Contamination: Concept Analysis and Nursing Implications

Abstract

PURPOSE. To analyze the concept of contamination and discuss the implications for nursing practice, research, and education.

DATA SOURCES. Published research articles, official governmental publications, policy reports, and textbooks.

DATA SYNTHESIS. Various attributes of contamination are described using the Walker and Avant method of concept analysis and include: (a) exposure to a contaminant, and (b) contaminant exists in a dose sufficient to cause adverse health effects. The major antecedents of contamination include the presence of a contaminant, dose, duration of exposure, route of exposure, and individual human differences. Major consequences of contamination include organ and systemic responses, and psychological, social, and economic effects.

CONCLUSIONS. Contamination is an important concept and is essential to the discipline of nursing. The concept of contamination is separate from exposure. Precision in the use of diagnostic language describing contamination incidents will lead to greater accuracy in outcomes and interventions for individuals and groups experiencing overt or covert contamination resulting from accidental or intentional acts. Broad agreement on the definition, antecedents, and consequences of contamination will improve the likelihood of successful management of contamination events.

IMPLICATIONS. The nursing profession makes an important contribution to the improvement of individual, community, and societal environmental health. Clarifying the concept of contamination is an important first step in building the nursing science that will lead to identifying sound nursing interventions.

Keywords

Concept analysis contamination disaster standardized nursing language

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) . (2007). Glossary of terms. Agency for Toxic Substances, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved December 11, 2007, from http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/glossary.html

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) . (1999). Environmental health and nursing—Mississippi delta project. Atlanta, GA: Author.

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) . (1993). Public health assessment guidance manual. Boca Raton, FL: Louis Publishers.

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) . (1990). Case studies in environmental medicine: Dioxin toxicity. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.

All Metals and Forge LLC . (2007). SteeLog: A metallurgical dictionary. Retrieved December 11, 2007, from http://www.steelforge.com/steellogs.htm?letter=C

American Nurses Association (ANA) . (2007). ANA's principles of environmental health for nursing practice with implementation strategies. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Babbie

(1998). The practice of social research (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Berkowitz

Horton

D. K.

Kaye

W. E.

(2004). Hazardous substances releases causing fatalities and/or people transported to hospitals: Rural/agricultural vs. other areas. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 19(3), 213–20.

Biology-Online . Dictionary index. (2005). Retrieved September 15, 2009, from http://biology-online.org/dictionary/Contamination

10.

Blain

P. G.

(2004). Absorption of chemicals and mechanisms of detoxification. In Baxter

P. J.

Adams

P. H.

Cockcroft A

Harrington

J. M.

(Eds.), Hunter's diseases of occupations, (9th ed., pp. 59–74). London: Oxford University Press.

11.

Bronte

(1997). Tenant of Wildfell Hall. Retrieved January 24, 2008, from http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/969

12.

Center for Health Policy Columbia University School of Nursing . (2007). Adapting standards of care under altered conditions. Retrieved December 11, 2007, from http://www.nursingworld.org/HomepageCategory/Announcements/PublicCommentsAdaptingStandardsofCareunderAlteredConditions.aspx

13.

Chalupka

S. M.

(2001). Essentials of environmental health. Enhancing your occupational health nursing practice (Part II). American Association of Occupational Health Nurses Journal, 49(4), 194–213.

14.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) . (2007). Terms of environment: Glossary, abbreviations and acronyms. Retrieved December 11, 2007, from http://www.epa.gov/OCEPAterms

15.

Fawcett

(2005). Contemporary nursing knowledge. Analysis and evaluation of nursing models and theories (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.

16.

Fitchen

J. M.

(1989). When toxic chemicals pollute residential environments: The cultural meanings of home and homeownership. Human Organization, 48(4), 313–324.

17.

Franks

W. J.

(2002). Groundwater contamination. In Gale Group (Eds.), Encyclopedia of public health. New York: Macmillan Reference USA.

18.

Gebbie

K. M.

Qureshi

(2002). Emergency and disaster preparedness: Core competencies for nurses. American Journal of Nursing, 102, 46–51.

19.

Henry

T. K.

(1997). Pesticide exposure seen in primary care. Nurse Practitioner Forum, 8(2), 50–58.

20.

International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry . (2007). Glossary of terms used in toxicology. Retrieved September 15, 2009, from http://www.iupac.org/publications/pac/2007/pdf/7907x1153.pdf

21.

Jennings-Sanders

(2004). Teaching disaster nursing by utilizing the Jennings disaster nursing management model. Nursing Education in Practice, 4(1), 69–76.

22.

Lusk

S. L.

(1996). Monitoring for pesticides exposure. American Association of Occupational Health Nurses Journal, 44(12), 599–603.

23.

Maugham

W. S.

(1997). Of human bondage. Retrieved January 24, 2008, from http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/351

24.

McCauley

L. A.

Michaels

Rothlein

Muniz

Lasarev

Ebbert

(2003). Pesticide exposure and self reported home hygiene: Practices in agricultural families. American Association of Occupational Health Nurses Journal, 51(3), 113–119.

25.

Meeker

B. J.

Carruth

Holland

C. B.

(2002). Health hazards and preventive measures of farm women. American Association of Occupational Health Nurses Journal, 50(7), 307–314.

26.

Merriam–Webster's collegiate dictionary (11th ed.). (2005). Springfield, MA: Merriam–Webster.

27.

NANDA-International . (2007). Nursing diagnoses: Definitions and classifications 2007–2008. Philadelphia, PA: Author.

28.

Neufer

(1994). The role of the community health nurse in environmental health. Public Health Nursing, 11(3), 155–162.

29.

Nursing Emergency Preparedness Education Coalition . (2003). Educational competencies for registered nurses responding to mass casualty incidents. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from http://www.nursing.vanderbilt.edu/incmce/competencies.html

30.

Picou

(1999). Theoretical trends in environmental sociology: Implications for resource management in the modern world. Retrieved January 24, 2008, from http://www.mms.gov/eppd/socecon/files/picou.pdf

31.

Roget's new millennium thesaurus (1st ed.). (2008). Retrieved January 24, 2008, from http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/contamination

32.

Smith

(2006). Sociologists shed light on the environment. Vanguard: Research at Oklahoma State University. Retrieved December 11, 2007, from http://www.vpr.okstate.edu/publications/Vanguard%202006.pdf

33.

Veenema

T. G.

(2006). Expanding educational opportunities in disaster response and emergency preparedness for nurses. Nursing Education Perspectives, 27(2), 93–99.

34.

Veenema

T. G.

(2002). Chemical and biological terrorism. Current updates for nurse educators. Nursing Education Perspectives, 23(2), 62–71.

35.

Walker

L. O.

Avant

K. C.

(2005). Strategies for theory construction in nursing (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.

36.

Wilson

(1963). Thinking with concepts. New York: Cambridge University Press.

37.

Winstead

C. B.

(1993). How pesticides are handled in a rural North Carolina County: A survey of farmers. American Association of Occupational Health Nurses Journal, 41(1), 24–32.

38.

Wisner

Blaikie

Cannon

Davis

(2003). At risk: Natural hazards, people's vulnerability, and disasters (2nd ed.). Retrieved January 24, 2008, from http://www.unisdr.org/eng/library/Literature/7235.pdf

39.

World Health Organization. (WHO) (2004). Review and approval of proposed amendments to the international health regulations. Retrieved September 15, 2009, from http://apps.who.int/gb/ghs/pdf/IHR_IGWG2_ID2-en.pdf