PURPOSE. Nursing terminology with implications for the rapid response system (RRS) is introduced and proposed: critical incident nursing diagnosis (CIND), defined as the recognition of an acute life-threatening event that occurs as a result of disease, surgery, treatment, or medication; critical incident nursing intervention, defined as any indirect or direct care registered nurse-initiated treatment, based upon clinical judgment and knowledge that a registered nurse performs in response to a CIND; and critical incident control, defined as a response that attempts to reverse a life-threatening condition.
DATA SOURCES. The current literature, research studies, meta-analyses from a variety of disciplines, and personal clinical experience serve as the data sources for this article.
DATA SYNTHESIS. The current nursing diagnoses, nursing interventions, and nursing outcomes listed in the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International Classification, Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC), and Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC), respectively, are inaccurate or inadequate for describing nursing care during life-threatening situations. The lack of such standardized nursing terminology creates a barrier that may impede critical communication and patient care during life-threatening situations when activating the RRS.
CONCLUSIONS. The North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International Classification, NIC, and NOC are urged to refine their classifications and include CIND, critical incident nursing intervention, and critical incident control. The RRS should incorporate standardized nursing terminology to describe patient care during life-threatening situations.
IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE. Refining the diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes classifications will permit nursing researchers, among others, to conduct studies on the efficacy of the proposed novel nursing terminology when providing care to patients during life-threatening situations. In addition, including the proposed novel nursing terminology in the RRS offers a means of improving care in such situations.
BottiM.WilliamsonB.SteenK. (2001). Coronary angiography observations: Evidence based or ritualistic practice?Heart Lung, 30, 138–145.
2.
BuistM. D.JarmolowskiE.BurtonP. R.BernardS. A.WaxmanB. P.AndersonJ. (1999). Recognising clinical instability in hospital patients before cardiac arrest or unplanned admission to intensive care. A pilot study in a tertiary-care hospital. Medical Journal of Australia, 171, 22–25.
3.
ClarkeS. P.AikenL. H. (2003). Failure to rescue. American Journal of Nursing, 103, 42–47.
4.
CretikosM.ChenJ.HillmanK.BellomoR.FinferS.FlabourisA. (2007). The objective medical emergency team activation criteria: A case-control study. Resuscitation, 73, 62–72.
5.
DalyF. F.SidneyK. L.FatovichD. M. (1998). The Medical Emergency Team (MET): A model for the district general hospital. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 28, 795–798.
6.
DeVitaM. A.BellomoR.HillmanK.KellumJ.RotondiA.TeresD., et al. (2006). Findings of the First Consensus Conference on Medical Emergency Teams. Critical Care Medicine, 34, 2463–2478.
7.
EvansD.HodgkinsonB.BerryJ. (2001). Vital signs in hospital patients: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 38, 643–650.
8.
FranklinC.MathewJ. (1994). Developing strategies to prevent inhospital cardiac arrest: Analyzing responses of physicians and nurses in the hours before the event. Critical Care Medicine, 22, 244–247.
9.
GalhotraS.ScholleC. C.DewM. A.MininniN. C.ClermontG.DeVitaM. A. (2006). Medical emergency teams: A strategy for improving patient care and nursing work environments. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55, 180–187.
10.
HillmanK. M.BristowP. J.CheyT.DaffurnK.JacquesT.NormanS. L.et al. (2002). Duration of life-threatening antecedents prior to intensive care admission. Intensive Care Medicine, 28, 1629–1634.
11.
KouwenhovenW. B.JudeJ. R.KnickerbockerG. G. (1960). Closed-chest cardiac massage. Journal of the American Medical Association, 173, 1064–1067.
12.
LeeA.BishopG.HillmanK. M.DaffurnK. (1995). The medical emergency team. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 23, 183–186.
13.
McCloskeyJ. C.BulechekG. M. (Eds.). (2000). Nursing interventions classification (4th ed.). New York: Mosby; p.122.
14.
MoorheadS.JohnsonM.MaasM. (Eds.). (2004). Nursing outcomes classification (3rd ed.) (p. xix). St. Louis, MO: Mosby, Inc.
15.
NealM. C. (Ed.). (2007). Nursing diagnosis: Definitions and classification 2007–2008 (p.279). Philadelphia: NANDA International.
16.
RepaskyT. M.PfeilC. (2005). Experienced critical care nurse-led rapid response teams rescue patients on in-patient units. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 31, 376–379.
17.
SafarP. (1974). Critical care medicine—Quo vadis?Critical Care Medicine, 2, 1–5.
18.
SafarP. (1996). On the history of modern resuscitation. Critical Care Medicine, 24, S3–S11.
19.
SafarP.EscarragaL. A.ElamJ. O. (1958). A comparison of the mouth-to-mouth and mouth-to-airway methods of artificial respiration with the chest-pressure arm-lift methods. New England Journal of Medicine, 258, 671–677.
20.
ScheinR. M.HazdayN.PenaM.RubenB. H.SprungC. L. (1990). Clinical antecedents to in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Chest, 98, 1388–1392.
21.
WongE. (2008a). Coining and defining a novel nursing terminology: Part 1: Critical incident nursing diagnosis. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, 19(3), 89–94.
22.
WongE. (2008b). Coining and defining a novel nursing terminology: Part 2: Critical incident nursing intervention. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, 19(4), 132–139.
23.
WongE. (2009). Coining and defining a novel nursing terminology: Part 3: Critical incident control. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, 20(1), 2–8.
24.
ZeitzK.McCutcheonH. (2002). Policies that drive the nursing practice of postoperative observations. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 39, 831–839.
