Diagnostic content validation of nursing diagnoses is a recommended means to confirm the defining characteristics necessary to establish a specific nursing diagnosis. The diagnostic content validity model has been used in numerous studies to develop lists of major and minor defining characteristics recommended by experts as being present in patients with specific diagnoses. The authors provide an overview of the diagnostic content validity model, review the meaning and purposes of content validity, discuss problems with information processing, and suggest revisions to the diagnostic content validity model. Incorporation of these changes may improve the usability of nursing diagnoses in clinical practice, education, and research.
BennerP. (1984). From novice to expert. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
CarminesE.ZellerR. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
FaddenT.FehringR.Kenkel-RossiE. (1987). Clinical validation of the diagnosis anxiety. In McLaneA. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the seventh conference (pp. 113–119). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
4.
FehringR. (1986). Validating diagnostic labels: Standard methodology. In HurleyM. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the sixth conference (pp. 183–190). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
FitzmauriceJ. (1987). Nurses' use of cues in the clinical judgment of activity intolerance. In McLaneA. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the seventh conference (pp. 315–322). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
7.
GordonM.SweeneyM. (1979). Methodological problems and issues in identifying and standardizing nursing diagnoses. Advances in Nursing Science2 (1), 1–15.
8.
GordonM. (1981). Identifying data through the nursing diagnosis approach. In WerleyH.GrierR. (Eds.), Nursing information systems (pp. 32–35). New York: Springer.
9.
JonesJ. (1988). Clinical reasoning in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 13, 185–192.
10.
Lien-GieschenT. (1991). Social isolation related to maturational age. The elderly. Unpublished master's, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
11.
MahoneyK. (1989). A validation study of the nursing diagnosis potential for infection. In Carroll-JohnsonR. M. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eighth conference (pp. 333–340). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
12.
MerluzziT.RudyR.GlassC. (1981). The information processing paradigm: Implications for clinical science. In MerluzziT.GlassC.GenestM. (Eds.), Cognitive assessment (pp. 77–120). New York: Guilford Press.
13.
MetzgerK.HiltunenE. (1987). Diagnostic content validation of ten frequently reported nursing diagnoses. In McLaneA. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the seventh conference (pp. 113–119). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
14.
NewellA.SimonH. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
RoyC. (1988). Human information processing. In FitzpatrickJ.TauntonR.BenolielJ. (Eds.), Annual review of nursing research, Vol. 6 (pp. 237–262). New York: Springer.
17.
SchroederM. (1989). Tool development: Validity - related to nursing diagnosis. Monograph of the Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses. St. Louis, MO: NANDA.
18.
SchroederM. (1991). Quantitative methods for nursing diagnosis research In Carroll-JohnsonR.M. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the ninth conference (pp. 192–200). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
19.
SimonH. (1979). Models of thought. New Haven: Yale University Press.
20.
SparksS. (1990). Nurse validation of pressure ulcer risk factors (Doctoral dissertation, The Catholic University of America, University Microfilms No. 9027961).
21.
TannerC. (1987). Theoretical perspectives for research on clinical judgment. In HannahK.ReimerM.MillsW.LetourneauS. (Eds.), Clinical judgment and decision making, (pp. 21–28). New York: Wiley.
22.
WestfallU.TannerC.PutzierD.PadrickC. (1986). Activating clinical inferences: A component of diagnostic reasoning in nursing. Research in Nursing & Health, 9, 269–277.
