We are reprinting selected papers occasionally to share with readers the history of the research work and the methodologies involved. This article is reprinted from Monographs of the Invitational Conference on Research Methods for Validating Nursing Diagnoses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaerC.A.DeloreyM.FitzmauriceJ.B. (1984). A study to evaluate the validity of the rating system for self-care deficit. InKimM.J.McFarlandG.K.McLaneA.M., (Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the fifth national conference (pp.185–191). St. Louis: Mosby.
2.
BalistrieriT.M.JirickaM.K. (1984). Validation of a nursing diagnosis role disturbance. InKimM.J.McFarlandG.K.McLaneA.M., (Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnoses (pp.180–184). St. Louis: Mosby.
3.
CampbellD.T.FiskeD.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.
4.
CampbellD.T.StanleyJ.C. (1963). Experimental and quasiexperimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
5.
CreasonN.S.PogueN.J.NelsonA.A.HoytC.A. (1985). Validating the nursing diagnosis of impaired physical mobility. Nursing Clinics of North America, 20, 669–683.
6.
DaltonJ. (1985). A descriptive study: Defining characteristics of nursing diagnosis cardiac output, alternations in: decreased. Image, 17, 113–117.
7.
DenzinN.K. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. ( Chicago: Aldine).
8.
DenzinN.K. (1978). The research act (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
DuffeyM.E. (1987). Methodological triangulation: A vehicle for merging quantitative and qualitative research methods. Image, 19, 130–133.
10.
FaddenT.FehringR.J.Kenkel-RossiE. (1987). Clinical validation of the diagnosis anxiety. InMcLaneA.M., (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnosis: Proceedings of the seventh conference (pp.113–120), St. Louis: Mosby.
11.
FehringR.J. (1986). Validating diagnostic labels: Standardized methodology. InHurleyM.E., (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the sixth conference (pp.183–190). St. Louis: Mosby.
GordonM. (1986). Structure of diagnositic categories. InHurleyM.E. (Ed.). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the sixth conference (pp.39–49). St. Louis: Mosby.
14.
GordonM.SweeneyM.A. (1979). Methodological problems and issues in identifying and standardizing nursing diagnoses. Advances in Nursing Science, 2, 1–15.
15.
GuzettaC.E.ForsythG.L. (1979). Nursing diagnostic pilot study: Psycho-physiologic stress. Advances in Nursing Science, 2, 27–44.
16.
HoskinsL. (1988). Clinical validation methodologies for nursing diagnosis. InCarroll-JohnsonR.M., (Ed.) Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the eighth national conference (pp.126–131). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
17.
HoskinsL.M.McFarlaneE.A.RubenfeldM.G.WalshM.B.ScheierA.M. (1986). Nursing diagnosis in the chronically ill: Methodology for clinical validation. Advances in Nursing Science, 8, 80–89.
18.
HurleyM.E. (1986). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the sixth conference (pp.197–206). St. Louis: Mosby.
19.
JicksT.D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602–611.
20.
KirkL.W. (1986). The design for relevance, revisited: an elaboration of the conceptual framework for nursing diagnosis. InHurleyM.E., (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the sixth conference (pp.50–65). St. Louis: Mosby.
21.
KimM.J. (1986). Nursing diagnosis: A Janus view. InHurleyM.E., (Ed.) Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the sixth conference (pp.1–14). St. Louis: Mosby.
22.
KimM.J.Amoroso-SeritelloR.GulanickM.MayerK.ParsonsE.ScherbelJ. (1984). Clinical validation of cardiovascular nursing diagnoses. InKimM.J.McFarlandG.K.McLaneA.M. (Eds.). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the fifth national conference (pp.128–138). St. Louis: Mosby.
23.
KritekP.B. (1986). Development of a taxonomic structure for nursing diagnosis: A review and an update. InHurleyM.E., (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the sixth conference. St. Louis: Mosby.
24.
LoC.H.KimM.J. (1986). Construct validity of sleep pattern disturbance: A methodological approach. InHurleyM.E., (Ed.), Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the sixth conference (pp.197–206). St. Louis: Mosby.
25.
McLaneA.M., (Ed.) (1987). Classification of nursing diagnosis: Proceedings of the seventh conference. ( St. Louis: Mosby).
26.
MitchellE.S. (1986). Multiple triangulation: A methodology for nursing science. Advances in Nursing Science, 8, 18–26.
27.
SohierR. (1988). Multiple triangulation and contemporary nursing research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 10, 732–742.
28.
TannerC.A.HughesA.M. (1984). Nursing diagnosis: Issues in clinical practice research. Topics in Clinical Nursing, 5, 30–38.
29.
WeatherallJ.CreasonN.S. (1987). Validation of the nursing diagnosis, spiritual distress. InMcLaneA.M. (Ed.). Classification of nursing diagnosis: Proceedings of the seventh conference (pp.182–185). St. Louis: Mosby.
30.
WebbE.J.CampbellD.T.SchwartzR.D.SechristL. (1966). Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in social sciences. ( Chicago: Rand McNally).
31.
WerleyH.LangeN. (Eds.). (1988). Identification of the nursing minimum data set. ( New York: Springer).
32.
YorkK.A.MartinP.A. (1986). Clinical validation of respiratory nursing diagnosis: A model. InHurleyM.E. (Ed.). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the sixth conference (pp.497–509). St. Louis: Mosby.
