The authors describe the development of a research tool for studies on nursing diagnosis by the Computer-Aided Research in Nursing (CARIN) project. The tool, a computerized assessment guide, has reliable and valid items for the identification of patient problem areas. The patient information in the assessment guide, nursing diagnoses identified by the clinical nurse specialist, and a statistical interface are linked in a customized computer program for the CARIN project, providing a system capable of analyzing patient problems from several perspectives. The system provides an accurate assessment and subsequent analysis of patient problems, as well as large data sets. Implications for the future of nursing diagnosis research are discussed.
AlexanderC. (1990). Epidemiologic approaches to validation of nursing diagnosis. Monograph of the Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses. St. Louis, MO: NANDA.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (1984). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3d ed. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
ChangB.GilbertS. (1988). The development of a system for computer aided research in nursing. In GreenesR. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th Annual Symposium of Computer Application in Medical Care (pp. 801–803). Los Angeles: IEEE Computer Society L.A.
4.
ChangB.RothK.GonzalesE.CaswellD.DiStefanoJ. (1989). CANDI: A knowledge based system for nursing diagnosis, Computers in Nursing, 6, 13–21.
5.
ChangB.GonzalesE.CaswellD. (1988). Validity and reliability of a patient assessment guide for identifying nursing diagnoses. Australian Journal of Nursing, 5, (2), 16–20.
6.
ChangB.HirschM.Brazal-VillanuevaE.IversonD. (1990). Self-care deficit with etiologies: Reliability of measurement. Nursing Diagnosis, 1, 31–36.
7.
FolsteinM.FolsteinS.McHughP. (1975). Mini-mental state. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
8.
GordonM. (1987). Manual of nursing diagnosis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
GyldenvandT.TunickD. (1989). Validation of the nursing diagnosis alteration in comfort: Chronic pain. In Carroll-JohnsonR.M. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnosis: Proceedings of the eighth conference (pp. 284–290). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
10.
KatzS.FordA.MoskowitzR.JacksonB.JaffeeM. (1963). Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA, 185, 914–919.
11.
KashmerJ. (1991) Expert nursing diagnoses, the link between nursing care plans and patient classification systems. JONA21 (1), 31–39.
12.
KerrM.HoskinsL.FitzpatrickJ.WarrenJ.AvantK.CarpenitoL.HurleyM.JakobD.LunneyM.MillsW.RottkampB. (1992). Development of definitions for taxonomy II. Nursing Diagnosis, 3, 65–71.
13.
KimM. (1991). Integrated methods for nursing diagnosis research. In Carol-JohnsonR.M. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnosis: Proceedings of the ninth conference (pp. 201–206). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
14.
KimM. (1989). Nursing diagnosis. In FitzpatrickJ.TauntonR., and BenolielJ. (Eds.), Annual Review of Nursing Research, (pp. 117–142). New York: Springer.
15.
KimM.McFarlandG.McLaneA. (1984). Classification of nursing diagnosis: Proceedings of the fifth national conference. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
16.
KorpmanR. (1984). Patient care information systems: Looking to the future. Part IV: The changing role of computers in nursing. Software in Healthcare2 (5), 58.
OremD. (1985). Nursing concepts of practice (3d ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
RadloffL. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.
21.
RothK.DiStefanoJ.ChangB. (1989). CANDI: Development of the automated nursing assessment tool. Computers in Nursing, 7, 222–227.
22.
RoySr. C. (1984). Framework for classification system development: Progress and issues. In KimM.McFarlandG.McLaneA. (Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the fifth national conference. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
23.
RoySr. C.AndrewsH. (1991). The Roy adaptation model: The definitive statement. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
24.
SabaV. (1989). Nursing diagnosis in computerized patient classification systems. In Carroll-JohnsonR.M. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnosis: Proceedings of the eighth conference (pp. 84–88). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
25.
SchroederM. (1990). Tool development: Validity related to nursing diagnosis. Monograph of the Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses. St. Louis, MO: NANDA.
26.
SpielbergerC.GorschR.LusheneR.VaggP.JacobsG. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
WerleyH.DevineE.ZornC. (1989). Nursing minimum data set: An abstraction tool for computerized nursing services data In SabaV.RiederK.PocklintonD. (Eds.), Nursing and computers (pp. 217–225). New York: Springer-Verlag.
29.
WerleyH.DevineE.ZornC. (1990). Nursing minimum data set (NMDS) data collection manual. Milwaukee, WI: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee School of Nursing.
30.
WerleyH.LangH. (Eds.). (1988). Identification of the nursing minimum data set. New York: Springer.
