.
2.
CastlesM.R. (1982). Interrater agreement in the use of nursing diagnosis (1978). In KimM.J.MoritzD. A. (Eds.). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the third and fourth national conferences (pp. 153–158). New York: McGraw–Hill.
3.
CianfraniK.L. (1987). The relatedness of cues with diagnostic labels following use of a patient care program. In McLaneA. M. (Ed.). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the seventh conference (p. 344). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
4.
CreasonN.S.PogueN.J.NelsonA.A.HoytC.A. (1985). Validating the nursing diagnosis of impaired physical mobility. Nursing Clinics of North America, 20, 669–683.
5.
DapiceL.A.HanleyM.V.WongJ. (1987). Nursing diagnosis in the hospitalized chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient: A pilot study. In McLaneA. M. (Ed.) Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the seventh conference (pp. 259–265). St Louis, MO: C.V. Mosby.
6.
DelaneyC.W.MehmertP.A. (1991). Utility of the NMDS in validation of computerized nursing diagnoses. In Carroll–JohnsonR. (Ed.). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the ninth conference (pp. 175–179). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
7.
GebbieK.M.LavinM.A. (1975). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the first conference (pp. 81–82). St. Louis, Mosby.
8.
GordonM. (1985). Practice-based data set for a nursing information system. Journal of Medical Systems, 9 (1/2), 43–55.
9.
GordonM.SweeneyM.A. (1979). Methodological problems and issues in identifying and standardizing nursing diagnoses. Advances in Nursing Science2 (1), 1–15.
10.
HalfmannT.M.PiggJ.S. (1984). Nurses' perceptions of rheumatic disease patient problems as evidenced in nursing diagnoses, etiologies, defining characteristics, expected outcomes, and interventions. In KimM.J.McFarlandG. K.McLaneA. M. (Eds.). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the fifth conferences (pp. 216–223). St Louis, MO: Mosby.
11.
HalloranE.J.KileyM.L.NadzamD. (1986). Nursing diagnosis for identification of severity of condition and resource use. In HurleyM. E. (Ed.). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the sixth national conference (pp. 299–310). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
12.
HardyM.A.MaasM.AkinsJ. (1989). The prevalence of nursing diagnoses among elderly and long-term care residents: A descriptive comparison. In Carroll-JohnsonR. (Ed.) Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eighth national conference. (pp 212–221). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
13.
JonesP.E. (1982). The revision of nursing diagnosis terms (1980). In KimM.J.MoritzD.A. (Eds.). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the third and fourth national conferences (pp. 196–203). New York: McGraw–Hill.
14.
KeenanK. (1989). Clinical validation of the etiologies and defining characteristics of nursing diagnosis impaired mobility. In Carroll-JohnsonR.M. (Ed.). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eighth conference (pp. 291–295). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
15.
KelseyJ.L.ThompsonW.D.EvansA.S. (1986). Methods in observational epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
KimM.J.AmorosoR.GulanickM.MoyerK.ParsonsE.ScherbelJ.StaffordM.J.SuhaydaR.YocumC. (1982). Clinical use of nursing diagnosis in cardiovascular nursing. In KimM.J.MoritzD. A. (Eds.). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the third and fourth national conferences (pp. 184–195). New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
KimM.K.MoritzD.A. (1982). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the third and fourth national conferences. New York: McGraw–Hill.
18.
LeslieF.M. (1981). Nursing diagnosis: Use in long-term care. American Journal of Nursing, 81, 1012–1014.
19.
LevinR.F.KrainovitchB.C.BahrenburgE.MitchellC.A. (1989). Diagnostic content validity of nursing diagnoses. IMAGE: Journal of Nursing Scholarship21 (1), 40–44.
20.
MartinK.A.YorkK.A. (1984). Incidence of nursing diagnoses. In KimM.J.McFarlandG.K.McLaneA.M. (Eds.). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the fifth conference (pp. 224–231). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
21.
McKeehanK.M.GordonM. (1982). Utilization of accepted diagnoses. In KimM.J.MoritzD. A. (Eds.). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the third and fourth national conferences (pp. 190–195). New York: McGraw–Hill.
22.
McKeighenR.J.MehmertP.A.DickelC.A. (1991). Bathing/Hygiene self care deficit: Defining characteristics and related factors across age groups and diagnosis related groups in an acute care setting. Nursing Diagnosis, 1, (4), pp. 155–161.
23.
MehmertP.A. (1990). Impaired physical mobility: Validating the nursing diagnosisUnpublished master's thesis, University of Dubuque, Dubuque, IA.
24.
MetzgerK.L.HiltunenE.F. (1987). Diagnostic content validation of ten frequently reported nursing diagnoses. In McLaneA. M. (Ed.) Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the seventh conference (pp. 144–153). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
25.
North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. (1990). Taxonomy I - Revised 1990: With official diagnostic categories. St. Louis, MO: Author.
26.
RantzM.MillerT.JacobsC. (1985). Nursing diagnoses in long-term care. American Journal of Nursing85 (5), 916–926.
27.
RiosH.DelaneyC.W.KruckebergT.ChungY.MehmertP.A. (1991). Validation of defining characteristics of four nursing diagnoses using a computerized data base. Journal of Professional Nursing7 (5), 293–299.
28.
Taylor–LoughronA.E.La O'BrienM.E.ChapelleR.RangelS. (1989) Defining Characteristics of the nursing diagnoses fear and anxiety: A validation study. Applied Nursing Research2, 178–186.
29.
TribottiS.LyonsN.BlackburnS.SteinM.WithersJ. (1988). Nursing diagnoses for the postpartum woman. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 17, 410–416.
30.
WerleyH. H.LangN. M. (1988). Identification of the nursing minimum data set. New York: Springer.
31.
WoodtliA. (1988). Identification of nursing diagnoses and defining characteristics: Two research models. Research in Nursing & Health, 11, 399–406.
32.
ZielstorffR.D.McHughM.L.ClintonJ. (1988). Computer design criteria. Kansas city, MO: American Nurses' Association.
