Ongoing evaluation of the use of nursing diagnoses at the clinical level is critical to the facilitation of further development and refinement of the language of nursing. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify the status of utilization of nursing diagnosis in Illinois. A survey instrument was mailed to 239 Illinois hospitals 139 (58%) responded. Results included: 78% of the responding hospitals had implemented nursing diagnosis, with almost all (95%) utilizing NANDA terminology. Components of continuing education efforts related to nursing diagnosis were identified by 75% of the hospitals. Ongoing monitoring of quality improvement methods was reported by 45% of the respondents. The barriers to implementation cited most frequently included: limited ongoing education, lack of motivation to learn, or nurses’ difficulties in adjusting to its use.
BaldwinK.LueckenotteA. (1986). Use of nursing diagnosis in community health agencies using the PORS. In HurleyM. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Procredings of the sixth conference (pp. 330–337). St. Louis: Mosby.
2.
BaldwinK. (1991). Independent nursing diagnosis in emergency nursing. In Carroll-JohnsonR. M. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the ninth conference (pp. 266–267). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
3.
BruG. (1989). Using and documenting nursing diagnosis in an ambulatory setting. Journal of the Association of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 6, 7–10.
4.
BugleL.FrischN.WoodsT. (1990). The use of nursing diagnosis in a nurse-managed college health service. Journal of American college Health, 38, 191–192.
5.
BulechekG.KrauseV.WakefieldB.KowalskiD. (1990). An evaluation guide to assist with implementation of nursing diagnosis. Nursing Diagnosis, 1, 18–23.
6.
Carroll-JohnsonR. M. (Ed.). (1991). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the ninth conference. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
7.
CzuryloK.SuhaydaR. (1986). Implementation of nursing diagnosis: The role of the clinical nurse specialist. In HurleyM. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the sixth conference (pp. 276–281). St. Louis: Mosby.
8.
DavenportN.McCombM. (1984). Implementation of a nursing diagnosis to increase autonomy and accountability. In KimM. J.McFarlandG.McLaneA. (Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the fifth national conference (pp. 463–467). St. Louis: Mosby.
GebbieC. (1994, March). The politics of nursing diagnosis. Paper presented at the 11th Biennial conference of the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association, Nashville, TN.
11.
GreenleeK. (1991). The effects of implementation of an operational definition and guidelines for the formulation of nursing diagnoses in a critical care setting. In Carroll-JohnsonR. M. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the ninth conference (pp. 260–261). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
12.
KimM. J.AmorosoR.GulanickM.MoyerK.ParsonsE.ScherubelJ.StaffordM.SuhaydaR.YocumC. (1982). Clinical use of nursing diagnosis in cardiovascular nursing. In KimM. J.McFarlandG.McLaneA. (Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the third and fourth national conferences (pp. 184–190). St. Louis: McGraw-Hill.
13.
LancourJ. (1986). Implementation of nursing diagnosis Acute and long-term care settings. In HurleyM. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the sixth conference (pp. 143–150). St. Louis: Mosby.
14.
LangN. (1994, March). International classification for nursing practice. Paper presented at the 11th Biennial Conference of the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association, Nashville, TN.
15.
LarsonJ.SoholtD.FriestadC.AbrahamM.ClemensD.JudgeM.GasparP.RitterD. (1991). Utilization of nursing diagnosis in South Dakota. In Carroll-JohnsonR. M. (Ed.), Classifications of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the ninth conference (pp. 262–263). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
16.
LutjensL. (1993). The nature and use of nursing diagnosis in hospitals. Nursing Diagnosis, 4, 107–113.
17.
MacAvoyS. (1989). Statewide utilization strategies. In Carroll-JohnsonR. M. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eighth conference (pp. 18–19). St. Louis: Lippincott.
18.
MartinP.DuganJ.FreundlM.LarsenB.LipsR.MillerS.SharrittsL.YorkK.BurleyJ.DelaneyL.RehmanM.ThorpeT. (1989). In Carroll-JohnsonR. M. (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eighth conference (pp. 178–184). St. Louis: Lippincott.
19.
MartinK.ScheetN. (1992). The Omaha system: Applications to community health nursing. Philadelphia: Saunders.
MiaskowskiC.SpangenbergS.GarofallouG. (1984). An evaluation study of the implementation of nursing diagnosis. In KimM. J.McFarlandG.McLaneA. (Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the fifth national conference (pp. 232–240). St. Louis: Mosby.
22.
MundingerM.JauronG. (1975). Developing a nursing diagnosis. Nursing Outlook, 23, 94–98.
23.
National Center for Nursing Research (1993). Nursing informatics: Enhancing patient care (pp. 16–17). Bethesda, MD: US. Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health.
24.
NeufeldA.HarrisonM. (1994). Use of nursing diagnosis with population groups. Nursing Diagnosis, 5, 165–171.
25.
Novotny-DinsdaleV. (1985). Implementation of nursing diagnosis in the emergency department. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 11, 140–144.
26.
OttoS.LaRoccaJ. (1988). Nursing diagnosis: Challenge for intravenous nursing practice. Journal of Intravenous Nursing, 11, 245–248.
27.
RantzM.Vinz-MillerT.MatsonS. (1995). Nursing diagnoses in long-term care: A longitudinal perspective for strategic planning. Nursing Diagnosis, 6, 57–63.
28.
SabaV. (1992). Diagnosis and interventions. Caring, 11, 50–57.
29.
TothL.CostD.KeyesB.DeliS.BerkowichB. (1984). Implementation of nursing diagnosis in trauma setting. In KimM. J.McFarlandG.McLaneA. (Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the fifth national conference (pp. 291–299). St. Louis: Mosby.
30.
ZinkM. (1991). Home care nurses' perception of standardized nursing diagnosis. Home Healthcare Nurse, 9, 27–32.
