Nursing Effort and the Exchanging Human Response Pattern

Abstract

This descriptive, comparative study was done to determine the nursing effort required to treat actual and potential nursing diagnoses from the Exchanging Human Response Pattern in two patient care specialties: acute medical–surgical and postpartum. Patterns of diagnosis identification are described for the two groups, and differences in allocation of nursing resources (nursing effort) are examined. The sample included 200 observations (hospital days) for 50 patients: 33 postpartum patients, and 17 medical–surgical patients. Data were collected daily during the study period by nurses who provided direct care to the selected patients using an investigator-developed version of the Nurse–Patient Summary (NPS) nursing information and patient classification tool (Halloran. 1985). Potential nursing diagnoses received most of the nursing effort in the postpartum area (mean effort = 5.28), whereas actual nursing diagnoses in the Exchanging Human Response Pattern received a higher priority in the medical–surgical area (mean effort = 12.03). Statistically significant differences existed between groups in total nursing effort (t = -4.73, p < .0001) and in nursing effort required to treat actual (t = -7.42, p < .0001) and potential diagnoses (t = 3.99, p < .0001) in the Exchanging Human Response Pattern. This study provides unique information about how nurses allocate their lime to patients for the treatment of actual and potential nursing diagnoses, and outlines areas for further development in diagnosis-based patient classification.

Keywords

nursing diagnosis nursing effort patient classification exchanging

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Astbury

(1986). Recording patient dependency: the most suitable time. Nursing Times, 82 (21) 40–1.

Benner

Tanner

(1987). Clinical judgment: how expert nurses use intuition. American Journal of Nursing, 23–31.

Edwardson

S.R.

(1985). Measuring nursing productivity. Nursing Economics, 3 (1) 9–14.

Fitzpatrick

J.J.

(1991). Taxonomy II: Definitions and development. In Carroll–Johnson

R. M.

(Ed.), Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings from the Ninth Conference (pp 23–29). Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.

Halloran

E.J.

(1983). RN Staffing: more care–less cost. Nursing Management 14 (9), 18–22.

Halloran

E.J.

(1985). Nursing workload, medical diagnosis related groups and nursing diagnoses. Research in Nursing and Health, 8 (4) 421–433.

Halloran

E.J.

Kiley

(1984). Case mix management. Nursing Management, 15 (2) 39–41. 44–45.

Halloran

E.J.

Kiley

Nadzum

(1986). Nursing diagnosis for identification of severity of condition and resource use. In Hurley

M. E.

(Ed.), Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings from the Sixth Conference (pp. 299–310). St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Co.

Halloran

E.J.

Nosek

(1986). Interrater reliability on patient assessments using nursing diagnosis, unpublished data.

10.

Halloran

E.J.

Patterson

Kiley

(1987). Case mix: matching patient need with nursing resource. Nursing Management, 18 (3) 27–42.

11.

Halloran

E.J.

Kiley

England

(1988). Nursing diagnoses, DRG's, and length of stay. Applied Nursing Research, 1 (1) 22–27.

12.

Harron

Schaeffer

(1986). DRG's and the intensity of skilled nursing. Geriatric Nursing, 7 (1) 31–33.

13.

Hinshaw

A.S.

(1889). Keynote address: Nursing diagnosis: Forging the link between theory and practice. In Carroll–Johnson

R.M.

(Ed.), Classification of Nursing Diagnosis: Proceedings of the Eighth Conference, (pp. 3–10). Philadelphia: Lippincott.

14.

Kim

M.J.

McFarland

G.K.

McLane

A.M.

(Eds.). (1984). Classification of Nursing Diagnosis: Proceedings of the Fifth Conference, St. Louis, Mo: C.V. Mosby, Co.

15.

NANDA (1990). Taxonomy I revised. St. Louis, MO: Author.

16.

Newman

M.A.

(1987). Nursing's emerging paradigm: the diagnosis of pattern. In McLane

A. M.

(Ed.), Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference (pp. 53–60). St. Louis, Mo: C.V. Mosby, Co.

17.

Nosek

L.J.

(1986). Explanation of hospital stay by nursing diagnoses, medical diagnoses and social position. (Doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University; 1986). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47(1), 2840.

18.

Nosek

L.J.

England

Halloran

E.J.

Kiley

Pinkley

Sipin

Taylor

(1990). Getting to the reliability òf nursing diagnoses (submitted for presentation).

19.

O'Brien

G.J.

(1986). The intuitive method of patient dependency. Nursing Times, 82 (23) 57–61.

20.

Smith

D.W.

Hogan

A.J.

Rohrer

J.E.

(1987). Activities of daily living as quantitative indicators of nursing effort. Medical Care, 25 (2) 120–130.

21.

Sovie

M.D.

Torcenale

M.A.

vanPutte

A.W.

Stunden

A.E.

(1985). Amalgam of nursing acuity, DRG's and cost. Nursing Management, 16 (3) 22–42.

22.

Stevens

Goucher

(1985). Measurement of patient dependency. Nursing Times, 81 (4) 54–55.